Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:45:13.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Museum City: Improvisation and the narratives of space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2016

Franziska Schroeder*
Affiliation:
Sonic Arts Research Centre, School of Arts, English, and Languages, Queen’s University Belfast, Cloreen Park, BT7 1NN, Belfast

Abstract

This article provides four viewpoints on the narratives of space, allowing us to think about possible relations between sites and sounds and reflecting on how places might tell stories, or how practitioners embed themselves in a place in order to shape cultural, social and/or political narratives through the use of sound. I propose four viewpoints that investigate the relationship between sites and sounds, where narratives are shaped and made through the exploration of specific sonic activities. These are: sonic narrative of space, sonic activism, sonic preservation and sonic participatory action.

I examine each of these ideas, initially focusing in more detail on the first viewpoint, which provides the context for discussing and analysing a recent site-specific music improvisation project entitled ‘Museum City’, a work that aligns most closely with my proposal for a ‘sonic narrative of space’, while also bearing aspects of each of the other proposed viewpoints.

The work ‘Museum City’ by Pedro Rebelo, Franziska Schroeder, Ricardo Jacinto and André Cepeda specifically enables me to reflect on how derelict and/or transitional spaces might be re-examined through the use of sound, particularly by means of live music improvisation. The spaces examined as part of ‘Museum City’ constitute either deserted sites or sites about to undergo changes in their architectural layout, their use and sonic make-up. The practice in ‘Museum City’ was born out of a performative engagement with(in) those sites, but specifically out of an intimate listening relationship by three improvisers situated within those spaces.

The theoretical grounding for this article is situated within a wider context of practising and cognising musical spatiality, as proposed by Georgina Born (2013), particularly her proposition for three distinct lineages that provide an understanding of space in/and music. Born’s third lineage, which links more closely with practices of sound art and challenges a Euclidean orientation of pitch and timbre space, makes way for a heightened consideration of listening and ‘the place’ of sound. This lineage is particularly crucial for my discussion, since it positions music in relation to social experiences and the everyday, which the work ‘Museum City’ endeavoured to embrace.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agnew, J. 2011. Space and Place . In J. Agnew and D. Livingstone (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Geographical Knowledge. London: Sage. www.sscnet.ucla.edu/geog/downloads/856/416.pdf (accessed 17 September 2015).Google Scholar
Attali, J. 1985. Noise: Political Economy of Music. Trans. B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
BBC Worldservice Interview with John Drever. 2009. Q&A with an acoustic ecologist. www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/specialreports/2009/07/090703_sos_qawwithjohndrever.shtml (accessed 17 September 2015).Google Scholar
Bird, J., Curtis, B., Putnam, T. and Tickner, L., eds. 2012. Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change. Routledge.Google Scholar
Born, G., ed. 2013. Music, Sound and Space: Transformations of Public and Private Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, E. 1996. How to Get from Space to Place in a Fairly Short Stretch of Time: Phenomenological Prolegomena. In Senses of Place, S. Feld and K. Basso (eds.) Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, https://philosophydocuments.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/14-space-to-place.pdf (accessed 21 August 2016).Google Scholar
Drever, J. L. 2002. Sounding Dartmoor: A Case Study on the Soundscapes of Rural England at the Opening of the 21st Century. World Forum for Acoustic Ecology. http://research.gold.ac.uk/7839 (accessed 17 September 2015).Google Scholar
Elden, S. 2004. Understanding Henri Lefebvre: Theory and the Possible. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Feld, S. 1996. Waterfalls of Song. In S. Feld and K. Basso (eds.) Senses of Place. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Feld, S. 2004. Doing Anthropology in Sound. American Ethnologist 31(4). http://sed.ucsd.edu/files/2014/01/Feld_Brenneis-2004.pdf (accessed 18 September 2015).Google Scholar
Freire, P. 1993. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Goodman, S. 2010. Sonic Warfare. Sound, Affect, and the Ecology of Fear. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. D. and Stevens, C. S. 2013. Sound, Space and Sociality in Modern Japan. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B., Brenner, N. and Jones, M. 2008. Theorizing Sociospatial Relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26: 389401.Google Scholar
Kahn, D. 1999. Noise, Water, Meat: A History of Sound in the Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
LaBelle, B. 2006. Background Noise: Perspectives on Sound Art. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 1974[1991]. The Production of Space. Trans. D. Nicholson-Smith. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marques, P. A. M. and De Araújo, C. B. 2014. The Need to Document and Preserve Natural Soundscape Recordings as Acoustic Memories. Paper given at the 2014 Invisible Places Symposium, 18–20 July 2014, Viseu, Portugal. http://invisibleplaces.org/pdf/ip2014-marques.pdf (accessed 19 September 2015).Google Scholar
Rebelo, P. 2003. Performing Space. Organised Sound 8: 181186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebelo, P. 2014. The Local and the Distributed in the Sonic Arts. https://pedrorebelo.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/rebeloip2014.pdf (accessed 17 September 2015).Google Scholar
Revill, G. 2000. Music and the Politics of Sound: Nationalism, Citizenship, and Auditory Space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18: 597613. http://epd.sagepub.com/content/18/5/597.full.pdf+html (accessed 6 October 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russolo, L. 1913/2004. The Art of Noise (futurist manifesto, 1913). ubuclassics. (Orig. pub. as A Great Bear Pamphlet. Trans. Robert Filliou. 1967.) www.artype.de/Sammlung/pdf/russolo_noise.pdf (accessed 22 February 2016).Google Scholar
Sack, R. D. 1997. Homo Geographicus. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, R. M. 1994 [1977]. The Soundscape. Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester, NY: Destiny Books.Google Scholar
Schafer, R. M. 2016. The World Soundscape Project. www.sfu.ca/~truax/wsp.html (accessed 22 February 2016).Google Scholar
Stone-Davis, F. J. 2015. Worldmaking and Worldbreaking: Pussy Riot’s ‘Punk Prayer’. Contemporary Music Review (Special issue: Home: Creating and Inhabiting Place Through Musical Activity) 34(1): 101120.Google Scholar
Thrift, N. 2009. Space: The Fundamental Stuff of Human Geography. In N. J. Clifford and G. Valentine (eds.) Key Concepts in Geography. London: Sage, www.corwin.com/upm-data/9554_019254ch5.pdf (accessed 6 October 2015).Google Scholar
Tuan, Y. -F. 1974a. Space and Place: Humanistic Perspective. Progress in Geography 6: 211252.Google Scholar
Tuan, Y. -F. 1974b. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
WFAE. 2016. World Forum for Acoustic Ecology. http://wfae.net/ (accessed 22 February 2016).Google Scholar

Discography

Feld, S. 2001a. Bosavi: Rainforest Music from Papua New Guinea. 3CDs. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings.Google Scholar
Feld, S. 2001b. Rainforest Soundwalks: Ambiences of Bosavi, Papua New Guinea. CD. Santa Fe, NM: Earthear.Google Scholar