Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Simulating network intervention strategies: Implications for adoption of behaviour

  • JENNIFER BADHAM (a1), FRANK KEE (a1) and RUTH F. HUNTER (a1)
Abstract

This study uses simulation over real and artificial networks to compare the eventual adoption outcomes of network interventions, operationalized as idealized contagion processes with different sets of seeds. While the performance depends on the details of both the network and behaviour adoption mechanisms, interventions with seeds that are central to the network are more effective than random selection in the majority of simulations, with faster or more complete adoption throughout the network. These results provide additional theoretical justification for utilizing relevant network information in the design of public health behavior interventions.

Copyright
References
Hide All
An, W., & Liu, Y.-H. (2016). Keyplayer: An R package for locating key players in social networks. The R Journal, 8 (1), 257268. R package version 1.0.1.
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286 (5439), 509512.
Berkman, L. F., Kawachi, I., & Glymour, M. M. (eds). (2014). Social epidemiology. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., & Sailer, L. (1980). Informant accuracy in social network data IV: A comparison of clique-level structure in behavioral and cognitive network data. Social Networks, 2 (3), 191218.
Borgatti, S. P. (2006). Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 12 (1), 2134.
Campbell, R., Starkey, F., Holliday, J., Audrey, S., Bloor, M., Parry-Langdon, N., Hughes, R., & Moore, L. (2008). An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): A cluster randomised trial. The Lancet, 371 (9624), 15951602.
Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagion and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113 (3), 702734.
Costenbader, E., & Valente, T. W. (2003). The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Social Networks, 25 (4), 283307.
Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695.
Erdős, P., & Rényi, A. (1960). On the evolution of random graphs. Publications of the Institute of Mathematics, Hungarian Academy of Science, 5, 1760.
Kapferer, B. (1972). Strategy and transaction in an African factory: African workers and Indian management in a Zambian town. Manchester, UK, Manchester University Press.
Kelly, J.A., & Stevenson, L.Y. (1995). Opinion leader HIV Prevention Training Manual. Milwaukee, WI: Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin.
Kim, D. A., Hwong, A. R., Stafford, D., Hughes, D. A., OMalley, A. J., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2015). Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: A cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 386 (9989), 145153.
Latkin, C. A., & Knowlton, A. R. (2015). Social network assessments and interventions for health behavior change: A critical review. Behavioral Medicine, 41 (3), 9097.
Leskovec, J., & Faloutsos, C. (2006). Sampling from large graphs. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, pp. 631–636.
MacRae, D. (1960). Direct factor analysis of sociometric data. Sociometry, 23 (4), 360371.
Molloy, M., & Reed, B. (1995). A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence. Random structures & algorithms, 6 (2–3), 161180.
Noh, J. D., & Rieger, H. (2004). Random walks on complex networks. Physical Review Letters, 92 (Mar), 118701.
Perkins, J. M., Subramanian, S.V., & Christakis, N. A. (2015). Social networks and health: A systematic review of sociocentric network studies in low- and middle-income countries. Social Science & Medicine, 125 (Jan), 6078.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Shakya, H. B., et al. (2017). Exploiting social influence to magnify population-level behaviour change in maternal and child health: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of network targeting algorithms in rural Honduras. BMJ Open, 7 (3), e012996.
Thiele, J. C., & Grimm, V. (2010). NetLogo meets R: Linking agent-based models with a toolbox for their analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25 (8), 972974.
Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18 (1), 6989.
Valente, T. W. (2012). Network interventions. Science, 337 (6090), 4953.
Valente, T. W., & Davis, R. L. (1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566 (1), 5567.
Valente, T. W., Palinkas, L. A., Czaja, S., Chu, K.-H., & Brown, C. H. (2015). Social network analysis for program implementation. PLoS ONE, 10 (6), e0131712.
Wickham, H. (2009). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.
Wickham, H., & Francois, R. (2016). Dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.5.0.
Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Tech. rept. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Zachary, W. W. (1977). An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. Journal of Anthropological Research, 33 (4), 452473.
Zhang, J., Shoham, D. A., Tesdahl, E., & Gesell, S. B. (2015). Network interventions on physical activity in an afterschool program: An agent-based social network study. American Journal of Public Health, 105 (S2), S236S243.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Network Science
  • ISSN: 2050-1242
  • EISSN: 2050-1250
  • URL: /core/journals/network-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Badham et al. supplementary material
Badham et al. supplementary material 1

 PDF (504 KB)
504 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 57 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 410 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 16th May 2018 - 21st August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.