Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 13
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    ALLISON, MICHAEL E. 2016. Why Splinter? Parties that Split from the FSLN, FMLN and URNG. Journal of Latin American Studies, p. 1.


    Bogaards, Matthijs and Elischer, Sebastian 2016. Competitive authoritarianism in Africa revisited. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Vol. 10, Issue. S1, p. 5.


    Cheng, Edmund W. 2016. Street Politics in a Hybrid Regime: The Diffusion of Political Activism in Post-colonial Hong Kong. The China Quarterly, Vol. 226, p. 383.


    Cinar, Kursat 2016. A comparative analysis of clientelism in Greece, Spain, and Turkey: the rural–urban divide. Contemporary Politics, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 77.


    Liou, Yu-Ming and Musgrave, Paul 2016. Oil, Autocratic Survival, and the Gendered Resource Curse: When Inefficient Policy Is Politically Expedient. International Studies Quarterly, p. sqw021.


    Schedler, Andreas and Hoffmann, Bert 2016. Communicating authoritarian elite cohesion. Democratization, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 93.


    Brixi, Hana Lust, Ellen and Woolcock, Michael 2015. Trust, Voice, and Incentives: Learning from Local Success Stories in Service Delivery in the Middle East and North Africa.


    Fukuoka, Yuki 2015. Who brought down the dictator? A critical reassessment of so-called ‘People power’ revolutions in the Philippines and Indonesia. The Pacific Review, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 411.


    Goode, J. Paul and Stroup, David R. 2015. Everyday Nationalism: Constructivism for the Masses*. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 96, Issue. 3, p. 717.


    LeVan, A. Carl 2015. African State Governance.


    Pietsch, Juliet 2015. Authoritarian Durability: Public Opinion towards Democracy in Southeast Asia. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 31.


    Staniland, Paul 2015. Armed Groups and Militarized Elections. International Studies Quarterly, p. n/a.


    Weis, Toni 2014. Dominant parties and the private sector in Sub-Saharan Africa: a typology of approaches. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Vol. 8, Issue. 3-4, p. 263.


    ×

Beyond Patronage: Violent Struggle, Ruling Party Cohesion, and Authoritarian Durability

  • Steven R. Levitsky (a1) and Lucan A. Way (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592712002861
  • Published online: 19 December 2012
Abstract

We explore the sources of durability of party-based authoritarian regimes in the face of crisis. Recent scholarship on authoritarianism suggests that ruling parties enhance elite cohesion—and consequently, regime durability—by providing institutionalized access the spoils of power. We argue, by contrast, that while elite access to power and spoils may ensure elite cooperation during normal times, it often fails to do so during crises. Instead, the identities, norms, and organizational structures forged during periods of sustained, violent, and ideologically-driven conflict are a critical source of cohesion—and durability—in party-based authoritarian regimes. Origins in violent conflict raise the cost of defection and provide leaders with additional (non-material) resources that can be critical to maintaining unity and discipline, even when a crisis threatens the party's hold on power. Hence, where ruling parties combine mechanisms of patronage distribution with the strong identities, solidarity ties, and discipline generated by violent origins, regimes should be most durable.

We apply this argument to four party-based competitive authoritarian regimes in post-Cold War Africa: Kenya, Mozambique, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. In each of these cases, an established single- or dominant-party regime faced heightened international pressure, economic crisis, and a strong opposition challenge after 1990. Yet whereas ruling parties in Kenya and Zambia were organized almost exclusively around patronage, those in Mozambique and Zimbabwe were liberation parties that came to power via violent struggle. This difference is critical to explaining diverging post-Cold War regime outcomes: whereas ruling parties in Zambia and Kenya imploded and eventually lost power in these face of crises, those in Mozambique and Zimbabwe remained intact and regimes survived.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Chris Alden . 2001. Mozambique and the Construction of the New African State: From Negotiations to Nation Building. London: Palgrave.

David M. Anderson 2003. “Briefing: Kenya's Elections 2002—The Dawning of a New Era?African Affairs 102: 331–42.

Laia Balcells . 2012. “The Consequences of Victimization on Political Identities: Evidence from Spain.” Politics & Society 40(1): 311–47.

David Bartlett . 2000. “Civil Society and Democracy: a Zambian Case Study.” Journal of Southern African Studies 26(3): 429–46.

Gretchen Bauer . 2001. “Namibia in the First Decade of Independence: How Democratic?Journal of Southern African Studies 27(1): 3355.

Carolyn Baylies , and Morris Szeftel. 1992. “The Fall and Rise of Multi-Party Politics in Zambia.” Review of African Political Economy 19(54): 7591.

Mark R. Beissinger 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Michael Bratton , and Eldred Masunungure. 2006. “Popular Reactions to State Repression: Operation Murambatsvina in Zimbabwe.” African Affairs 106(422): 2145.

Michael Bratton , and Nicolas van de Walle. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stephen Brown . 2004. “Theorizing Kenya's Protracted Transition to Democracy.” Journal of Contemporary African Affairs 22(3): 325–42.

Jason Brownlee . 2007. Durable Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.

M. Steven Fish . 2005. Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jennifer Gandhi . 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Barbara Geddes . 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–44.

Barbara Geddes . 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research in Comparative Politics. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.

Kenneth Greene . 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Anna Grzymala-Busse . 2011. “Time Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes.” Comparative Political Studies 44(9): 1267–97.

Stephen E. Hanson 2010. Post-Imperial Democracies: Ideology and Party Formation in Third Republic France, Weimar Germany, and Post-Soviet Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Graham Harrison . 1996. “Democracy in Mozambique: The Significance of Multi-Party Elections.” Review of African Political Economy 23(67): 1935.

Marc Howard , and Philip G. Roessler. 2006. “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 207–25.

Stathis Kalyvas . 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Norma Kriger . 2003a. Guerrilla Veterans in Post-War Zimbabwe: Symbolic and Violent Politics, 1980–1987. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Norma Kriger . 2003b. “Zimbabwe's War Veterans and the Ruling Party: Continuities in Political Dynamics.” In Twenty Years of Independence in Zimbabwe: From Liberation to Authoritarianism, ed. Staffan Darnolf and Liisa Laakso. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.

Miles Larmer . 2008. “Enemies Within? Opposition to the Zambian One-Party State, 1972–1980.” In One Zambia, Many Histories: Towards a History of Post-colonial Zambia, ed. Jan-Bart Gewald, Marja Hinfelaar and Giacomo Macola. Leiden: Brill.

Adrienne LeBas . 2006. “Polarization as Craft: Party Formation and State Violence in Zimbabwe.” Comparative Politics 38(4): 419–38.

Adrienne LeBas . 2011. From Protest to Parties: Party-Building and Democratization in Africa. New York: Oxford University Press.

Steven Levitsky , and Lucan A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ellen Lust-Okar . 2006. “Elections under Authoritarianism: Preliminary Lessons from Jordan.” Democratization 13(3): 465–71.

Beatriz Magaloni . 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Beatriz Magaloni . 2008. “Credible Power Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 41(4-5): 715–41.

John Makumbe . 2002. “Zimbabwe's Hijacked Election.” Journal of Democracy 13(4): 87101.

Carrie L. Manning 2002a. “Elite Habituation to Democracy in Mozambique: The View from Parliament, 1994–2000.” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 40(1): 6180.

Michael McFaul . 2005. “Transitions from Postcommunism.” Journal of Democracy 16(3): 520.

Stephen N. Ndegwa 2003. “Kenya: Third Time Lucky?Journal of Democracy 14 (July): 145–58.

Anne Pitcher . 2002. Transforming Mozambique: The Politics of Privatization, 1975–2000. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brian Raftopoulos . 2002. “Briefing: Zimbabwe's 2002 Presidential Election.” African Affairs 101(2002): 413–26.

Brian Raftopoulos , and Daniel Compagnon. 2003. “Indigenization, the State Bourgeoisie and Neo-authoritarian Politics.” In Twenty Years of Independence in Zimbabwe: From Liberation to Authoritarianism, ed. Staffan Darnolf and Liisa Laakso. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.

Ora John Reuter , and Thomas F. Remington. 2009. “Dominant Party Regimes and the Commitment Problem: The Case of United Russia.” Comparative Political Studies 42(4): 501–26.

Richard Saunders . 2007. “Trade Union Struggles for Autonomy and Democracy in Zimbabwe.” In Trade Unions and the Coming of Democracy in Africa, ed. Jon Kraus. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Hans Peter Schmitz . 1999. “Transnational Activism and Political Change in Kenya and Uganda.” In The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, ed. Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Theda Skocpol . 1979. States and Social Revolutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dan Slater . 2009. “Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia.” American Journal of Sociology 115(1): 205–54.

Dan Slater . 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Milan Svolik . 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ronald Wintrobe . 1998. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×