Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Ad-Hoc Aesthetics: Context-dependent composition strategies in music and sound art

  • Marinos Koutsomichalis (a1)
Abstract

Contemporary trains of thought largely denounce hylomorphism and a series of dichotomies of the past in favour of rather hybrid, all-inclusive and non-anthropocentric schemata. Yet, the former seem to still pervade our understanding of music and sound art in several respects. For many, composition is a primarily abstract process, musical instruments and audio-related technologies are fixed material means, and artists are creative individuals who are solely and primarily responsible for the artworks they produce. In this article a series of ad hoc and context-dependent compositional traits are scrutinised, with reference to theory as well as to actual artistic practice (both historical and contemporary), and are shown to transcend such assumptions in more or less straightforward ways. In particular, a series of practices is examined that revolves around material inquiry, anti-optimality, and hybrid, reflexive or ‘meta’ interfaces. More, DIWO (Do It With Others) approaches to composition are discussed and shown to echo adhocracy and contextual dependency in various respects and by means of emergent autopoiesis. Certain slants to DIWO are finally examined with respect to a series of powerful (in the author’s opinion) metaphors, namely emergence, transience and post-selfhood.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Email: me@marinoskoutsomichalis.com
References
Hide All
Albert, J. 2012. Improvisation as Tool and Intention: Organizational Practices in Laptop Orchestras and their Effect on Personal Musical Approaches. Critical Studies in Improvisation/Études critiques en improvisation 8 (1). www.criticalimprov.com/article/view/1558/2685 (accessed 20 November 2017).
Batty, R. 2010. Buried in Sound. Musique Machine. www.musiquemachine.com/articles/articles_template.php?id=160 (accessed 13 May 2016).
Bourriaud, N., Pleasance, S., Woods, F. and Copeland, M. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les presses du réel.
Bowers, J. and Archer, P. 2005. Not Hyper, Not Meta, Not Cyber but Infra-instruments. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
Bowers, J. and Villar, N. 2006. Creating Ad Hoc Instruments With Pin&Play&Perform. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Paris: IRCAM Centre Pompidou.
Cisneros, R. J. 2015. Hyperobject. Vivapunani. http://vivapunani.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Hyperobject (accessed 12 May 2016).
Cobussen, M. 2007. The Trojan Horse: Epistemological Explorations Concerning Practice Based Research. Dutch Journal of Music Theory 12: 1833.
Drever, J. L. 2009. Soundwalking: Aural Excursions into the Everyday. In J. Saunders (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Experimental Music. Burlington, UK: Ashgate.
Feyerabend, P. 1993. Against Method. New York: Verso.
Feyerabend, P. 1996. Theoreticians, Artists and Artisans. Leonardo 29(1): 2328.
Frayling, C. 1993. Research in Art and Design. London: Royal College of Art.
Fiebrink, R., Cook, P., Smallwood, S., Trueman, D. and Wang, G. 2009. Laptop Orchestras and Machine Learning in Real-time Music Performance. Proceedings of the CHI 2009 Workshop on Computational Creativity Support. Boston.
Goriunova, O. 2012. Art Platforms and Cultural Production on the Internet. Oxon: Routledge.
Hartley, J. 2010. Silly Citizenship. Critical Discourse Studies 7(4): 233248.
Hatch, M. 2014. The Maker Movement Manifesto. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Hayles, K. 2014. Speculative Aesthetics and Object-Oriented Inquiry (ooi). Speculations V: 158179.
Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ikoniadou, E. 2014. The Rhythmic Event: Art, Media, and the Sonic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ingold, T. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Oxford: Routledge.
Jo, K., Parkinson, A. and Tanaka, A. 2013. Workshopping Participation in Music. Organised Sound 18(3): 282291.
Jones, S. 2000. Music and the Internet. Popular Music 19: 217230.
Kelsey, S. 2010. Hylomorphism in Aristotle’s Physics. Ancient Philosophy 30(1): 107124.
Koutsomichalis, M. 2015. A Hypermedia and Project-based Approach to Music, Sound and Media Art. PhD thesis, De Montfort University, Leicester.
Koutsomichalis, M. 2016. Catalogue Æsthetics: Database in and as Music. In P. Kostagiolas, K. Martzoukou and C. Lavranos (eds.) Trends in Music Information Seeking, Behavior, and Retrieval for Creativity. Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.
Koutsomichalis, M. and Rodousakis, N. 2015. From (Not-)Doing-It-Yourself to Doing-It-(Cheaper)-With-Others: The Rise of a Workshop Culture in the Greek Economic Dystopia. In I. Theona and D. Charitos (eds.) Proceedings of the Hybrid City 3d International Conference. Athens: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kuznetsov, S. and Paulos, E. 2010. Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Projects, Communities, and Cultures. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. Reykjavik, Iceland.
Latour, B. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. 2012. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.
Malafouris, L. 2005. The Cognitive Basis of Material Engagement: Where Brain, Body and Culture Conflate. In C. Gosden, E. DeMarrais and C. Renfrew (eds.) Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Malafouris, L. 2008. At the Potter’s Wheel: An Argument for Material Agency. In C. Knappett and L. Malafouris (eds.) Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer US.
Malafouris, L. 2013. How Things Shape the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Manning, G. 2013. The History of ‘Hylomorphism’. Journal of the History of Ideas 74(2): 173187.
Manovich, L. 2009. The Practice of Everyday (Media) Life: From Mass Consumption to Mass Cultural Production. Critical Inquiry 35(2): 319331.
Maturana, H. and Varela, F. 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Heidelberg: Springer.
Medea Electronique. 2013. Koumaria Residency: A Fleeting Collective Experience (in Greek). Creativity Conference: Open & Economically Sustainable Models of Creative Production. Athens: Greek National Documentation Center.
Minsky, M. 1986. Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Nahm, M. C. 1956. The Artist as Creator, an Essay of Human Freedom. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
Narušytė, A. 2010. The Aesthetics of Boredom: Lithuanian Photography 1980–1990. Lithuania: VDA leidykla.
Novak, D. 2013. Japanoise: Music at the Edge of Circulation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Pickering, A. 2010. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Priest, E. 2013. Boring Formless Nonsense: Experimental Music and the Aesthetics of Failure. New York: Bloomsbury.
Richards, J. 2013. Beyond DIY in Electronic Music. Organised Sound 18(3): 274281.
Seo, H. 2003. The Shock of Boredom: The Aesthetics of Absence, Futility, and Bliss in Moving Images. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
Serra, R. 1992. From the Yale Lecture. In C. Harrison and P. Wood (eds.) Art in Theory 1900–1990: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Smallwood, S., Trueman, D., Cook, P. R. and Wang, G. 2008. Composing for Laptop Orchestra. Computer Music Journal 32(1): 925.
Smith, B. D. 2012. Telematic Composition. Doctoral diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Tanenbaum, J. G., Williams, A. M., Desjardins, A. and Tanenbaum, K. 2013. Democratizing Technology: Pleasure, Utility and Expressiveness in DIY and Maker Practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM.
Van Dijck, J. 2009. Users Like You? Theorizing Agency in User-generated Content. Media, Culture and Society 31(1): 4158.
Varela, F. 1991. Making It Concrete: Before, During and After Breakdowns. Rev In Psychopathologie 4: 435450.
Wang, G., Essl, G. and Penttinen, H. 2008. Do Mobile Phones Dream of Electric Orchestras. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Michigan: Michigan Publishing.
We have a situation. 2013. http://issuu.com/apo33/docs/whas-v11-web/23?e=6402316/5125267 (accesssed 14 May 2016).
Wikström, P. 2009. The Music Industry: Music in the Cloud. Malden, MA: Polity.
Williams, R. 2014. Anti-Musicality: An Interview with Romain Perrot of VOMIR. http://thequietus.com/articles/16050-romain-perrot-vomir-interview-harsh-noise-wall (accessed 12 May 2016).
Williamson, J. and Cloonan, M. 2007. Rethinking the Music Industry. Popular Music 26(02): 305322.
Wittgenstein, L., Hacker, P. and Schulte, J. 2010. Philosophical Investigations. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J. and Wensveen, S. 2011. Design Research Through Practice. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Organised Sound
  • ISSN: 1355-7718
  • EISSN: 1469-8153
  • URL: /core/journals/organised-sound
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 92 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 419 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 26th December 2017 - 19th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.