Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-2qt69 Total loading time: 0.284 Render date: 2022-08-15T22:31:57.522Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Paper Stones Revisited: Class Voting, Unionization and the Electoral Decline of the Mainstream Left

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2020

Abstract

Relying on post-election surveys, we analyze how class and union membership condition voters’ abandonment of mainstream Left parties and the alternatives chosen by former mainstream-Left voters in the period 2001–2015. Inspired by Przeworski and Sprague’s Paper Stones (1986), our analysis shows that Left parties face a trade-off between mobilizing workers and other voters and that unionization renders workers more loyal to Left parties that mobilize non-workers. By contrast, unionization does not render non-workers more loyal to Left parties that mobilize workers. Union membership increases the likelihood that workers who abandon the mainstream Left continue to vote. It also increases the likelihood that voters abandon the mainstream Left in favor of radical Left parties rather than Center-Right parties. Finally, we show that workers are more likely to abandon mainstream Left parties in favor of radical Right parties than non-workers and that union membership does not affect their propensity to do so. We conclude that reversing the decline of working-class organization should be a long-term objective of mainstream Left parties.

Type
Special Section: Working Class Blues or Reds?
Copyright
© American Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A list of permanent links to Supplemental Materials provided by the authors precedes the References section.

*

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YBPZRS

The research for and write-up of this paper have been supported by the European Research Council (Grant Agreement no. 741538). Jonas Pontusson also wishes to acknowledge the support of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017S1A3A2066657). Earlier versions of the paper were presented at the Annual Conference of the European Political Science Association (Milan, 2017), the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (San Francisco, 2017), the Norwegian Institute for Social Research (Oslo, 2018), the Swedish Institute for Social Research (Stockholm, 2018), the Institute of Political Science at the University of Bern (2018), the European University Institute (Fiesole, 2018), a workshop at the University of Geneva (2018), and the Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (2019). For insightful comments and other help, they thank John Ahlquist, Christoph Arndt, Paul Bauer, Michael Becher, Hans-Georg Betz, Björn Bremer, Reto Bürgisser, Henning Finseeras, McCartan Humphries, Konstantin Käppner, Daniel Oesch, Nadja Mosimann, Adam Przeworski, Magnus Rasmussen, and Reto Wüest.

References

Afonso, Alexandre and Rennwald, Line. 2018. “Social Class and the Changing Welfare State Agenda of Radical Right Parties in Europe.” In Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism, ed. Manow, Philipp, Schwander, Hanna and Palier, Bruno, 171194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Armingeon, Klaus, Isler, Christian, Knöpfel, Laura, Weisstanner, David and Engler, Sarah. 2018. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2016. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.Google Scholar
Arndt, Christoph and Rennwald, Line. 2016. “Union Members at the Polls in Diverse Trade Union Landscapes.” European Journal of Political Research 55(4): 702–22.10.1111/1475-6765.12157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzheimer, Kai. 2013. “Working-Class Parties 2.0? Competition between Centre-Left and Extreme Right Parties.” In Class Politics and the Radical Right, ed. Rydgren, Jens, 7590. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Becher, Michael and Pontusson, Jonas. 2011. “Whose Interests Do Unions Represent? Unionization by Income in Western Europe.” Research in the Sociology of Work 22(2): 181211.10.1108/S0277-2833(2011)000022B009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, Björn. 2019. Austerity from the Left: Explaining the Fiscal Policies of Social Democratic Parties in Response to the Great Recession. PhD dissertation, European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Michael J. 2016. “Competition and Solidarity: Union Members and Immigration in Europe.” West European Politics 39(4): 688709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey and De Graaf, Nan Dirk. 2013. “Explaining Cleavage Strength: The Role of Party Positions.” In Political Choice Matters. Explaining the Strength of Class and Religious Cleavages in Cross-National Perspective, ed. Evans, Geoffrey and De Graaf, Nan Dirk, 326. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199663996.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey and Mellon, Jon. 2016. “Working Class Votes and Conservative Losses: Solving the UKIP Puzzle.” Parliamentary Affairs 69(2): 464–79.10.1093/pa/gsv005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey and Tilley, James. 2017. The New Politics of Class: The Political Exclusion of the British Working Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755753.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael. N.d. “Election Indices.” Department of Political Science, Trinity College Dublin. Retrieved August 2019 (https://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/people/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/Docts/ElectionIndices.pdf).Google Scholar
Gingrich, Jane and Häusermann, Silja. 2015. “The Decline of the Working-Class Vote, the Reconfiguration of the Welfare Support Coalition and Consequences for the Welfare State.” Journal of European Social Policy 25(1): 5075.10.1177/0958928714556970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusermann, Silja and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2015. “What Do Voters Want? Dimensions and Configurations in Individual-Level Preferences and Party Choice.” In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, ed. Beramendi, Pablo, Häusermann, Silja, Kitschelt, Herbert and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 202230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316163245.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Alexander. 2018. “The Asymmetric Long-Term Consequences of Unpopular Reform.” Presented at the Annual International Conference of Europeanists, Chicago, March.Google Scholar
Kerrissey, Jasmine and Schofer, Evan. 2013. “Union Membership and Political Participation in the United States.” Social Forces 91(3): 895928.10.1093/sf/sos187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Rehm, Philipp. 2014. “Occupations as a Site of Political Preference Formation.” Comparative Political Studies 47(12): 1670–706.10.1177/0010414013516066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1998. “The Transformation of Cleavage Politics. The 1997 Stein Rokkan Lecture.” European Journal of Political Research 33(2): 165–85.10.1111/1475-6765.00379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosimann, Nadja and Pontusson, Jonas. 2017. “Solidaristic Unionism and Support for Redistribution in Contemporary Europe.” World Politics 69(3): 448–92.10.1017/S0043887117000107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosimann, Nadja and Pontusson, Jonas. 2018. “Heterogeneity of the Trade-Union Membership Effect on Support for Redistribution in Western Europe.” Unequal Democracies Working Paper no. 12. University of Geneva. (https://unequaldemocracies.unige.ch/files/5515/7848/9296/wp12.pdf).Google Scholar
Oesch, Daniel. 2006. Redrawing the Class Map. Stratification and Institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Oesch, Daniel. 2008. “Explaining Workers’ Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway and Switzerland.” International Political Science Review 29(3): 349–73.10.1177/0192512107088390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. 2013. “Unionization, Inequality and Redistribution.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 51(4): 797825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rathgeb, Philip. 2018. Strong Governments, Precarious Workers: Labour Market Policy-Making in the Era of Liberalisation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501730597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennwald, Line. 2015. Partis Socialistes et Classe Ouvrière. Ruptures et Continuités du Lien électoral en Suisse, en Autriche, en Allemagne, en Grande-Bretagne et en France (1970–2008). Neuchâtel: Editions Alphil-Presses universitaires suisses.10.33055/ALPHIL.03034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennwald, Line and Evans, Geoffrey. 2014. “When Supply Creates Demand: Social Democratic Party Strategies and the Evolution of Class Voting.” West European Politics 37(5): 1108–35.10.1080/01402382.2014.920981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Jake. 2014. What Unions No Longer Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674726215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. 1990. “Party Strategies and the Electoral Trade-Off of Class-Based Parties.” European Journal of Political Research 18(1): 2950.10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00220.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Catran, Alexander W. and Fairbrother., Malcolm 2016. “The Random Effects in Multilevel Models: Getting Them Wrong and Getting Them Right.” European Sociological Review 32(1): 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thau, Mads. 2017. “How Political Parties use Group-Based Appeals: Evidence from Britain 1945–2015.” Political Studies 61(1): 6382.Google Scholar
Tucker, Todd. 2018. Seven Strategies to Rebuild Worker Power for the 21st Century Global Economy: A Comparative and Historical Framework for Policy Action. New York: Roosevelt Institute.Google Scholar
Visser, Jelle. 2019. Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 55 Countries from 1960 to 2017. 1960–2014 (ICTWSS), Version 6.0. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies, University of Amsterdam (http://www.uva-aias.net/en/ictwss).Google Scholar
Volkens, Andrea, Krause, Werner, Lehmann, Pola, Matthieß, Theres, Merz, Nicolas, Regel, Sven and Weßels, Bernhard. 2019a. The Manifesto Data Collection: Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR), Version 2019a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum für Sozialforschung (https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/).Google Scholar
Volkens, Andrea, Krause, Werner, Lehmann, Pola, Matthieß, Theres, Merz, Nicolas, Regel, Sven and Weßels, Bernhard. 2019b. The Manifesto Project Dataset Codebook: Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR), Version 2019a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum für Sozialforschung (https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Rennwald and Pontusson supplementary material

Rennwald and Pontusson supplementary material

Download Rennwald and Pontusson supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1 MB
Supplementary material: Link

Rennwald and Pontusson Dataset

Link
5
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Paper Stones Revisited: Class Voting, Unionization and the Electoral Decline of the Mainstream Left
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Paper Stones Revisited: Class Voting, Unionization and the Electoral Decline of the Mainstream Left
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Paper Stones Revisited: Class Voting, Unionization and the Electoral Decline of the Mainstream Left
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *