Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:45:01.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applying Kinaesthetic Empathy and Extended Mind Theory to Invasive and Discreet Instruments in Sound-Based Live Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

Neal Spowage*
Affiliation:
De Montfort University, Clephan Building, The Gateway, LE1 9BH

Abstract

I have taken the ambiguous psychology of Kinaesthetic Empathy and the relatively recent ideas that form Extended Mind Theory and re-contextualised them so they are relevant to sound-based live performance. I then used these psychologies as a guidance to investigate how we interact with discreet and invasive instruments by analysing specific examples of performance, sound installation and composition. I have defined ‘invasive and discreet’ by using examples of how these instruments are presented as objects in the context of performance. For example, the way in which an object or system can physically invade, and make use of, the performance space when employing technology and physical sculpture; or how an object or system can interact with the performer through tactility and psychological presence. During the process of defining discreet and invasive instruments I noted that there is no binary differentiation because the instruments denotation is dependent on context, sound palette and how they are interpreted as objects for creative expression by the performer. I concluded that the physicality of invasive instruments gives strength to the presentation of ideas in live performance. This is in opposition to discrete instruments which I argue are better suited to studio production or acousmatic performance.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. 1998. The Extended Mind. Analysis. 58(1): 719.Google Scholar
Ellison, C. 2013. Live Cut. www.pollyfibre.com/index.php?/projects/live-cut (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Gabo, N. and Pevsner, A. 1920. The Realistic Manifesto. Moscow: The Second State Publishing House.Google Scholar
Goodwin, J. C. 2015. A History of Modern Psychology. Hoboken: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. 2012. Building Recording Studios While Bradford Burned. In Z. Furness (ed.) Punkademics: The Basement Show in the Ivory Tower. London: Minor Compositions.Google Scholar
Hergenhahn, B. R. 1997. An Introduction to the History of Psychology. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Hinterding, J. 1995. Aeriology. www.haineshinterding.net/1995/05/06/aeriology/ (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Kahn, D. 2013. Earth Sound Earth Signal: Energies and Earth Magnitude in the Arts. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kirsh, D. 2014. The Importance of Chance and Interactivity in Dance. Pragmatics and Cognition. 22(1): 526.Google Scholar
Koustsomichalis, M. 2016. Inhibition. http://inhibition-eeg.com/ (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Kubisch, C. 2011. Electromagnetic Induction. www.christinakubisch.de/en/works/installations/2 (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Laban, R. 1966. Choreutics, annotated and ed. L. Ullmann. London: MacDonald and Evans.Google Scholar
Martín, C. B., Martínez, J. S., Ricchiuti, A., González, H. E. and Franco, C. H. 2012. Study of the Interference Affecting the Performance of the Theremin. International Journal of Antennas and Propogation. www.hindawi.com/journals/ijap/2012/348151/ (accessed 11 October 2018).Google Scholar
Maubrey, B. 2006. Peepers. www.benoitmaubrey.com/?p=352 (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Maxwell, . 1865. A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. and Heap, I. 2011. SoundGrasp: A Gestural Interface for the Performance of Live Music. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Oslo. NIME.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T., Madgwick, S., Rankine, S., Hilton, G., Freed, A. and Nix, A. 2014. Making the Most of Wi-Fi: Optimisations for Robust Wireless Live Music Performance. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. London.Google Scholar
MOMA, . 1968. 88mc Carrier Wave FM. www.moma.org/collection/works/137431 (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Nederberg, A. 2013. Review of Bodily Expression In Electronic Music: Perspectives On Reclaiming Performativity . Peters, D. Eckel, G. Dorschel, A (eds) (2012). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Njenga, J. K. and Fourie, L. C. H. 2010. The myths about e-learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2): 199212.Google Scholar
Norman, D. 1993. Things That Make Us Smart. New York: Diversion Books.Google Scholar
Nowitz, A. 2008a. Voice and Live-Electronics using Remotes as Gestural Controllers. eContact. 10(4). http://econtact.ca/10_4/nowitz_voicelive.html (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Nowitz, A. 2008b. Studies for Self Portrait. eContact. 10(4). http://econtact.ca/10_4/video/nowitz_selfportrait.mp4 (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Nowitz, A. 2015. Eine Raumvermessung. https://vimeo.com/179308709 (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Nowitz, A. 2016. Designing and Playing the Strophonion: Extending Vocal Art Performance Using a Custom Digital Musical Instrument. eContact. 18(3). http://econtact.ca/18_3/nowitz_strophonion.html (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Nowitz, A. and Schorno, D. 2011. The Strophonion Instrument Development. http://steim.org/projectblog/2012/01/02/alex-nowitz-the-Strophonion-instrument-development-2010-2011 (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. and Reason, M. 2012. Kinesthetic Empathy in Creative and Cultural Practices. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
Richards, J. 2012. Collateral Damage: John Richards. The Wire, 337. www.thewire.co.uk/in-writing/essays/collateral-damage_john-richards (accessed 11 Feb 2018)Google Scholar
Richards, J. 2013. Still. https://vimeo.com/76120821 (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Ross, E. 2008. Composing for the Theremin: Some Practical Issues. New Music USA, 5 November. https://nmbx.newmusicusa.org/Composing-for-the-Theremin-Some-Practical-Issues (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Science Museum. 1959. Oramics Machine. http://collection.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects/co8188395/oramics-machine-synthesizer (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Skuse, A. 2016. Balancing Act. http://ambleskuse.net/performances/ (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Sonami, L. 2001. The Ladys Glove. http://sonami.net/ladys-glove (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Strang, D. 2016. Transmission+Interference. www.davidstrang.co.uk/transmit.html (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Streb, E. 2010. How to Become an Extreme Action Hero. New York: Feminist Press.Google Scholar
Waisvisz, M. 1984. The Hands. www.crackle.org/TheHands.htm (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar

Discography

Lucier, A. 1982. Music for Solo Performer. New York: Lovely Music, LP 1014.Google Scholar

Videography

Burrows, J. 2002. Both Sitting Duet. www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyWwmHrmpxM&t=7s (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Burrows, J. 2005. The Quiet Dance. www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IqPdwpdshA (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar
Marino, J. 2009. Rot Blau. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftEd4CEhfMI&t=290s (accessed 11 February 2018).Google Scholar