Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-vcb8f Total loading time: 0.271 Render date: 2022-10-04T11:25:42.956Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

The association between religiosity and resuscitation status preference among patients with advanced cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Marvin O. Delgado-Guay*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston , Texas
Gary Chisholm
Affiliation:
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston , Texas
Janet Williams
Affiliation:
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston , Texas
Eduardo Bruera
Affiliation:
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston , Texas
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Marvin Omar Delgado-Guay, Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, Unit 1414, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030-4009. E-Mail: marvin.delgado@mdanderson.org

Abstract

Objective:

The potential influence of patient religious and spiritual beliefs on the approach to end-of-life care and resuscitation status preferences is not well understood. The aim of this study was to assess the association between religiosity and resuscitation preferences in advanced-cancer patients.

Method:

We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial that evaluated the influence of physician communication style on patient resuscitation preferences. All patients completed the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire–Short Form (SCSRFQ–SF) and expressed their resuscitation preferences. We determined the frequency of resuscitation preferences and its association with intensity of religiosity.

Results:

A total of 78 patients completed the study. The median age was 54 years, with a range of 18–78. Some 46 (59%) were women; 57 patients (73%) were Caucasian, 15 (19%) African American, and 5 (7%) Hispanic. A total of 46 patients (56%) were Protestant and 13 (17%) Catholic. Some 53 of 60 patients who chose Do Not Resuscitate status (DNR) (88%) and 16 of 18 patients who refused DNR (89%) for a video-simulated patient were highly religious (p = 0.64). When asked about a DNR for themselves after watching the videos, 43 of 48 who refused DNR (90%) and 26 of 30 patients who chose DNR (87%) were highly religious (p = 0.08). The Spearman correlation coefficient for patients choosing DNR for themselves and intensity of religiosity was r = –0.16 (p = 0.16). Some 30 patients (38%) who chose DNR for the video patient refused DNR for themselves, and 42 who chose DNR for both the video patient and themselves (54%) were highly religious (p = NS).

Significance of Results:

There was no significant association between intensity of patient religiosity and DNR preference for either the video patient or the patients themselves. Other beliefs and demographic factors likely impact end-of-life discussions and resuscitation status preferences.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Astrow, A.B., Wexler, A., Texeira, K., et al. (2007). Is failure to meet spiritual needs associated with cancer patients' perceptions of quality of care and their satisfaction with care? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(36), 57535757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balboni, T., Vanderwerker, L., Block, S., et al. (2007). Religiousness and spiritual support among advanced-cancer patients and associations with end-of-life treatment preferences and quality of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25, 550560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balboni, T.A., Paulk, M.E., Balboni, M.J., et al. (2010). Provision of spiritual care to patients with advanced cancer: Associations with medical care and quality of life near death. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(3), 445452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, R.K. & Heller, K.S. (2002). Death and dying in the black experience. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 5, 793799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolling, J. (1995). Guinea across the water: The African-American approach to death and dying. In A cross-cultural look at death, dying, and religion. Perry, J.K. & Ryan, A.S. (eds.), pp. 145159. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Breitbart, W., Rosenfeld, B., Pessin, H., et al. (2000). Depression, hopelessness, and desire for death in terminally ill patients with cancer. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 29072911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruera, E., MacMillan, K., Hanson, J., et al. (1989). The Edmonton staging system for cancer pain: Preliminary report. Pain, 37, 203209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullock, K. (2006). Promoting advance directives among African Americans: A faith-based model. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 9(1), 183195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvajal, A., Centeno, C., Watson, R., et al. (2011). A comprehensive study of psychometric properties of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Spanish advanced cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 47, 18631872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, V.T., Hwang, S.S. & Feuerman, M. (2000). Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer, 88, 21642171.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chochinov, H. & Cann, B. (2005). Interventions to enhance the spiritual aspects of dying. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8, S103S115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgado-Guay, M.O., Hui, D., Parsons, H.A., et al. (2011). Spirituality, religiosity, and spiritual pain in advanced cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(6), 986994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, E., Murray, S., Kendall, M., et al. (2004). Spiritual issues and needs: Perspectives from patients with advanced cancer and nonmalignant disease. A qualitative study. Palliative & Supportive Care, 2, 371378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hills, J., Paice, J., Cameron, J., et al. (2005). Spirituality and distress in palliative care consultation. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8, 782788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinshaw, D. (2004). Spiritual issues at the end of life. Clinics in Family Practice, 6, 423440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, D., de la Cruz, M., Thorney, S., et al. (2011). The frequency and correlates of spiritual distress among patients with advanced cancer admitted to an acute palliative care unit. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care, 28, 264270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, L.M., Burns, K. & Bennett Jacobs, B. (2008). Trauma death: Views of the public and trauma professionals on death and dying from injuries. Archives of Surgery, 143(8), 730735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, K.S., Elbert-Avila, K.I. & Tulsky, J.A. (2005). The influence of spiritual beliefs and practices on the treatment preferences of African Americans: A review of the literature. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 711719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karches, K.E., Chung, G.S., Arora, V., et al. (2012). Religiosity, spirituality, and end-of-life planning: A single-site survey of medical inpatients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 44(6), 843851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Cancer Institute (2012). Spirituality in cancer care. Available from http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/supportivecare/spirituality/. Last accessed March 2014.Google Scholar
National Consensus Project (2013). The development of clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care. Available from http://www.nationalconsensusproject.org/. Last accessed March 2014.Google Scholar
Pargament, K.I., Koenig, H.G., Tarakeshwar, N., et al. (2004). Religious coping methods as predictors of psychological, physical and spiritual outcomes among medically ill elderly patients: A two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 713730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peteet, J.R. & Balboni, M.J. (2013). Spirituality and religion in oncology. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 63, 280289.Google Scholar
Plante, T. (2010). The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire: Assessing faith engagement in a brief and nondenominational manner. Religions, 1, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plante, T.G., & Boccaccini, M.T. (1997). The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 45, 375387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plante, T., Vallaeys, C., Sherman, A., et al. (2002). The development of a brief version of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 50, 359368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puchalski, C. (2004). Spirituality in health: The role of spirituality in critical care. Critical Care Clinics, 20, 487504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puchalski, C., Dorff, R. & Hendi, I. (2004). Spirituality, religion, and healing in palliative care. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 20, 689714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puchalski, C., Ferrel, B., Virani, R., et al. (2009). Improving the quality of spiritual care as a dimension of palliative care: The report of the consensus conference. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 10, 885904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhondali, W., Perez-Cruz, P., Hui, D., et al. (2013). Patient–physician communication about code status preferences: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer, 119(11), 20672073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, A., Simonton, S., Latif, U., et al. (2005). Religious struggle and religious comfort in response to illness: Health outcomes among stem cell transplant patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 359367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temel, J.S., Greer, J.A., Admane, S., et al. (2010). Code status documentation in the outpatient electronic medical records of patients with metastatic cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 150153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Truog, R.D. (2010). Is it always wrong to perform futile CPR? The New England Journal of Medicine, 362(6), 477479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The association between religiosity and resuscitation status preference among patients with advanced cancer
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The association between religiosity and resuscitation status preference among patients with advanced cancer
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The association between religiosity and resuscitation status preference among patients with advanced cancer
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *