Skip to main content Accessibility help

Towards a Relational Understanding of the Performance Ecosystem

  • Tom Davis (a1)

This article seeks to form a deeper understanding of the performance ecosystem by drawing parallels with Bourriaud's Relational Aesthetics and Guattari's conception of subjectivity as outlined in Chaosmosis. Through an examination of participation within performance, and a recognition of the mutability of the roles of performer, listener, instrument and environment in the creation of the music event, this article examines the place of subjectivity, the capacity for self-creation, in the formation of a group aesthetic. Such a concept places the creation of meaning not within the individual participant but rather within the relationship between participants in a situation, a relationship that recognises the interaction between individuals, societies and institutions in its production. Such a discussion helps further our understanding of the performance ecosystem as a conceptual tool.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Barthes, R. 1977. Image Music Text. London: Fontana Press.
Bishop, C. 2004. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics. October 110: 5179.
Bishop, C. 2006. Participation. London: Whitechapel.
Bourriaud, N. 1998. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les presses du réel.
Bourriaud, N. 2001. Public Relations: Bennett Simpson Talks With Nicolas Bourriaud, Artforum (April 2001). Available at (accessed 20 April 2011).
Bowers, John. 2003. Improvising Machines: Ethnographically Informed Design for Improvised Electro-acoustic Music. Available at (accessed 27 October 2006).
Fried, M. 1967. Art and Objecthood. In C. Harrison and P. Wood (eds), Art in Theory, 1900–1990: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.
Guattari, F. 1995. Chaosmosis: An Ethico-aesthetic Paradigm, trans. P. Bains and J. Pefanis. Sydney: Power Publications.
Guattari, F. 1996. Subjectivities: For Better and for Worse. In G. Genosko (ed.), The Guattari Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 193203.
Impett, J. 2001. Interaction, Simulation and Invention: A Model for Interactive Music. In E. Bilotta, E.R. Miranda, P. Pantano and P.M. Todd (eds), Proceedings of ALMMA 2001 Workshop on Artificial Models for Musical Applications. Cosenza: Editoriale Bios, 108119.
Maturana, H., Varela, F. 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Netherlands: Reidel Publishing Company.
Moreno, A., Etxeverria, A. 2005. Agency in Natural and Artificial Systems. Artificial Life 11(1–2): 161176.
O'Sullivan, S. 2006. Academy: The Production of Subjectivity. In Irit Rogoff et al. (eds), Academy. Frankfurt: Revolver.
Ranciere, J. 2007. The Emancipated Spectator. Art Forum (March): 270281.
Small, C. 1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
Ungvary, T., Kieslinger, M. 1996. Towards a Musician's Cockpit. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Hong Kong.
Waters, Simon. 2007. Performance Ecosystems: Ecological Approaches to Musical Interaction’. Proceedings of the Electroacoustic Music Studies Network 2007.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Organised Sound
  • ISSN: 1355-7718
  • EISSN: 1469-8153
  • URL: /core/journals/organised-sound
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed