Skip to main content

Between Science and Engineering: Reflections on the APSA Presidential Task Force on Political Science, Electoral Rules, and Democratic Governance: Why Ballot Structure Matters

  • Matthew S. Shugart (a1)

Political scientists have contributed to the world of electoral systems as scientists and as engineers. Taking stock of recent scientific research, we show that context modifies the effects of electoral rules on political outcomes in specific and systematic ways. We explore how electoral rules shape the inclusion of women and minorities, the depth and nature of political competition, and patterns of redistribution and regulation, and we consider institutional innovations that could promote political equality. Finally, we describe the diverse ways that political scientists produce an impact on the world by sharing and applying their knowledge of the consequences of electoral rules and global trends in reform.

Hide All
André Audrey, and Depauw Sam. 2012. “District Magnitude and Home Styles of Representation in European Democracies.” Presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Antwerp, April 11–15.
André Audrey, Depauw Sam, and Shugart Matthew S.. 2013. “The Effect of Electoral Institutions on Legislative Behavior.” In The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, ed. Martin by Shane, Saalfeld Thomas, and Strøm Kaare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bowler Shaun. 2002. “Parties in Legislature: Two Competing Explanations.” In Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. and R.J. Dalton, Wattenberg M.P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bowler S., and Farrell D. M.. 1993. Legislator Shirking and Voter Monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament Electoral Systems upon Legislative-Voter Relationships. Journal of Common Market Studies 31(1): 4569.
Cain Bruce E., Ferejohn John A., and Fiorina Morris P.. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carey John M. 2007. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 92107.
Carey John M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carey John M., and Shugart Matthew S.. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–39.
Crisp Brian F. 2007. “Incentives in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: General Election Laws, Candidate Selection Procedures, and Cameral Rules.” Comparative Political Studies 40(12): 1460–85.
Crisp Brian F., Escobar-Lemmon Maria C., Jones Bradford S., Jones Mark P., and Taylor-Robinson Michelle M.. 2004. “Electoral Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies.” The Journal of Politics 66(3): 823–46.
Curtice John, and Shively Phillips. 2009. “Who Represents Us Best? One Member or Many?” In The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, ed. Klingemann H.D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farrell D.M., and Scully R.. 2007. Representing Europe's Citizens? Electoral Institutions and the Failure of Parliamentary Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ingall Rachael E., and Crisp Brian F.. 2001. “Determinants of Home Style: The Many Incentives for Going Home in Colombia.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(3): 487511.
Mitchell Paul. 2000. “Voters and Their Representatives: Electoral Institutions and Delegation in Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 335–51.
Samuels David J. 2002. “Incentives to Cultivate a Party Vote in Candidate-Centric Electoral Systems: Evidence from Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 32(4): 487518.
Samuels David. J., and Shugart Matthew S.. 2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shugart Matthew S. 2005. “Comparative Electoral Systems Research: The Maturation of a Field and New Challenges Ahead.” In The Politics of Electoral Systems, ed. Gallagher Michael and Mitchell Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strøm K. 1997. “Rules, Reasons and Routines: Legislative Roles in Parliamentary Democracies.” In Members of Parliament in Western Europe: Roles and Behaviour, ed. Müller W.C. and Saalfeld T.. London: Frank Cass.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 30 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 108 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.