Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Changing Mass Priorities: The Link between Modernization and Democracy

  • Ronald Inglehart (a1) and Christian Welzel (a2)

Abstract

A revised version of modernization theory implies that certain cultural variables (deeply-instilled attitudes among the public of a society) play an important role in democratization—and considerable empirical evidence supports this claim. Nevertheless, these variables are rarely used in econometric analysis of democratization. Why? One important reason is a tendency to view subjective mass orientations as volatile, relatively “soft” data. Analyzing data from many Large-N comparative survey projects, this article demonstrates that: (1) certain mass attitudes that are linked with modernization constitute attributes of given societies that are fully as stable as standard social indicators; (2) when treated as national-level variables, these attitudes seem to have predictive power comparable to that of widely-used social indicators in explaining important societal-level variables such as democracy; (3) national-level mean scores are a legitimate social indicator; and (4) one gets maximum analytic leverage by analyzing data from the full range of societies. We find numerous strong correlations between these subjective indicators and important societal attributes such as democracy, which suggest that causal linkages exist—but we do not attempt to demonstrate them here. Previous research has tested some of these linkages, finding support for causal interpretations, but conclusive tests of all the linkages shown here would require several book-length treatments. We briefly review some of the evidence supporting the conclusion that modernization leads to enduring mass attitudinal changes that are conducive to democracy.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2000. “Why Did the West Extend the Franchise? Growth, Inequality and Democracy in Historical Perspective.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(4): 1167–99.
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2001. “A Theory of Political Transitions.” American Economic Review 91(4): 938–63.
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barro, Robert J., and McCleary, Rachel M.. 2003. “Religion and Economic Growth across Countries.” American Sociological Review 68(5): 760781.
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Deutsch, Karl W. 1964. “Social Mobilization and Political Development.” American Political Science Review 55(3): 493514.
Haerpfer, Christian, Bernhagen, Patrick, Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian, eds. 2009. Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Baker, Wayne. 2000. Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review 65(1): 1951.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2009. “How Development Leads to Democracy: What We Know about Modernization.” Foreign Affairs March/April: 3348.
Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 69105.
Moore, Barrington Jr.. 1966. The Social Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.
Norris, Pippa. 2009. “The Globalization of Comparative Public Opinion Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics, eds. Landman, Todd and Robinson, Neil. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, Jose, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, James A. 2006. Economic Development and Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 9: 503527.
Robinson, William S. 1950. “Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals.” American Sociological Review 15(2): 351357.
Schwartz, Shalom H. 2003. “Mapping and Interpreting Cultural Differences around the World.” In Comparing Cultures, Dimensions of Culture in a Comparative Perspective, eds. Vinken, Henk, Soeters, Joseph, and Ester, Peter. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Schwartz, Shalom H. 2006. “A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications.” Comparative Sociology 5(2–3): 137182.
Seligson, Mitchell. 2002. “The Renaissance of Political Culture or the Renaissance of the Ecological Fallacy?Comparative Politics 34(3): 273–92.
Vanhanen, Tatu, ed. 1997. Prospects of Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries. New York: Routledge.
Welzel, Christian, Inglehart, Ronald, and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 2003. “The Theory of Human Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 42(2): 341380.
Welzel, Christian. 2007. “Are Levels of Democracy Influenced by Mass Attitudes?International Political Science Review 28(4): 397424.
Welzel, Christian, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2008. “Democratization as Human Empowerment.” Journal of Democracy 19(1): 126140.
Welzel, Christian, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2009. “Political Culture, Mass Beliefs and Value Change.” In Democratization, eds. Haerpfer, Christian et al. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zak, Paul J., and Knack, Stephen. 2001. “Trust and Growth.” The Economic Journal 111(2): 295321.
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Ingelhart and Welzel supplementary material
Explanatory File

 Word (70 KB)
70 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Ingelhart and Welzel supplementary material
Differences between the country scores-Figure 1

 Word (41 KB)
41 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed