Skip to main content Accessibility help

Agility and Playfulness: Technology and skill in the performance ecosystem

  • Owen Green (a1)


Whilst it is common in much discourse around contemporary musical practices to emphasise the differences between digital and acoustic ways of making music, Simon Waters’ discussion of the Performance Ecosystem as an analytic perspective argues instead for a heightened sense of continuity (Waters 2007). This article lends support to this argument by developing an ecosystemically situated account of our relationships with technology and processes of skill formation. It is argued that this sense of continuity is justified, but that where differences of experiences do arise these are not, as sometimes supposed, an essential characteristic of digital technologies. On the basis that much of our skill formation consists of tacit knowledge, it is suggested that further discussion on how particular circumstances and skills arise would be revealing. Two possible headings for such discussion are suggested in the form of ‘Agility’ and ‘Playfulness’.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Archer, P. 2006. Intervention and Appropriation: Studies in the Aesthetics of the Homemade in Real-Time Electroacoustic Composition. ARiADATexts 5. (accessed on 14 November 2007).
Armstrong, N. 2006. An Enactive Approach to Digital Musical Instrument Design. PhD thesis. Princeton University. (accessed on 8 June 2009).
Attali, J. 1977. Noise: The Political Economy of Music. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.
Born, G. 2010. For a Relational Musicology: Music and Interdisciplinarity, Beyond the Practice Turn. Journal of the Royal Musical Association 135(2): 205243.
Bowers, J. 2003. Improvising Machines: Ethnographically Informed Design for Improvised Electroacoustic Music. ARiADATexts 4. (accessed on 27 October 2006).
Bown, O., Eldridge, A., McCormack, J. 2009. Understanding Interaction in Contemporary Digital Music: From Instruments to Behavioural Objects. Organised Sound 14(2): 188196.
Campbell, M., Greated, C., Myers, A. 2004. Musical Instruments: History, Technology, and Performance of Instruments of Western Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A. 2003. Natural Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clarke, E.F. 2005. Ways of Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collins, N. 2006. Handmade Electronic Music: The Art of Hardware Hacking. London: Routledge.
Collins, N. 2007. Live Coding Practice. Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME07): 112–16. (accessed on 8 January 2010).
Cook, N., Everist, M. 1999. Rethinking Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cook, P.R. 2004. Remutualizing the Musical Instrument: Co-Design of Synthesis Algorithms and Controllers. Journal of New Music Research 33(3): 315320.
Cutler, C. 2000. Plunderphonics. In S. Emmerson (ed.), Music, Electronic Media and Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate, 87114.
DeNora, T. 2000. Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Di Scipio, A. 1998. Questions Concerning Music Technology. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 3(2): 3140.
Di Scipio, A. 2003. ‘Sound is the Interface’: From Interactive to Ecosystemic Signal Processing. Organised Sound 8(3): 269277.
Dixon, M. 2006. Echo's Body: Play and Representation in Interactive Music Software. Contemporary Music Review 25(1–2): 1725.
Dreyfus, H.L. 1992. What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E. 1986. Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: The Free Press.
Eigenfeldt, A. 2008. Emergent Rhythms through Multi-agency in Max/MSP. In R. Kronland-Martinet, S. Ystad and K. Jensen (eds), Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval. Sense of Sounds: 4th International Symposium, CMMR 2007, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 27–31, 2007. Revised Papers. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 368379.
Emmerson, S. 2001. New Spaces/New Places: A Sound House for the Performance of Electroacoustic Music and Sonic Art. Organised Sound 6(2): 103105.
Emmerson, S. 2007. Living Electronic Music. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Essl, G., O'Modhrain, S. 2006. An Enactive Approach to the Design of New Tangible Musical Instruments. Organised Sound 11(3): 285296.
Feenberg, A. 1999. Questioning Technology. London: Routledge.
Feenberg, A. 2002. Transforming Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frith, S. 1996. Performing Rites: Evaluating Popular Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ingold, T. 2000. Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T. 2006. Walking the Plank: Meditations on a Process of Skill. In J. Dakers (ed.), Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework. New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 6580.
Jordà, S. 2004. Instruments and Players: Some Thoughts on Digital Lutherie. Journal of New Music Research 33(3): 321341.
Lewis, G. 1999. Interacting with Latter-Day Musical Automata. Contemporary Music Review 18(3): 99112.
Lewis, G. 2000. Too Many Notes: Computers, Complexity and Culture in Voyager. Leonardo Music Journal 10: 3339.
Magnusson, T. 2009. Of Epistemic Tools: Musical Instruments as Cognitive Extensions. Organised Sound 14(2): 168176.
Maturana, H., Varela, F. 1992. The Tree of Knowledge. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Plans Casal, D. 2008. Time After Time: Short-Circuiting the Emotional Distance Between Algorithm and Human Improvisors. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 2008. (accessed on 19 April 2009).
Porcello, T. 2004. Speaking of Sound. Social Studies of Science 34(5): 733758.
Rodgers, T. 2003. On the Process and Aesthetics of Sampling in Electronic Music Production. Organised Sound 8(3): 313320.
Schroeder, F., Rebelo, P. 2009. The Pontydian Performance: the Performative Layer. Organised Sound 14(2): 134141.
Schroeder, F., Renaud, A., Rebelo, P., Gualdas, F. 2007. Addressing the Network: Performative Strategies for Playing Apart. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 2007, 133140. (accessed on 8 January 2010).
Small, C. 1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performances and Listening. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
Smith, S. 2007. The Process of Collective Creation in the Composition of UK Hip-Hop Turntable Team Routines. Organised Sound 12(1): 7987.
Suchman, L. 2007. Human–Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sudnow, D. 2001. Ways of the Hand: A Rewritten Account. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Van Nort, D., Wanderley, M. 2006. The LoM Mapping Toolbox for Max/MSP/Jitter. Proceedings of the 2006 International Computer Music Conference (ICMC), 397–400. (accessed on 26 April 2011).
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vaughan, M. 1994. The Human-Machine Interface in Electroacoustic Music Compostion. Contemporary Music Review 10(2): 111127.
Waters, S. 2000. Beyond the Acousmatic: Hybrid Tendencies in Electroacoustic Music. In S. Emmerson (ed.), Music, Electronic Media and Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate, 5683.
Waters, S. 2007. Performance Ecosystems: Ecological Approaches to Musical Interaction. Proceedings of Electroacoustic Music Studies Network Conference 2007. (accessed on 14 November 2007).
Windsor, L. 2000. Through and Around the Acousmatic: The Interpretation of Electroacoustic Sounds. In S. Emmerson (ed.), Music, Electronic Media and Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate, 735.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Agility and Playfulness: Technology and skill in the performance ecosystem

  • Owen Green (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.