Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Power-relational core–periphery structures: Peripheral dependency and core dominance in binary and valued networks

  • CARL NORDLUND (a1) (a2) (a3)

Abstract

With origins in post-war development thinking, the core–periphery concept has spread across the social and, increasingly, the natural sciences. Initially reflecting divergent socioeconomic properties of geographical regions, its relational connotations rapidly led to more topological interpretations. In today's network science, the standard core–periphery model consists of a cohesive set of core actors and a peripheral set of internally disconnected actors. Exploring the classical core–periphery literature, this paper finds conceptual support for the characteristic intra-categorical density differential. However, this literature also lends support to the notions of peripheral dependency and core dominance, power-relational aspects that existing approaches do not capture. To capture such power-relations, this paper suggests extensions to the correlation-based core–periphery metric of Borgatti and Everett (2000). Capturing peripheral dependency and, optionally, core dominance, these extensions allow for either measuring the degree of such power-relational features in given core–periphery partitions, or as part of a criteria function to search for power-relational core–periphery structures. Applied to the binary and valued citation data in Borgatti and Everett (2000), the proposed extensions seemingly capture dependency and dominance features of core–periphery structures. This is particularly evident when, circling back to the original domains of the concept, examining the network of European commodity trade in 2010.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Amin, S. (1976). Unequal development: An essay on the social formations of peripheral capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Baker, D. R. (1992). A structural analysis of social work journal network: 1985–1986. Journal of Social Service Research, 15 (3–4), 153168.
Bauer, P. T. (1954). West African trade: A study of competition, oligarchy, and monopoly in a changing economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Berman, B. J. (1974). Clientelism and neocolonialism: Center-periphery relations and political development in African states. Studies in Comparative International Development, 9 (2), 325.
Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (2000). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21 (4), 375395.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. London: SAGE Publications.
Bousquet, N. (2012). Core, semiperiphery, periphery; a variable geometry presiding over conceptualization. In Babones, S. & Chase-Dunn, C. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of world-systems analysis (pp. 123124). New York: Routledge.
Boyd, J. P., Fitzgerald, W. J., & Beck, R. J. (2006). Computing core/periphery structures and permutation tests for social relations data. Social Networks, 28 (2), 165178.
Boyd, J. P., Fitzgerald, W. J., Mahutga, M. C., & Smith, D. A. (2010). Computing continuous core/periphery structures for social relations data with MINRES/SVD. Social Networks, 32 (2), 125137.
Breiger, R. L. (1981). Structures of economic interdependence among nations. In Blau, P. M. & Merton, R. K. (Eds.), Continuities in structural inquiry (pp. 353380). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
Breiger, R. L., Boorman, S. A., & Arabie, P. (1975). An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12 (3), 328383.
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1967). Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Chan, S. (1982). Cores and Peripheries Interaction Patterns in Asia. Comparative Political Studies, 15 (3), 314340.
Chase-Dunn, C. K. (1998). Global formation: Structures of the world-economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Chase-Dunn, C. K., & Grimes, P. (1995). World-systems analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 387417.
Chase-Dunn, C. K., & Hall, T. D. (Eds.) (1991). Core/periphery relations in precapitalist worlds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Condliffe, J. B. (1951). The commerce of nations. London: G. Allen & Unwin.
de Janvry, A. (1975). The political economy of rural development in Latin America: An interpretation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57 (3), 490499.
Della Rossa, F., Dercole, F., & Piccardi, C. (2013). Profiling core-periphery network structure by random walkers. Scientific Reports, 3, Article number 1467.
Dominguez, J. I. (1971). Mice that do not roar: Some aspects of international politics in the world's peripheries. International Organization, 25 (2), 175208.
Doreian, P., Batagelj, V., & Ferligoj, A. (2005). Generalized blockmodeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dos Santos, T. (1970). The structure of dependence. The American Economic Review, 60 (2), 231236.
Duvall, R. D. (1978). Dependence and dependencia theory: Notes toward precision of concept and argument. International Organization, 32 (01), 5178.
Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2000). Peripheries of cohesive subsets. Social Networks, 21 (4), 397407.
Frank, A. G. (1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: New York University Press.
Galtung, J. (1966a). East-West interaction patterns. Journal of Peace Research, 3 (2), 146177.
Galtung, J. (1966b). Small groups theory and the theory of international relations. Presented at the Lecture at the 75th Anniversary of the University of Chicago, Chicago.
Galtung, J. (1968). Small group theory and the theory of international relations: A study in isomorphism. In Kaplan, M. A. (Ed.), New approaches to international relations (pp. 270302). New York: St. Martin's Press.
Galtung, J. (1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8 (2), 81117.
Gills, B., & Frank, A. G. (Eds.) (2014). The world system: Five hundred years or five thousand? New York: Routledge.
Gleditsch, N. P. (1967). Trends in world airline patterns. Journal of Peace Research, 4 (4), 366408.
Gochman, C. S., & Ray, J. L. (1979). Structural Disparities in Latin America and Eastern Europe, 1950-1970. Journal of Peace Research, 16 (3), 231254.
Hojman, D. A., & Szeidl, A. (2008). Core and periphery in networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 139 (1), 295309.
Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Krugman, P. R. (1998). What's new about the new economic geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14 (2), 717.
Lee, S. H., Cucuringu, M., & Porter, M. A. (2014). Density-based and transport-based core-periphery structures in networks. Physical Review E, 89 (3), 032810.
Lloyd, P., Mahutga, M. C., & Leeuw, J. D. (2015). Looking Back and Forging Ahead: Thirty Years of Social Network Research on the World-System. Journal of World-Systems Research, 15 (1), 4885.
Love, J. L. (1980). Raul Prebisch and the Origins of the doctrine of unequal exchange. Latin American Research Review, 15 (3), 4572.
McKenzie, N. (1977). Centre and periphery: The marriage of two minds. Acta Sociologica, 20 (1), 5574.
Meier, G. M., & Baldwin, R. E. (1957). Economic development: Theory, history, policy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mullins, N. C., Hargens, L. L., Hecht, P. K., & Kick, E. L. (1977). The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study. American Sociological Review, 42 (4), 552562.
Muñiz, A. S. G., & Carvajal, C. R. (2006). Core/periphery structure models: An alternative methodological proposal. Social Networks, 28 (4), 442448.
Nemeth, R. J., & Smith, D. A. (1985). International trade and world-system structure: A multiple network analysis. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 8 (4), 517560.
Nordlund, C. (2010). Social ecography; international trade, network analysis, and an Emmanuelian conceptualization of ecological unequal exchange. Lund: Department of Social and Economic Geography, Lund University. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1606296.
Nordlund, C. (2016). A deviational approach to blockmodeling of valued networks. Social Networks, 44, 160178.
Oman, C. P., & Wignaraja, G. (1991). The postwar evolution of development thinking. Macmillan.
Prebisch, R. (1950). The economic development of latin america and its principal problems. New York: United Nations, Dept. of Economic Affairs.
Rokkan, S., & Urwin, D. W. (1983). Economy, Territory, identity: Politics of West European peripheries. London: SAGE Publications.
Rombach, M. P., Porter, M. A., Fowler, J. H., & Mucha, P. J. (2014). Core-periphery structure in networks. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 74 (1), 167190.
Smith, D. A., & White, D. R. (1992). Structure and dynamics of the global economy: Network analysis of international trade 1965–1980. Social Forces, 70 (4), 857893.
Snyder, D., & Kick, E. L. (1979). Structural position in the world system and economic growth, 1955–1970: A multiple-network analysis of transnational interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 10961126.
So, A. Y. (1990). Social change and development: Modernization, dependency and world-system theories. London: SAGE Publications.
Vanolo, A. (2010). The border between core and periphery: Geographical representations of the world system. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 101 (1), 2636.
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: Concepts for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16 (04), 387415.
Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world-economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81 (4), 730780.

Keywords

Power-relational core–periphery structures: Peripheral dependency and core dominance in binary and valued networks

  • CARL NORDLUND (a1) (a2) (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed