Skip to main content

A model of collaboration network formation with heterogeneous skills


Collaboration networks provide a method for examining the highly heterogeneous structure of collaborative communities. However, we still have limited theoretical understanding of how individual heterogeneity relates to network heterogeneity. The model presented here provides a framework linking an individual's skill set to her position in the collaboration network, and the distribution of skills in the population to the structure of the collaboration network as a whole. This model suggests that there is a non-trivial relationship between skills and network position: individuals with a useful combination of skills will have a disproportionate number of links in the network. Indeed, in some cases, an individual's degree is non-monotonic in the number of skills she has—an individual with very few skills may outperform an individual with many. Special cases of the model suggest that the degree distribution of the network will be skewed, even when the distribution of skills is uniform in the population. The degree distribution becomes more skewed as problems become more difficult, leading to a community dominated by a few high-degree superstars. This has striking implications for labor market outcomes in industries where production is largely the result of collaborative effort.

Hide All
Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (5), 957983.
Astebro, T., & Thompson, P. (2011). Entrepreneurs, Jacks of all trades or Hobos? Research Policy, 40 (5), 637649.
Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A. G., Duflo, E., & Jackson, M. O. (2013). The diffusion of microfinance. Science, 341, 1236498.
Barabasi, A.-L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311 (3–4), 590614.
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286 (5439), 509512.
Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1), 339376.
Calvó-Armengol, A. (2004). Job contact networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 115 (1), 191206.
Calvó-Armengol, A., & Jackson, M. O. (2004). The effects of social networks on employment and inequality. American Economic Review, 94 (3), 426454.
Carayol, N., & Roux, P. (2009). Knowledge flows and the geography of networks: A strategic model of small world formation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 71 (2), 414427.
DeMarzo, P. M., Vayanos, D., & Zwiebel, J. (2003). Persuasion bias, social influence, and uni-dimensional opinions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (3), 909968.
Galeotti, A., Goyal, S., & Kamphorst, J. (2006). Network formation with heterogeneous players. Games and Economic Behavior, 54 (2), 353372.
Gautier, P. A. (2002). Unemployment and search externalities in a model with heterogeneous jobs and workers. Economica, 69 (273), 2140.
Gleiser, P., & Danon, L. (2003). Community Structure in Jazz. Advances in Complex Systems, 6 (4), 565573.
Golub, B., & Jackson, M. O. (2010). Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds. American Economic Journal Microeconomics, 2 (1), 112149.
Goyal, S., & Moraga-González, J. L. (2001). R&D networks. The Rand Journal of Economics, 32 (4), 686707.
Goyal, S., Van Der Leij, M. J., & Moraga-Gonzalez, J. L. (2006). Economics: An emerging small world. Journal of Political Economy, 114 (2), 403412.
Grossman, J. W., & Ion, P. D. F. (1995). On a portion of the well-known collaboration graph. Congressus Numerantium, 108, 129131.
Guimerà, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308 (5722), 697702.
Hamilton, J., Thisse, J.-F., & Zenou, Y. (2000). Wage competition with heterogeneous workers and firms. Journal of Labor Economics, 18 (3), 453472.
Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2001). Problem solving by heterogeneous agents. Journal of Economic Theory, 97 (1), 123163.
Iyer, B., Lee, C.-H., & Venkatraman, N. (2006). Managing in a small world ecosystem: Some lessons from the software sector. California Management Review, 48 (3), 2847.
Jackson, M. O. (2008). Social and economic networks. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Jackson, M. O., & Rogers, B. W. (2005). The economics of small worlds. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3 (2–3), 617627.
Jackson, M. O., & Rogers, B. W. (2007). Relating network structure to diffusion properties through stochastic dominance. The be Journal of Theoretical Economics, 7 (1), 113.
Jackson, M. O., & Wolinsky, A. (1996). A strategic model of social and economic networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 71 (1), 4474.
Jackson, M. O., & Yariv, L. (2007). Diffusion of behavior and equilibrium properties in network games. American Economic Review, 97 (2), 9298.
Jovanovic, B. (1994). Firm formation with heterogeneous management and labor skills. Small Business Economics, 6 (3), 185191.
Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, 108 (3), 632662.
Lazear, E. P. (2004). Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 94 (2), 208211.
Lazear, E. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23 (4), 649680.
Menzel, H., & Katz, E. (1955). Social relations and innovation in the medical profession: The epidemiology of a new drug. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 19 (4), 337352.
Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69 (2), 213238.
Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64 (1), 18.
Newman, M. E. J. (2006). No Title. Physical Review E, 74, 036104.
Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Phillips, K. W., Mannix, E. A., Neale, M. A., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (4), 497510.
Polzer, J. T., Milton, L. P., & Swann, W. B. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (2), 296324.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (1), 116.
Rajan, R. G., & Wulf, J. (2006). The flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (4), 759773.
Ramasco, J. J., Dorogovtsev, S. N., & Pastor-Satorras, R. (2007). Self-organization of collaboration networks. Physical Review E, 70 (3), 10.
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 91115.
Rosen, S. (1981). The economics of superstars. American Economic Review, 71 (5), 845858.
Rosen, S. (1982). Authority, control, and the distribution of earnings. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13 (2), 311323.
Roy, A. D. (1951). Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxford Economic Papers, 3 (2), 135146.
Shi, S. (2002). A directed search model of inequality with heterogeneous skills and skill-biased technology. The Review of Economic Studies, 69 (2), 467491.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87 (3), 355374.
Thomas-Hunt, M. C., Ogden, T. Y., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Who's really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Science, 49 (4), 464477.
Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111 (2), 447504.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Network Science
  • ISSN: 2050-1242
  • EISSN: 2050-1250
  • URL: /core/journals/network-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Anderson supplementary material
Anderson supplementary material

 PDF (253 KB)
253 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed