Entering Clara Schumann's Creative World
Figures 1 and 2 allow us to enter into Clara Schumann's creative world in two markedly different ways. In Figure 1, our attention is drawn from the poise of Schumann's engagement with the piano, her hand placed carefully on the keys, to the music on the stand, an excerpt from the finale of her Op. 7 Concerto, composed during her teens. In Figure 2, which captures Schumann and Joseph Joachim in the act of performance, the visceral dimension of her creativity becomes clearer. Here we are invited to trace Schumann's bodily engagement with the instrument into the realm of the sonic, to imagine the sound of virtuosic display that is rooted in the physical and simultaneously suggestive of something beyond its reach. Spanning the period from her prodigious teenage years to her early maturity, these images encapsulate facets of creativity central to this special issue – Schumann the composer, the pianist, the collaborator, the virtuoso.
Fig. 1 Clara Wieck at the age of 15. Julius Giere, Hannover, 1835 (lithograph). Manskopf Collection | Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg (Frankfurt am Main)
Fig. 2 Clara Schumann and Joseph Joachim in concert. Adolph Friedrich Erdmann von Menzel, 1854 (pastel drawing). Private collection | Peter Willi, Bridgeman Images
The portrayal of Schumann in these images chimes with tropes that run through her reception history. Prominent among these is the view of Schumann as a ‘priestess’ – that is, as a loyal, dignified pianist deeply invested in the programming of Austro-German music, particularly that of Beethoven, J.S. Bach, Felix Mendelssohn, her husband Robert Schumann, and Johannes Brahms.Footnote 1 Yet, as recent studies by April Prince have shown, the priestess ideology conceals as much as it reveals about Schumann's contributions to nineteenth-century performance culture.Footnote 2 A contrasting strand of her pianism – emerging as early as the 1830s when Julius Giere composed his portrait – pertains to the notion of the prophetess. Underpinning this mode of performance is, as Amanda Lalonde shows, ‘a strong demonstration of personality and a sense of abandon cultivated through an improvisatory character and bold physicality’.Footnote 3 If the priestess ideology is bound up with the ‘self-effacing’ portrayal of a composer's ideals, the prophetic act represents a mode of ‘feminine ephemeral authorship’.Footnote 4 The comparison between priestess and prophetess is neither straightforward, nor easy to disentangle, yet both feed into the ways in which Schumann positioned herself at what Alexander Stefaniak calls the ‘cutting edge’ of popular pianism.Footnote 5 Intricately connected with this are the ways in which her performances conveyed a sense of interiority, something that Stefaniak defines as an elevation of virtuosity that transcends the physical. This resonates with what is conjured by the image of Schumann and Joachim shown in Figure 2.Footnote 6
This journal issue – featuring four articles, two CD reviews, and a score review – opens up ways of thinking about Schumann's creativity and legacies that both complement and put pressure on received ideas about female authorship.Footnote 7 It moves beyond assessing legacy in terms of works, an approach that is familiar from the figure of the ‘great’ male composer, towards an emphasis on the plurality of creative endeavour, its slippages between text and performance, historical context and technological reinvention. Each article addresses a distinct aspect of Schumann's legacies – Schumann and the cadenza, Schumann and photography, Schumann and floral poetics, Schumann on film – and collectively they contribute to a richer understanding of the changing portrayal of her personal and artistic demeanour through the ages and the ways in which her artistry has inspired subsequent generations of musicians.
Changing Images
One constant in the literature grappling with Clara Schumann's legacies is biographical output, against which the images of Schumann highlighted above come into sharper focus. Amid this landscape are two distinct yet complementary strands of research: one emerging from Nancy Reich's Clara Schumann: The Artist and the Woman,Footnote 8 the other stemming from the work of Beatrix Borchard and Janina Klassen,Footnote 9 and given new impetus in the recent biographies by Borchard and Irmgard Knechtges-Obrecht,Footnote 10 both released on the foot of the 2019 bicentenary of Schumann's birth. These biographical developments are enriched by the efforts invested in the (ongoing) publication of diaries and letters, sources that add crucial details to the emerging picture of Schumann's life and art.Footnote 11 These two strands reflect what Laura Hamer describes as the first and second ‘waves of feminist music scholarship’.Footnote 12 Reich's biography is pioneering for the degree to which it unearthed primary source documents and gave a new level of recognition to Schumann's life. Borchard, Knechtges-Obrecht, and Klassen have the benefit of greater chronological and critical distance, as well as access to the more recent editions of letters published by the Schumann Haus in Zwickau which is transforming our understanding of Clara Schumann and her networks. Each of their books interrogates biographical forms of representation, and brings a heightened awareness to the socio-political purposes such sources can serve. This ‘second wave of feminist musicology’, as Hamer puts it, broadens out from a focus on composers (an approach which, she argues, runs the risk of replicating patriarchal historiographical tendencies of the ‘great’ life), rendering a more richly socio-politically varied, and therefore a more inclusive view of Schumann's life that is in keeping with a meta-biographical approach to life writing.Footnote 13
To engage with the figure of Clara Schumann is not only to re-evaluate her work as performer, composer and teacher, but also to explore the ways in which Schumann herself played a pivotal role in creating her identity and shaping her legacy for posterity, what Borchard calls the Schumann ‘concept’.Footnote 14 This unique role of Schumann's agency, as explored in what follows, nonetheless has an ambivalent relationship with the question of legacy shaped posthumously or without any input from the individual in question.
Addressing such issues requires navigating the fluid boundaries between biography, metabiography, compositional lineages, reception history and the questions that arise therein:Footnote 15 to what extent are legacies grounded in historical reality? What role does mythmaking and storytelling play in the construction of identity? What do legacies reveal about the times and cultures that give rise to them? In what ways do ideas of gender and class play out in the narration of musicians’ lives? And to what extent do scholarly accounts align with – or depart from – fictional legacies cultivated by the popular imagination?
These questions are especially pertinent in the case of Clara Schumann, for whom an awareness of the public eye figured prominently in the ways she navigated the personal and the professional realms. Traces of this are palpable throughout Schumann's own writings and correspondence, wherein she positions herself as someone immersed in artistic endeavour while also acutely aware of the socio-cultural pressures under which she lived and worked. Rarely does Schumann appear to be writing for herself; even in that most personal format – the diary – one is aware of the weight of posterity and the impression of reading material penned for the wider world as much as for herself.Footnote 16 Also imbricated in this is the way Schumann defined herself (both personally and creatively) in relation to Robert, a partnership that has captured the imagination in myriad ways since their lifetime: from the now-problematized view of Clara as muse to Robert, to the deeper appreciation of the ways in which their lives and art were not only entwined but mutually enriching.Footnote 17 These aspects move beyond the personal and/or the curated, to thinking about the malleability of such constructions in contexts over which she had little control.Footnote 18 There are gaps, invitations to confront what is known and unknown, as Schumann's legacies form at the intersection of myth and reality, fact and fiction.Footnote 19
Schumann's Creativity Reconsidered
The complex nature of Clara Schumann's creative persona (and its portrayal in the musical imagination) is explored in multifarious ways in this special issue. In ‘Creativity, Performance and Problems of Authorship: Clara Schumann's Cadenzas for Mozart's D minor Concerto, K466’, Christian Leitmeir explores the distinct facets of Schumann's pianism – her engagement with music of the past, the fluidity between improvisation and composition, and ideas of ephemeral authorship – as manifested in her approach to the cadenza. Problematizing the notion of authorship as fixed and monolithic, Leitmeir situates Schumann's cadenza in a nexus of shared practices that extend from Brahms (whose cadenza for K466 left an imprint on hers) back to Mozart and Beethoven, and forward to Anton Rubinstein. His approach illuminates Schumann's engagement with the wider culture of nineteenth-century cadenzas, and the ways in which she navigated the boundaries between improvisation, composition and corporeal memories of music past and present. Leitmeir's engagement with the cadenza as a multi-modal process encourages an understanding of Schumann's legacy as a pianist-composer that lies less in the score than in the creative exchanges among musicians, in the slippages between text and performance.
Schumann's legacies arise also at the intersection of compositional culture and material culture, as Christopher Parton explores here apropos Schumann's engagement with flowers (‘Speech and Silence: Encountering Flowers in the Lieder of Clara Schumann’). This extends from her personal interest in flower books, as reflected in the Blumenbuch für Robert, to her creative output, where she cultivated the ‘language of flowers’, Blumensprache, as a key aspect of her Lied aesthetic. Parton embarks on a rich exploration of how flowers – the archetypal symbols of German Romantic literature – were discursively mediated in male-authored literature, the inexhaustible polysemy of flowers being closely associated with the ineffable or the unknown. His article is bound up with the question of how nineteenth-century women authors were therefore faced with a floral poetics that slipped freely between silence and specificity, and between the objectivity and subjectivity of both flowers and women. In his interrogation of this discourse as it relates to the legacy of Clara Schumann, Parton shows that ‘her subtle navigation of this floral mutability reflects a unique aspect of her mode of authorship’.
A curiosity about modes of authorship, and the extent to which Schumann exerted control over her public image, also underpins (albeit with a different critical slant) April Prince's exploration of ‘The Technological Priestess: The Piano Recital, Photography, and Clara Schumann’. Probing the historical coincidences between the ‘invention’ of the piano recital and the photograph, and the impact of these technologies on the nineteenth-century artistic psyche, Prince explores the discourses that engulfed these musical and visual technologies as they relate to Clara Schumann and the construction of identity. In doing so, she further charts how Schumann herself cultivated a safe and socially acceptable public identity with her mass-produced photographs, and especially her cartes-de-visite.
Shifting the focus from Schumann's lifetime to her reception in German film, in ‘The Socio-Political Faces of Clara Schumann on German Film’, Nicole Grimes shows how successive periods of German political history each crafted their own image of this powerful musical figure. Grimes explores the implications of three such constructions: Schumann as seen through the lens of World War II, Schumann against the backdrop of East Germany behind the iron curtain and, finally, Schumann through the feminist lens of a West German filmmaker following German reunification. Emerging from Grimes's discussion is a picture of the extent to which these films capture or distort the historical realities of Schumann's life, and of how such portrayals relate to the shifting socio-cultural climate of German history. She thus offers fresh ways of thinking about film as a medium through which to (re)define creative legacies at the intersection of biography, metabiography, and reception history.
Continuing the conversation are the reviews by Joao Martins and Cheryl Tan of recent recordings of Schumann's Lieder and piano music, together with Joe Davies's review of the Bärenreiter edition of Schumann's Three Romances for Violin and Piano, Op. 22. Dialogues between performance and scholarship, central to all three reviews, come to the fore in Davies's contribution through excerpts from a conversation with pianist Lorna Griffitt, whose recording of the Op. 22 Romances with violinist Haroutune Bedelian has recently been released under the title Romantic Music of Robert, Clara, and Johannes. Footnote 20 Griffitt's insights, ranging from practical matters of notation to the tactile qualities of Schumann's music – how it feels under the hands and fingers – capture the slippages between text and performance that run through this special issue in myriad forms. All three reviews place a spotlight on Schumann's compositional voice – sonically and textually – while situating her music within the context of her work as teacher and performer, or in relation to stylistic and aesthetic discourses (such as preluding and improvisation) that shaped her artistic outlook. They thus encourage us to problematize the nexus of myths surrounding Schumann the composer – as represented by her oft-quoted diary entry that ‘I once believed that I possessed creative talent, but I have given up this idea; a woman must not desire to compose – there has never yet been one able to do it. Should I expect to be the one?’Footnote 21 – and to listen again to her musical creativity.
As the discussion above indicates, and as the articles and reviews to follow demonstrate, the last two hundred years have witnessed manifold ways of thinking about Clara Schumann's artistic, creative and performative personae. These include Schumann as a performer, an improviser, a virtuoso, to a composer, a priestess, a prophetess, a celebrity, and a curator of flowers and photographs. In all instances, Schumann's creative identities and legacies are open to new ways of being contextualized in both historical and contemporary contexts. This journal issue initiates important conversations and provides some constructive starting points for considering the nature of Clara Schumann's identities and their legacies, and for pondering how Clara Schumann can help us to think afresh about identity and legacy as concepts.
