This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
C. Alexander , M. Piazza , D. Mekos , & T. Valente (2001). Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29 (1), 22–30.
P. M. Blau , & J. E. Schwartz (1984). Crosscutting social circles : testing a macrostructural theory of intergroup relations. Orlando: Academic Press.
W. J. Burk , C. E. G. Steglich , & T. A. B. Snijders (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31 (4), 397–404.
M. Checkley , & C. Steglich (2007). Partners in power: job mobility and dynamic deal-making. European Management Review, 4 (3), 161–171.
J. M. Cohen (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50 (4), 227–241.
J. A. Davis (1970). Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: Testing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices. American Sociological Review, 35 (5), 843–851.
W. De Nooy (2002). The dynamics of artistic prestige. Poetics, 30 (3), 147–167.
S. L. Feld (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86 (5), 1015–1035.
S. L. Feld (1982). Social structural determinants of similarity among associates. American Sociological Review, 47 (6), 797–801.
D. Felmlee , S. Sprecher , & E. Bassin (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships - a hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53 (1), 13–30.
L. Festinger , & H. A. Hutte (1954). An experimental investigation of the effect of unstable interpersonal relations in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49 (4), 513–522.
S. M. Goodreau , J. A. Kitts , & M. Morris (2009). Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography, 46 (1), 103–125.
M. Granovetter (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–1380.
T. Grund , & J. Densley (2012). Ethnic heterogeneity in the activity and structure of a black street gang. European Journal of Criminology, 9 (4), 388–406.
J. V. Hamm (2000). Do birds of a feather flock together? The variable bases for African American, Asian American, and European American adolescents' selection of similar friends. Developmental Psychology, 36 (2), 209–219.
M. A. Hogg (2006). Social identity theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 111–136). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
T. L. Huston , & G. Levinger (1978). Interpersonal attraction and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 115–156.
H. Ibarra (1992). Homophily and differential returns - sex-differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (3), 422–447.
M. Kalmijn (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–421.
D. B. Kandel (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84 (2), 427–436.
A. Knecht , T. A. B. Snijders , C. Baerveldt , C. E. G. Steglich , & W. Raub (2010). Friendship and Delinquency: Selection and Influence Processes in Early Adolescence. Social Development, 19 (3), 494–514.
E. O. Laumann (1973). Bonds of pluralism : the form and substance of urban social networks. New York, London: John Wiley and Sons.
P. F. Lazarsfeld & R. K. Merton (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. H. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). New York: Van Nostrand.
R. Leenders (1996). Evolution of friendship and best friendship choices. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21 (1–2), 133–148.
K. Lewis , M. Gonzalez , & J. Kaufman (2012). Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (1), 68–72.
S. Lindenberg (2009). Why framing should be all about the impact of goals on cognitions and evaluations. In P. Hill, F. Kalter, C. Kroneberg, & R. Schnell (Eds.), Hartmut Essers Erklärende Soziologie (pp. 53–79). Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
H. Louch (2000). Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations. Social Networks, 22 (1), 45–64.
P. V. Marsden (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52 (1), 122–131.
J. M. McPherson , & L. Smithlovin (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations - status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 52 (3), 370–379.
M. McPherson , L. Smith-Lovin , & J. M. Cook (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
M. Pearson , & L. Michell (2000). Smoke rings: social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking. Drugs-Education Prevention and Policy, 7 (1), 21–37.
L. Quillian , & M. E. Campbell (2003). Beyond black and white: The present and future of multiracial friendship segregation. American Sociological Review, 68 (4), 540–566.
R. M. Ripley , T. A. B. Snijders , Z. Boda , A. Vörös and P. Preciado (2014). Manual for RSiena. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nuffield College.
D. R. Schaefer , O. Kornienko , & A. M. Fox (2011). Misery does not love company. American Sociological Review, 76 (5), 764–785.
W. Shrum , N. H. Cheek , & S. M. Hunter (1988). Friendship in school - gender and racial homophily. Sociology of Education, 61 (4), 227–239.
L. Smith-Lovin , & J. M. McPherson (1993). You are who you know: a network perspective on gender. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on gender/Feminism on theory (pp. 223–51). New York: Aldine.
T. A. B. Snijders (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology 2001, 31, 361–395.
T. A. B. Snijders (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (Ch. 11). New York: Cambridge University Press.
, , & (). , , –.T. A. B. Snijders G. G. van de Bunt C. E. G. Steglich 2010 Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks 32 (1) 4460
C. Steglich , P. Sinclair , J. Holliday , & L. Moore (2012). Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial (ASSIST). Social Networks, 34 (3), 359–369.
C. Steglich , T. A. B. Snijders , & M. Pearson (2010). Dynamic networks and behaviour: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329–393.
C. Steglich , T. A. B. Snijders , & B. West (2006). Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the co-evolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology, 2 (1), 48–56.
L. Steinberg , & A. S. Morris (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.
H. Tajfel (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 13 (2), 65–93.
H. Tajfel , & J. C. Turner (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
G. G. van de Bunt , R. P. M. Wittek & M. C. de Klepper (2005). The evolution of intra-organizational trust networks - The case of a German paper factory: An empirical test of six trust mechanisms. International Sociology, 20 (3), 339–369.
M. A. J. van Duijn , E. P. H. Zeggelink , M. Huisman , F. N. Stokman , & F. W. Wasseur (2003). Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27 (2–3), 153–191.
L. M. Verbrugge (1977). Structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56 (2), 576–597.
C. Werner , & P. Parmelee (1979). Similarity of activity preference among friends - those who play together stay together. Social Psychology, 42 (1), 62–66.
A. Wimmer , & K. Lewis (2010). Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on facebook. American Journal of Sociology, 116 (2), 583–642.