Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Sound-based Brutalism: An emergent aesthetic

  • Mo H. Zareei (a1), Dugal Mckinnon (a1), Dale A. Carnegie (a1) and Ajay Kapur (a2)

Cold, stripped-down, monochrome, pixelated, iterative, quantised, grid, pulse, glitch, noise: taken together, these words imply a growing aesthetic connection within a body of experimental and independent (or non-academic) sound-based artworks produced in the past few decades. Although realised in different mediums and belonging to different artistic categories, such works are connected through a certain aesthetic sensibility. Nevertheless, since the majority of these works have thus far received little scholarly attention, a framing discussion of the aesthetic principles and features that link them is overdue. This article examines this emergent phenomenon, accounting for the particular aesthetic features that connect such sound-based artworks, arguing for a more specific terminology to adequately account for this aesthetic across the various practices in which it is observed. Rejecting ‘minimalist’ as a descriptor, this article calls for an aesthetic frame of reference derived through Brutalism, understood as a crystallisation of key features of modernism and its various movements. The first author’s work is presented as a conscious effort to create sound art redolent of Brutalism, locating this work in the context of the revival of Brutalism in recent years, which, as will be argued, can be expanded to works from a wide range of contemporary artists and musicians.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

W. L. Ashline 2002. Clicky Aesthetics: Deleuze, Headphonics, and the Minimalist Assemblage of ‘Aberrations’. Strategies: Journal of Theory, Culture & Politics 15(1): 87101.

R. Banham 2011. The New Brutalism. October 136: 1928. Reprinted from Architectural Review (December 1955): 354–61.

K. Cascone 2000. The Aesthetics of Failure: ‘Post-Digital’ Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music. Computer Music Journal 24(4): 1218.

J. Chadabe 2000. Remarks on Computer Music Culture. Computer Music Journal 24(4): 911.

A. Collis 2008. Sounds of the System: The Emancipation of Noise in the Music of Carsten Nicolai. Organised Sound 13(1): 3139.

J. Demers 2010. Listening through the Noise: The Aesthetics of Experimental Electronic Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

P. Hegarty 2008. Just What is it that Makes Today’s Noise Music so Different, so Appealing? Organised Sound 13(1): 1320.

J. MacArthur 2005. The Nomenclature of Style: Brutalism, Minimalism, Art History and Visual Style in Architecture Journals. Architectural Theory Review 10(2): 100108.

B. Neill 2002. Pleasure Beats: Rhythm and the Aesthetics of Current Electronic Music. Leonardo Music Journal 12: 36.

T. Sangild 2004. Glitch – The Beauty of Malfunction. In C. Washburne and M. Derno (eds.) Bad Music: the Music We Love to Hate. New York: Routledge.

A. Smithson and P. Smithson 2011. The New Brutalism. October 136: 37 Reprinted from Architectural Design 27 (April 1957): 113.

A. Szepanski 2001. A Mille Plateaux Manifesto. Organised Sound 6(3): 225228.

P. Thomson 2004. Atoms and Errors: Towards a History and Aesthetics of Microsound. Organised Sound 9(2): 207218.

M. H. Zareei 2015a. Physical Glitch Music: A Brutalist Noise Ensemble. Leonardo Music Journal 25: 6367.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Organised Sound
  • ISSN: 1355-7718
  • EISSN: 1469-8153
  • URL: /core/journals/organised-sound
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Zareei supplementary material
Zareei supplementary material

 Unknown (74.3 MB)
74.3 MB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 111 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 481 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.