Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Proprioception in Visual Mental Imagery of Spaces while Deep Listening

  • Luca Forcucci (a1)

Abstract

This article explores the sense of proprioception within visual mental imagery. The research is based on an experiment named In/Pe (Intention/Perception) developed by the author. The analysis of the data investigates the perception by an audience of architectural spaces, as well as natural environments, in visual mental imageries, emerging from a focused listening process of three fixed-medium pieces, one sound installation and one performance. This highlights the idea of the experience of the artwork as a virtual constructed perception within one’s mind, an embodied experience that triggers the phenomenal world of sensation. The study examines what kind of spaces are visualised by the ‘beholder’. The overall agreement in how participants imagine spaces suggests that the perception is linked to their own bodies.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Artaud, A. 1958. The Theatre and its Double, trans. M. C. Richards. New York: Grove Press.
Bachelard, G. 1992. The Poetics of Space, trans. M. Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press.
Berlucchi, G. and Aglioti, S. M. 2009. The Body in the Brain Revisited. Experimental Brain Research 200(1): 2535.
Biggs, M. and Karlsson, H. 2011.The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. London: Routledge.
Blanke, O. 2012. Multisensory Brain Mechanisms of Bodily Self-Consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13: 556571.
Böhme, G. 1993. Atmosphere as the Fundamental Concept of a New Aesthetics. Thesis Eleven 36: 113126.
Brochard, R., Dufour, A. and Després, O. 2004. Effect of Musical Expertise on Visuospatial Abilities: Evidence from Reaction Times and Mental Imagery. Brain and Cognition 54: 103109.
Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. and Massumi, B. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
De Vignemont, F. 2010. Body Schema and Body Image – Pros and Cons. Neuropsychologia 48(3): 669680.
Dieguez, S. and Lopez, C. 2016. The Bodily Self: Insights from Clinical and Experimental Research. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 60(3): 198207.
Dixon, S. 2006. A History of Virtual Reality in Performance. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 2(1): 2354.
Forcucci, L. 2015. Mapping Dynamic Relations in Sound and Space Perception. PhD thesis, De Montfort University. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.679035
Forcucci, L. 2017a. Mechanisms of Listening and Spatial Mental Imagery. Bio-Creation and Peace Proceedings. Manizales, Colombia: ISEA (International Symposium of Electronic Arts).
Forcucci, L. 2018. Music for Brainwaves: Embodiment of Sound, Space and EEG Data. Body, Space & Technology 17(1): 7694.
Gallagher, S. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gaver, W. W. 1993. What in the World do we Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Source Perception. Ecological Psychology 5(1): 129.
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcour.
Griffero, T. 2014. Atmospheres: Aesthetics of Emotional Spaces. Surrey: Ashgate.
Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G. and Thompson, W. L. 2001. Neural Foundations of Imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2(9): 635642.
Landy, L. 2006. The Intention/Reception Project. in M. Simoni (ed.) Analytical Methods of Electroacoustic Music. New York: Routledge.
Landy, L. 2007. Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lefebvre, H. 2000. La Production de l’Espace, 4th edn. Paris: Editions Antropos.
Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the Virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Nancy, J. L. 2007. Listening, trans. Charlotte Mandell. New York: Fordham University Press.
Neuhaus, M. n.d. Water Whistle Series. www.max-neuhaus.info/soundworks/vectors/sensation/waterwhistle/Water_Whistle_Series.pdf (accessed September 2014).
Oiticica, H. 1965. Notes on the Parangolé – Anotaçoes Söbre o Parangolé. Exhibition Opinião 65. Published by the Artist, Rio de Janeiro: Museu de Arte Moderna.
Oliveros, P. 1974. Sonic Meditations. Sharon, VT: Smith.
Oliveros, P. 2005. Deep Listening: A Composer’s Sound Practice. Bloomington: iUniverse.com.
Oliveros, P. 2010. Sounding the Margins: Collected Writings 1992–2009. Kingston, NY: Deep Listening.
Osthoff, S. 2004. Lygia Clark and Hélio Oiticica: A Legacy of Interactivity and Participation for a Telematic Future. Leonardo on-line. www.leonardo.info/isast/spec.projects/osthoff/osthoff.html (accessed September 2014).
Oteri, F. J. 2004. Extremities: Maryanne Amacher. NewMusicBox. https://nmbx.newmusicusa.org/extremities-maryanne-amacher-in-conversation-with-frank-j-oteri/ (accessed January 2018).
Ouzounian, G. 2006. Embodied Sound: Aural Architectures and the Body. Contemporary Music Review 25(1–2): 6979. http://soundartarchive.net/articles/Ouzounian-2006-Aural architectures and the body.pdf (accessed September 2014).
Seth, A. K. 2013. Interoceptive Inference, Emotion, and the Embodied Self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(11): 565573.
Smetacek, V. and Mechsner, F. 2004. Making Sense. Nature 432: 21.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2013. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/ (accessed July 2015).
Tsakiris, M. 2009. My Body in the Brain: A Neurocognitive Model of Body-Ownership. Neuropsychologia 48(3): 703–!712.
Weale, R. 2006. Discovering How Accessible Electroacoustic Music Can Be: The Intention/Reception Project. Organised Sound 11(2): 189200.
Woelert, P. 2011. Human Cognition, Space, and the Sedimentation of Meaning. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10(1): 113137.
Zorn, J. 2008. Arcana III: Musicians on Music. New York: Hips Road.
Forcucci, L. 2017b. The Waste Land (cassette), Porto: Crónica Electrónica, Crónica 128∼2017.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Proprioception in Visual Mental Imagery of Spaces while Deep Listening

  • Luca Forcucci (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.