Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-mqbnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-09-30T15:00:07.508Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Gender Equality in Academia: Bad News from the Trenches, and Some Possible Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2008

Kristen Monroe
University of California at Irvine
Saba Ozyurt
University of California at Irvine
Ted Wrigley
University of California at Irvine
Amy Alexander
University of California at Irvine


Is there gender discrimination in academia? Analysis of interviews with 80 female faculty at a large Research One university—the most comprehensive qualitative data set generated to date—suggests both individual and institutional discrimination persists. Overt discrimination has largely given way to less obvious but still deeply entrenched inequities. Despite apparent increases in women in positions of authority, discrimination continues to manifest itself through gender devaluation, a process whereby the status and power of an authoritative position is downplayed when that position is held by a woman, and through penalties for those agitating for political change. Female faculty find legal mechanisms and direct political action of limited utility, and increasingly turn to more subtle forms of incremental collective action, revealing an adaptive response to discrimination and a keen sense of the power dynamics within the university. Women attributed the persistence of gender inequality not to biology but to a professional environment in which university administrators care more about the appearance than the reality of gender equality and a professional culture based on a traditional, linear male model. Respondents described heart-wrenching choices between career and family responsibilities, with tensions especially intractable in the bench sciences. They advocated alternative models of professional life but also offered very specific interim suggestions for institutions genuinely interested in alleviating gender inequality and discrimination.

Research Article
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Acker, Sandra, and Armenti, Carmen. 2004. Sleepless in academia. Gender and Education 16 (1): 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aisenberg, Nadya, and Harrington, Mona. 1988. “A 2-tier Faculty System Reflects Old Social Rules That Restrict Women's Professional Development.” Chronicle of Higher Education 35(9): A56(1).Google Scholar
Babcock, Linda, and Laschever, Sara. 2003. Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bagihole, Barbara. 2002. Against the odds: Women academics' research opportunities. In Gender, Teaching and Research in Higher Education. Challenges for the 21st Century, ed. Howie, Gillian and Tauchert, Ashley. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Bell, Sandra, and Gordon, Jane. 1999. Scholarship—the new dimension to equity issues for academic women. Women's Studies International Forum 22 (6): 645–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2002. Last accessed June 20, 2007.Google Scholar
Friedan, Betty. 1963. The Feminine Mystique. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Ellen. 1995. “Gender Discrimination in the Workplace.” Last accessed June 20, 2007.Google Scholar
Koshland, Daniel E. Jr. 1988. Women in science. Science 239, 1473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luke, Carmen. 1999. Feminism in new times. In Everyday Knowledge and Uncommon Truths: Women of the Academy, ed. Christian-Smith, L. and Kellor, K.. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, Melanie, and DiGeorgio-Lutz, JoAnn. 1999. The Woman-Centered University: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
MIT Report. 1999. “A Study on the Status on Women Faculty in Science at MIT.” MIT Faculty Newsletter, vol. XI, no. 4.Google Scholar
Monroe, Kristen. 1996. The Heart of Altruism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Naff, Katherine. 1994. Through the glass ceiling: Prospects for the advancement of women in the Federal Civil Service. Public Administration Review 54 (6): 507–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2004. National Study of Postsecondary Faculty. Scholar
Oakes, Jeannie. 1990. Women and minorities in science and math. In Review of Research in Education, ed. Cazden, Courtney B.. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar