Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Partners in Crime: An Empirical Evaluation of the CIA Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2018

Abstract

In the years following the attacks of 9/11, the CIA adopted a program involving the capture, extraordinary rendition, secret detention, and harsh interrogation of suspected terrorists in the war on terror. As the details of this program have become public, a heated debate has ensued, focusing narrowly on whether or not this program “worked” by disrupting terror plots and saving American lives. By embracing such a narrow view of the program’s efficacy, this debate has failed to take into account the broader consequences of the CIA program. We move beyond current debates by evaluating the impact of the CIA program on the human rights practices of other states. We show that collaboration in the CIA program is associated with a worsening in the human rights practices of authoritarian countries. This finding illustrates how states learn from and influence one another through covert security cooperation and the importance of democratic institutions in mitigating the adverse consequences of the CIA program. This finding also underscores why a broad perspective is critical when assessing the consequences of counterterrorism policies.


Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CC8VFT

A list of permanent links to Supplementary Materials provided by the authors precedes the References section.

The authors would like to thank Dara Cohen, Max Goplerud, Robert Keohane, Gary King, Leslie Vinjamuri, Kala Viswanathan, Steven Worthington, David Yanagizawa-Drott, Ista Zahn, and three anonymous reviewers, as well as participants in the conference on the Strategic Consequences of the U.S. Use of Torture at the Harvard Kennedy School and the annual meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, for their valuable feedback. They also thank Douglas Johnson, Alberto Mora, Nicole Deitelhoff, Lisbeth Zimmermann, Richard Price, and Henry Farrell for their contributions to the broader research project. Meg Kumar and Jessica Tueller provided excellent research assistance. Any and all errors are our own.


References

American Civil Liberties Union. 2017. “On Eve of Trial, Psychologists Agree to Historic Settlement in ACLU Case on Behalf of Three Torture Victims,” August 17. Available at https://www.aclu.org/news/cia-torture-psychologists-settle-lawsuit.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2000. Amnesty International Report 2000. New York, NY: Amnesty International Publications.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2006. “Incommunicado Detention/Fear of Torture or Ill-Treatment.” AI Index: AFR 27/005/2006, April 25.Google Scholar
Association of the Bar of the City of New York & Center for Human Rights and Global Justice. 2004. Torture by Proxy: International and Domestic Law Applicable to “Extraordinary Renditions.” New York: ABCNY and New York University School of Law.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. 2000. “Success and Failure in Foreign Policy.” Annual Review of Political Science 3:167-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond. 2005. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59(1): 3975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, Shannon L. 1999. “Instruments of Security or Tools of Repression? Arms Imports and Human Rights Conditions in Developing Countries.” Journal of Peace Research 36(2): 233–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, Shannon L. 2000. “Promoting Human Rights and Democracy in the Developing World: U.S. Rhetoric versus U.S. Arms Exports.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, Shannon L. 2005. “Foreign Policy in Transition? Human Rights, Democracy, and US Arms Exports.” International Studies Quarterly 49(4): 647–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce, Downs, George W., Smith, Alastair, and Feryal Marie Cherif. 2005. “Thinking Inside the Box: A Closer Look at Democracy and Human Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 49(3): 439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Investigative Journalism. 2017. “TRP-TBIJ CIA Prisoner Database.” Available at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1putZoc-DSftqXzZPOegNFX0cpDk3XJ2i3qEyI2JkgBI/edit#gid=135022344 .Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel L. 2006. “Friends Like These: Counterinsurgency and the War on Terrorism.” International Security 31(2): 79115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Austin. 2016. “Facing Off and Saving Face: Covert Intervention and Escalation Management in the Korean War.” International Organization 70(1): 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Barry E. 2008. International Economic Sanctions . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Seung-Whan and James, Patrick. 2016. “Why Does the United States Intervene Abroad: Democracy, Human Rights Violations, and Terrorism.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 60(5): 899926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L. and Pasquarello, Thomas E.. 1985. “Human Rights Practices and the Distribution of U.S. Foreign Aid to Latin American Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 29(3): 539–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L. and Richards., David L. 1999. “Measuring the Level, Pattern, and Sequence of Government Respect for Physical Integrity Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 43(2): 407–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L., Richards, David L., and Chad Clay, K.. 2014. “The CIRI Human Rights Dataset.” Dataset Version 2014.04.14. Available at http://www.humanrightsdata.com.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar. 2006. Report of the Events Relating to Maher Arar . Ottawa, ON: Minister of Public Works and Government Services.Google Scholar
Committee Against Torture. 2000. “Consideration of Reports Submitted By States Parties Under Article 19 of the Convention, Initial reports of States parties due in 1995, Addendum, United States of America.” February 9. Available at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/100296.pdf.Google Scholar
Committee Against Torture. 2006. “Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 19 of the Convention, Conclusions and recommendations of the Committee against Torture, United States of America.” 36th sess., May 1-19. Available at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/133838.pdf.Google Scholar
Corera, Gordon. 2016. “CIA Chief Warns Trump: Scrapping Iran Deal ‘Height of Folly’.” BBC, November 30.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2007. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian and Armstrong, David A.. 2004. “Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 538–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B.. 1977. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Association 39(1): 138.Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights. 2016. “Factsheet - Secret Detention Sites.” June. Available at http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Secret_detention_ENG.PDF.Google Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J. 2014. “Respect for Human Rights Has Improved over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability.” American Political Science Review 108(2): 297318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Anti-Torture Statute, 1994. 18 U.S. Code § 2340.Google Scholar
Frontline. 2007. “Extraordinary Rendition.” Public Broadcasting Service. November 4. Available at http://www.pbs.org/ frontlineworld/stories/rendition701/.Google Scholar
Gellman, Barton. 2008. Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency, New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Gibney, Mark, Cornett, Linda, Wood, Reed, Peter, Haschke, and Arnon, Daniel. 2016. “The Political Terror Scale 1976–2015.” Available at http://www.politicalterrorscale.org.Google Scholar
Gibson, Janice T. and Haritos-Fatouros, Mika. 1986. “The Education of a Torturer.” Psychology Today 20(11): 5058.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2005. “Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression.” International Organization 59(3): 593629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Daniel W. Jr. and Jones., Zachary M. 2014. “An Empirical Evaluation of Explanations for State Repression.” American Political Science Review 108(3): 661–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holley, Peter. 2016. “Former CIA Director: Military May Refuse to Follow Trump’s Orders If He Becomes President.” Washington Post, February 28.Google Scholar
Honaker, James and King, Gary. 2010. “What to Do about Missing Values in Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 561–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2008. “‘Why Am I Still Here?’ The 2007 Horn of Africa Renditions and the Fate of Those Still Missing.” Report. ISBN: 1-56432-380-3.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2012. “Delivered Into Enemy Hands: US-Led Abuse and Rendition of Opponents to Gaddafi’s Libya.” Report. ISBN: 1-56432-940-2.Google Scholar
International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance. 2006. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Available at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CED/Pages/ConventionCED.aspx.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2005. “Counter-Terrorism in Somalia: Losing Hearts and Minds?” Crisis Group Africa Report No. 95, July 11. Available at https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/horn-africa/somalia/counter-terrorism-somalia-losing-hearts-and-minds.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 2015. “The Torture Blame Game.” Foreign Affairs 94(3): 120–27.Google Scholar
Johnson, Douglas A., Mora, Alberto, and Schmidt., Averell 2016. “The Strategic Costs of Torture: How ‘Enhanced Interrogations’ Hurt America.” Foreign Affairs 95(5): 121–32.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jenna. 2016. “Trump Says ‘Torture Works,’ Backs Waterboarding and ‘Much Worse’.” Washington Post, February 17.Google Scholar
Kaempfer, William H. and Lowenberg, Anton D.. 1999. “Unilateral versus Multilateral International Sanctions: A Public Choice Perspective.” International Studies Quarterly 43(1): 3758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95(1): 4969.Google Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 2004. “Does Foreign Aid Promote Democracy?International Studies Quarterly 48(1): 251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1993. “Sovereignty, Regimes, and Human Rights.” In Regime Theory and International Relations , ed. Rittberger, Volker. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Lall, Ranjit. 2016. “How Multiple Imputation Makes a Difference.” Political Analysis 24(4): 414–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, ed. 2006. Torture: A Collection. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luban, David. 2005. “Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Bomb.” Virginia Law Review 91: 1425-61.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted Robert, and Jaggers, Keith. 2016. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2015.” Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace. Available at http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. and Sikkink., Kathryn 1993. “US Policy and Human Rights in Argentina and Guatemala.” In Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics , ed. Evans, Peter, Jacobson, Harold K., and Putnam, Robert D.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Jane. 2008. The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideal. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Mayerfeld, Jamie. 2016. The Promise of Human Rights: Constitutional Government, Democratic Legitimacy, and International Law . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meernik, James D., Poe, Steven, and Shaikh, Erum. 2006. “The Use of Military Force to Promote Human Rights.” In Conflict Prevention and Peace Building in Post-War Societies: Sustaining the Peace , ed. David Mason, T. and Meernik, James D.. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Michel, Werner E. 1992. “Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense: Improper Material in Spanish Language Intelligence Training Manuals.” March 10. Available at http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB122/920310%20Imporper%20Material%20in%20Spanish-Language%20Intelligence%20Training%20Manuals.pdf.Google Scholar
Murray, Mark J. 2011. “Extraordinary Rendition and U.S. Counterterrorism Policy.” Journal of Strategic Studies 4(3): 1528.Google Scholar
National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. 2016. “Global Terrorism Database.” Available at https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert. 2015. “Review by Robert Pape.” H-Diplo/ISSF Forum on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) Report and the United States’ Post-9/11 Policy on Torture, No. 5, 18-42. Available at http://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/ISSF-Forum-5.pdf.Google Scholar
Peksen, Dursun. 2009. “Better or Worse? The Effect of Economic Sanctions on Human Rights.” Journal of Peace Research 46(1): 5977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peksen, Dursun. 2012. “Does Foreign Military Intervention Help Human Rights?Political Research Quarterly 65(3): 558–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, Steven C. 2004. “The Decision to Repress: An Integrative Theoretical Approach to the Research on Human Rights and Repression.” In Understanding Human Rights Violations: New Systematic Studies , ed. Carey, Sabine C. and Poe, Steven C.. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Raphael, Sam, Black, Crofton, Blakeley, Ruth, and Kostas, Steve. 2016. “Tracking Rendition Aircraft as a Way to Understand CIA Secret Detention and Torture in Europe.” International Journal of Human Rights 20(1): 78103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M. 1995. “U.S. Economic Aid and Political Repression: An Empirical Evaluation of U.S. Foreign Policy.” Political Research Quarterly 48(3): 613–29.Google Scholar
Savage, Charlie. 2017. “Trump Poised to Lift Ban on C.I.A. ‘Black Site’ Prisons.” New York Times, January 25.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Sebastian. 2014. “Foreign Military Presence and the Changing Practices of Sovereignty.” American Political Science Review 108(4): 817–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. 2014. Report of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program together with Foreword by Chairman Feinstein and Additional Minority Views. 113th Cong., 2d sess., S. Report 113–288. Available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CRPT-113srpt288/pdf/CRPT-113srpt288.pdf.Google Scholar
Shear, Michael D., Davis, Julie Hirschfeld, and Haberman, Maggie. 2016. “Trump, in Interview, Moderates Views but Defies Conventions.” New York Times, November 22.Google Scholar
Sifton, John. 2010. “The Get Out of Jail Free Card for Torture: It’s Called a Declination, Just Ask the CIA.” Slate, March 29.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2004. Mixed Signals: U.S. Human Rights Policy and Latin America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2008. “The Role of Consequences, Comparison and Counterfactuals in Constructivist Ethical Thought.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, ed. Price, Richard M.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011 The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics . New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Singh, Amrit. 2013. Globalizing Torture: CIA Secret Detention and Extraordinary Rendition. New York: Open Society Justice Initiative.Google Scholar
Sislin, John. 1994. “Arms as Influence: The Determinants of Successful Influence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 38(4): 665–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subcommittee on International Organization of the Committee on International Relations of the United States House of Representatives. 1977. The Status of Human Rights in Selected Countries and the United States Response. 95th Cong., 1st sess. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Teorell, Jan, Dahlberg, Stefan, Holmberg, Sören, Rothstein, Bo, Khomenko, Anna, and Svensson, Richard. 2016. “The Quality of Government Standard Dataset.” Version January 2016. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. Available at http://www.qog.pol.gu.se.Google Scholar
The Rendition Project. 2017a. “Abu Zubaydah.” University of Kent. Available at http://www.therenditionproject.org.uk/prisoners/zubaydah.html.Google Scholar
The Rendition Project. 2017b. “Documents.” University of Kent. Available at https://www.therenditionproject.org.uk/documents/index.html.Google Scholar
The Rendition Project. 2017c. “Prisoners.” University of Kent. Available at http://www.therenditionproject.org.uk/prisoners/index.html .Google Scholar
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). 2017. “Country Summary Dataset.” Foreign Aid Explorer: The Official Record of U.S. Foreign Aid. Available at https://explorer.usaid.gov/prepared/us_foreign_aid_country.csv.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. 2017. “U.S. Trade in Goods by Country.” Available at https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/country.xlsx.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2001. “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices.” February 23. Available at https://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2000/af/665.htm.Google Scholar
U.S. Embassy Banjul. 2006. “The Gambia: DAS Thomas-Greenfield Discusses Human Rights Concerns.” Wikileaks. July 14. Available at https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06BANJUL444_a.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Embassy Damascus. 2007. “CODEL Specter Meets with Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem.” Wikileaks. December 31. Available at https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07DAMASCUS4_a.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Embassy Tashkent. 2007. “Uzbek Officials Show A Hint of Flexibility in Talks with Ambassador-At-Large Hanford.” Wikileaks. July 16. Available at https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07TASHKENT1300_a.html.Google Scholar
Valentine, Benjamin A. 2014. “Why We Kill: The Political Science of Political Violence against Civilians.” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 89103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, Lucan A. and Levitsky., Steven 2006. “The Dynamics of Autocratic Coercion after the Cold War.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39(3): 387410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. 1999. “Sanctions as a Foreign Policy Tool: Weighing Humanitarian Impulses.” Journal of Peace Research 36(5): 499509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlock, Craig. 2009. “Italian Court Convicts 23 Americans in CIA Rendition Case; Extradition Undecided.” Washington Post, November 4.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2008. “The Social Processes of Civil War: The Wartime Transformation of Social Networks.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 546–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2017. “Rape as a Practice of War: Towards a Typology of Political Violence.” Keynote address to the International Interventions against Sexual and Gender Based violence in Conflict workshop, University of Bremen, June 21-23.Google Scholar

Schmidt and Sikkink Dataset

Link

Schmidt and Sikkink supplementary material

Schmidt and Sikkink supplementary material 1

[Opens in a new window]
PDF 6 MB

Altmetric attention score


Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 97
Total number of PDF views: 563 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd November 2018 - 2nd December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-79f79cbf67-2p8r4 Total loading time: 0.353 Render date: 2020-12-02T23:02:47.547Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Wed Dec 02 2020 22:06:53 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Partners in Crime: An Empirical Evaluation of the CIA Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation Program
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Partners in Crime: An Empirical Evaluation of the CIA Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation Program
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Partners in Crime: An Empirical Evaluation of the CIA Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation Program
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *