Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:17:43.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syntax as Sign: The use of ecological models within a semiotic approach to electroacoustic composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Adam Basanta
Adam Basanta*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, 1957 Venables St, Vancouver, BC, V5L 2H9, Canada
*
E-mail: aba36@sfu.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the possibilities afforded by the use of ecological models in electroacoustic compositions within a semiotic framework for composition. The ecological model is defined and distinguished as a signifier which is recognised through its syntax, and is examined in relation to theoretical writings in the field of electroacoustic composition, as well as approaches adapted from ecological psychology. Several approaches to ecological models – most significantly, those explored by Keller and Barrett – are surveyed while focusing on both technical and conceptual approaches. Finally, the author suggests new compositional possibilities and modes of engagement using ecological models, specifically through the lens of a semiotic framework and relating to the hybridisation of signs afforded by manipulation of computer models – illustrated through the author’s recent compositional work.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 15 , Issue 2: Organising electroacoustic music , August 2010 , pp. 125 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Barrett, N. 2000. Musical Structure, shifting perspectives and composition. CEC eContact 3.3. http://cec.concordia.ca/econtact/wea2/MusicalStructure.htm. Accessed on 28 November 2008.Google Scholar
Barrett, N. 2005. Adsonore. Organised Sound 10(2): 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Natasha. 2008a. Agora. http://www.natashabarrett.org/agora/engmore.html. Accessed on 24 November 2008.Google Scholar
Barrett, Natasha. 2008b. Three Fictions. http://www.natashabarrett.org/fictions.html. Accessed on 24 November 2008.Google Scholar
Cascone, K., Costello, S. M., Porcaro, N. J., Stilson, T. S., Van Duyne, S. A. 2001. Statistical Sound Event Modeling System and Methods. US Patent 7,310,604, 19 October 2001. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7310604.html. Accessed on 28 November 2008.Google Scholar
Keller, D. 1999. Touch’n’go: Ecological Models in Composition. MFA thesis, School of Contemporary Arts, Simon Fraser University. Available at http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~dkeller. HTML version available at http://www.sfu.ca/sonic-studio/srs/EcoModelsComposition/Title.html. Accessed on 24 November 2008.Google Scholar
Keller, D. 2000. Compositional Processes from an Ecological Perspective. Leonardo Music Journal 10: 55–60.Google Scholar
Landy, L. 2007. Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nattiez, J.-J. 1990. Music and Discourse: Towards a Semiology of Music, trans. C. Abbate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Neville, B. 2000. An Interview with Kim Cascone. http://www.cycling74.com/story/2005/9/13/163250/938. Accessed on 18 November 2008.Google Scholar
Pavis, P. 2004. Which Theories for Which Mise-en-Scènes? In J. Harding (ed.) Contours of the Theatrical Avant-garde: Performance and Textuality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rudy, P. 2007. Timbral Praxis: When a Tree Falls in the Forest is it Music? Organised Sound 12(1): 5–13.Google Scholar
Rudy, P. 2008. text/subtext/image and Sonitura. Lecture given at Orford Sound Creation workshop. Orford, Quebec.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1992. The Listening Imagination: Listening in the Electro-acoustic era. In J. Paynter, T. Howell, R. Orton and P. Seymour (eds.) Companion to Contemporary Musical Thought, Vol 1. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 2007. Space-form and the Acousmatic Image. Organised Sound 12(1): 35–58.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2001. Acoustic Communication. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2002. Genres and Techniques of Soundscape Composition as developed at Simon Fraser University. Organised Sound 7(1): 5–13.Google Scholar
Windsor, W. L. 1995. A Perceptual Approach to the Description and Analysis of Acousmatic Music. Doctoral thesis, City University, London. Available at http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~muswlw/pubs/lwthesis.html. Accessed on 23 August 2009.Google Scholar
Windsor, W. L. 2004. An Ecological Approach to Semiotics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34(2): 179–198.Google Scholar
Wishart, T. 1996. On Sonic Art. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1971. Formalized Music: Thought and Mathematics in Composition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Young, J. 1996. Imagining the Source: The Interplay of Realism and Abstraction in Electroacoustic Music. Contemporary Music Review 15(1–2): 73–93.Google Scholar
Young, J. 2004. Sound Morphology and the Articulation of Structure in Electroacoustic Music. Organised Sound 9(1): 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DISCOGRAPHY

Barrett, N. 2002. Three Fictions (Northern Mix): In the Rain (2000) and The Utility of Space (2000). On Isostasie. Montréal: Empreintes Digitales. IMED 0262.Google Scholar
Dolden, P. 1990. Below the Walls of Jericho (1988–89). On The Threshold of Deafening Silence. Toronto: Tronia. TRD 0190.Google Scholar
Keller, D. 1998. … soretes de punta (1998). On Harangue II. Vancouver: Earsayproductions, ES98005.Google Scholar
Keller, D. 1999. Touch’n’go/Tocoymevoy. Enhanced compact disc. Vancouver: Earsay productions, ES99002.Google Scholar
Koonce, P. 2000. Walkabout & Back. New York: Mode Records. MDE 90.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1993. Vortex (1982). On Tides. New Zealand: Ode Records. CD MANU 1433.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 2004. Valley Flow (1991–92). On Impacts intérieurs. Montréal: Empreintes Digitales. IMED 0409.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 1987. Riverrun (1986). On Digital Soundscapes. Vancouver: Cambridge Street Publishing, CSR-CD8701.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 1994. Basilica (1992). On Song of Songs. Vancouver: Cambridge Street Publishing, CSR-CD9401.Google Scholar
Wishart, T. 1990. Vox 5 (1986). On The Vox Cycle. London: Virgin Classics.Google Scholar
Wishart, T. 2000. Red Bird (1973–77). On Red Bird/Anticredos. Albany, NY: Electronic Music Foundation, EMF CD022.Google Scholar
Wishart, T. 2004. Imago (2002). On Etc. Albany, NY: Electronic Music Foundation, EMF CD053.Google Scholar
Young, J. 2002. Inner (1995). On La Limite Du Bruit. Montréal: Empreintes Digitales. IMED 0261.Google Scholar
Young, J. 2002. Liquid Rain (1998). On La Limite Du Bruit. Montréal: Empreintes Digitales. IMED 0261.Google Scholar

Basanta sound files

Sound example 1: Poisson distributed synthetic drops.

Download Basanta sound files(Audio)
Audio 3.9 MB

Basanta sound files

Sound example 2: Transformation of drops to dinner table.

Download Basanta sound files(Audio)
Audio 4.9 MB

Basanta sound files

Sound example 3: Transformation of breaking glass in to an underwater stream.

Download Basanta sound files(Audio)
Audio 7.5 MB

Basanta sound files

Sound example 4: Transformation of breaking glass in to birdsong.

Download Basanta sound files(Audio)
Audio 3.1 MB

Basanta sound files

Sound example 5: Adam Basanta, Free/Association – (full piece, of which Sound examples 1 to 4 are excerpts)

Download Basanta sound files(Audio)
Audio 101.7 MB