Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T09:45:57.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Workshopping Participation in Music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2013

Kazuhiro Jo*
Affiliation:
IAMAS, 3-95, Ryoke-cho, Ogaki-shi, Gifu-ken, JAPAN 503-0014
Adam Parkinson*
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW, UK
Atau Tanaka*
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW, UK

Abstract

This paper presents a process-based approach to considering workshops as a route to participation in collective creative musical practice. We evoke the notion of the Music One Participates In, which focuses on a shift from the listener-as-consumer to participant-actor actively engaged in sound perception and production. We look at the range of different methods that make up the term ‘workshop’, as well as emergent relationships between facilitator and participant in creative do-it-yourself activities to frame our discussion of participatory music practice. We then examine the nature of participation across a range of disciplines from social and cognitive science through human computer interaction to radical and contemporary art, and identify possible contradictions in horizontal utopian organisational models. With this conceptual frame as a backdrop, we present four types of workshop that we have conducted across time at different sites with diverse groups of participants. We apply concepts from the participation literature to analyse our music workshops, and attempt to reconcile the potentially diverging agendas of facilitator and participant to arrive at a process-based view of ‘workshopping’.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J., Galani, A., Jo, K. 2009. An Ecology of Practice: Chiptune Marching Band, Proceedings of ACM Creativity and Cognition Conference 2009, New York: ACM Press, 347–8.Google Scholar
Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4): 216224.Google Scholar
Attali, J. 1985. Noise: The Political Economy of Music, trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1977a. Musica Practica. In Image-Music-Text. New York: Hill and Wang, 149154.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1977b. The Death of the Author. In Image-Music-Text. New York: Hill and Wang, 142148.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. 1936. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, ed. H. Arendt, trans. H. Zohn. New York: Schocken, 1978, 217253.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Boden, M. 1991. The Creative Mind: Myths & Mechanisms. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Buechley, L., Rosner, D., Paulos, E., Williams, A. 2009. DIY and CHI: Methods, Communities, and Values of Reuse and Customization. In CHI'09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 48234826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1997. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Czyzewski, P., Johnson, J., Roberts, E. 1990. Introduction: Purpose of PDC-90. In Proceedings of the Conference on Participatory Design, PDC'90. Palo Alto, CA: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, ii–iii.Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1959. The Poetics of the Open Work. In C. Cox (ed.) Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music. New York: Continuum, 1999, 167175.Google Scholar
Foster, H. 2004. Chat Rooms. In C. Bishop (ed.) Participation. London and Cambridge, MA: Whitechapel Gallery/The MIT Press, 2006, 190195.Google Scholar
Frieling, R. 2008. Toward Participation in Art. In R. Frieling (ed.) The Art of Participation: 1950 to Now. London: Thames & Hudson, 3249.Google Scholar
Giaccardi, E. 2005. Metadesign as an Emergent Design Culture. Leonardo Music Journal 38.4: 342349.Google Scholar
Goodman, E., Rosner, D.K. 2011. From Garments to Gardens: Negotiating Material Relationships Online and ‘By Hand’. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2011. New York: ACM Press, 22572266.Google Scholar
Hart, R.A. 1992. Children's Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. Innocenti Essays No. 4. Florence: UNICEF International Child Development Centre.Google Scholar
Jo, K., Tanaka, A. 2009. The Music One Participates In. In F. Schroeder (ed.) Performing Technology: User Content and the New Digital Media. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 3450.Google Scholar
Jo, K., Allen, J., Galani, A. 2009. Chiptune Marching Band: A Public Workshop and Performance. Proceedings of ACM Creativity and Cognition Conference 2009. New York: ACM Press, 481482.Google Scholar
Kaneko, T., Jo, K. 2011. Generative Music Workshop. In Proceedings of Culture and Computing 2011, 179–80.Google Scholar
Lave, J., Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, L. 2008. REMIX: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Moriwaki, K., Brucker-Cohen, J. 2006. Lessons from the Scrapyard: Creative Uses of Found Materials within a Workshop Setting. AI & Society 20(4): 506525.Google Scholar
Nieters, J., Bollman, E. 2011. Leading Change with Collaborative Design Workshops. Ext. Abs. CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 729739.Google Scholar
Preece, J., Schneiderman, B. 2009. The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1(1): 1332.Google Scholar
Richards, J. 2008. Getting the Hands Dirty. Leonardo Music Journal 18: 2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, C. 1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Spikell, M., Aghevli, B. 1999. The Workshop Method of Teaching: An Example from the Discipline of Mathematics Education. In Inventio 2(1).Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Kouichiro. 2010. An Empirical Study on Aeolian Harp as a ‘Listening’ Apparatus in Urban Environment. PhD thesis, Kyushu University.Google Scholar
Svanæs, D., Seland, G. 2004. Putting the Users Center Stage: Role Playing and Low-Fi Prototyping Enable End Users to Design Mobile Systems. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004. New York: ACM Press, 479–86.Google Scholar
Tanaka, A., Gaye, L., Richardson, R. 2010. Co-Production and Co-Creation: Creative Practice in Social Inclusion. In R. Nakatsu, N. Tosa, F. Naghdy, K. Wong and P. Codognet (eds.) Cultural Computing. Berlin: Springer, 169178.Google Scholar
Wang, T., Kaye, J. 2011. Inventive Leisure Practices: Understanding Hacking Communities as Sites of Sharing and Innovation. CH'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 263272.Google Scholar
Westerlund, B. 2007. A Workshop Method that Involves Users Talking, Doing and Making. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Homan-Machine Interaction, Human07, IEEE (March).Google Scholar
Williams, A.M., Irani, L. 2010. There's Methodology in the Madness: Toward Critical HCI Ethnography. Proceedings CHI ‘10 Extended Abstracts: 2725–34.Google Scholar