Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Between Science and Engineering: Reflections on the APSA Presidential Task Force on Political Science, Electoral Rules, and Democratic Governance: Why Ballot Structure Matters

  • Matthew S. Shugart (a1)
Abstract

Political scientists have contributed to the world of electoral systems as scientists and as engineers. Taking stock of recent scientific research, we show that context modifies the effects of electoral rules on political outcomes in specific and systematic ways. We explore how electoral rules shape the inclusion of women and minorities, the depth and nature of political competition, and patterns of redistribution and regulation, and we consider institutional innovations that could promote political equality. Finally, we describe the diverse ways that political scientists produce an impact on the world by sharing and applying their knowledge of the consequences of electoral rules and global trends in reform.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Shaun Bowler . 2002. “Parties in Legislature: Two Competing Explanations.” In Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. R.J. Dalton and , M.P. Wattenberg . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

S. Bowler , and D. M. Farrell . 1993. Legislator Shirking and Voter Monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament Electoral Systems upon Legislative-Voter Relationships. Journal of Common Market Studies 31(1): 4569.

Bruce E. Cain , John A. Ferejohn , and Morris P. Fiorina . 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

John M. Carey 2007. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 92107.

John M. Carey , and Matthew S. Shugart . 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–39.

Brian F. Crisp 2007. “Incentives in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: General Election Laws, Candidate Selection Procedures, and Cameral Rules.” Comparative Political Studies 40(12): 1460–85.

Brian F. Crisp , Maria C. Escobar-Lemmon , Bradford S. Jones , Mark P. Jones , and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson . 2004. “Electoral Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies.” The Journal of Politics 66(3): 823–46.

D.M. Farrell , and R. Scully . 2007. Representing Europe's Citizens? Electoral Institutions and the Failure of Parliamentary Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rachael E. Ingall , and Brian F. Crisp . 2001. “Determinants of Home Style: The Many Incentives for Going Home in Colombia.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(3): 487511.

Paul Mitchell . 2000. “Voters and Their Representatives: Electoral Institutions and Delegation in Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 335–51.

David J. Samuels 2002. “Incentives to Cultivate a Party Vote in Candidate-Centric Electoral Systems: Evidence from Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 32(4): 487518.

David. J. Samuels , and Matthew S. Shugart . 2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Matthew S. Shugart 2005. “Comparative Electoral Systems Research: The Maturation of a Field and New Challenges Ahead.” In The Politics of Electoral Systems, ed. Michael Gallagher and Paul Mitchell . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 22 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 85 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.