Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Activating Audiences: How spatial music can help us to listen

  • Emma-Kate Matthews (a1)

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of active listening when engaging new audiences with experimental and unfamiliar musical formats. Spatial music is examined as a physically immersive medium in which the audience is implicated as an active component in the execution of its performance. A brief account of the historic context of spatial music will be presented alongside speculation for the trajectory of its future; particularly its potential as a model for audience engagement. This article will first consider how spatially immersive performances have the capacity to activate listeners and how can this help to engage new audiences with new ways of listening. It will also question the notion of inhabiting spatial music, with an investigation of the multiple ways in which spatial music relates to physical space and the terms of its inhabitation. The concept of virtual listening will be discussed in response to trends towards passive hearing, as driven by recent technological developments in acoustic software and hardware, and the resultant abstraction of the spatial and social dynamics of sound in virtual space. The physiological and psychological differences between listening and hearing will also be examined as a means of establishing fundamental differences in the ways that we interact with music, and questioning what our listening habits tell us about audience engagement in the context of experimental music performance. This article will also question the individual roles of the musician, composer, architect/designer and audience in the ongoing responsibility to improve audience engagement in new, or unfamiliar musical works. Importantly, this article will also explicitly examine who we are referring to when we use the term ‘new audiences’. Major developments in acoustic technology during the last few decades have somewhat confused the diagram between music, space and listener. The understanding of which elements are active and which are passive is especially ambiguous at a time when ambisonic and binaural technologies have become developed enough to provide accurate simulations of the abstract, acoustic qualities of spaces, but on virtual terms. Architects, composers, musicians, engineers and audiences are at a crossroads in the development of new music and experimental, spatiosonic practice. ‘Spatiosonic’ is a hybrid term which is used throughout this article to describe work and phenomena which regard space (spatio) and sound (sonic) as equal, interactive partners. This article considers some of the opportunities and limitations at stake in current techniques of composition, performance and listening.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Bagenall, H. 1927. Influence of Buildings on Musical Tone. Music & Letters 8(4), 437–47.
Barthes, R. 1968. The Death of the Author, trans. R. Howard. University handout.
Barthes, R. 1985. Listening: The Responsibility of Forms, trans. R., Howard. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Brant, H., Childs, B. and Schwartz, E. 1967. Space as an Essential Aspect of Musical Composition: Contemporary Composers on Contemporary Music. New York: Da Capo Express.
Brant, H., Gagne, C., Caras, T. and Bagnato, G. 1982. Soundpieces: Interviews with American Composers. London: Scarecrow Press.
Byrne, D. 2012. How Music Works. Edinburgh: Canongate Books.
Chion, M. 2009. Guide to Sound Objects: Pierre Schaeffer and Musical Research, trans. J. Dack and C. North. Paris: Institut National De L’ Audiovisuel/Éditions Buchet/Chastel. http://ears.pierrecouprie.fr/spip.php?article3597 (viewed 18 May 2019).
Forsyth, M. 1985. Buildings for Music. The Architect, the Musician, and the Listener from the Seventeenth Century to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Groote, I. 2015. Annäherungen an Hör-Räume des Mittelalters. In Brech, M., Paland, M. and Paland, R. (eds.) Compositions for Audible Space, the Early Electroacoustic Music and its Contexts. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2744.
Hicks, M. and Asplund, C. 2012. Christian Wolff. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Horning, S. 2015. Spatial Effects: Sound, Space, and Technology in Twentieth Century Popular Music. In Brech, M., Paland, M. and Paland, R. (eds.) Compositions for Audible Space, The Early Electroacoustic Music and its Contexts. Bielefeld: Transcript, 135–49
Howard, D. and Moretti, L. 2009. Sound and Space in Renaissance Venice: Architecture, Music, Acoustics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Matthews, E.-K. 2019. Pre-concert talk for Construction 003: Axial/Regional. The Queen Elizabeth Hall, Southbank Centre, London.
Pallasmaa, J. 2005. The Eyes of the Skin, Architecture and the Senses. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Romanyshyn, R.D. 1989. Technology as Symptom & Dream. London: Routledge.
Sabine, W. 1922. Collected Papers on Acoustics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stockhausen, H. 1995. Helikopter-Streichquartett - musical score. Germany: Kürten Stockhausen-Verlag.
Varèse, E. 1967. Spatial Music in The Liberation of Sound: Contemporary Composers on Contemporary Music, ed. Childs, B and Elliot Schwartz, E. New York: Holt Rinehart.
Vitruvius, M. 1914; orig. pub. 1486. The Ten Books on Architecture, trans. H. Morgan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zvonar, R. 2000. 7.4. Multi-Channel Diffusion 2: An Extremely Brief History of Spatial Music in the 20th Century. Online Journal for Electroacoustic Practices. https://econtact.ca/7_4/zvonar_spatialmusic.html (accessed 18 May 2019).

Activating Audiences: How spatial music can help us to listen

  • Emma-Kate Matthews (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed