Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Montgomery, Jacob M. Hollenbach, Florian M. and Ward, Michael D. 2015. Calibrating ensemble forecasting models with sparse data in the social sciences. International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 930.

    Yamamoto, Teppei 2012. Understanding the Past: Statistical Analysis of Causal Attribution. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 56, Issue. 1, p. 237.

    Hudson, Irene L. Moore, Linda Beh, Eric J. and Steel, David G. 2010. Ecological inference techniques: an empirical evaluation using data describing gender and voter turnout at New Zealand elections, 1893–1919. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 173, Issue. 1, p. 185.

    Alvarez, R. Michael Hall, Thad E. and Sinclair, Betsy 2008. Whose absentee votes are returned and counted: The variety and use of absentee ballots in California. Electoral Studies, Vol. 27, Issue. 4, p. 673.

    Dowding, K. 2005. Is it Rational to Vote? Five Types of Answer and a Suggestion. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 442.


Did Illegal Overseas Absentee Ballots Decide the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election?

  • Kosuke Imai (a1) and Gary King (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 September 2004

Although not widely known until much later, Al Gore received 202 more votes than George W. Bush on election day in Florida. George W. Bush is president because he overcame his election day deficit with overseas absentee ballots that arrived and were counted after election day. In the final official tally, Bush received 537 more votes than Gore. These numbers are taken from the official results released by the Florida Secretary of State's office and so do not reflect overvotes, undervotes, unsuccessful litigation, butterfly ballot problems, recounts that might have been allowed but were not, or any other hypothetical divergence between voter preferences and counted votes. After the election, the New York Times conducted a six-month investigation and found that 680 of the overseas absentee ballots were illegally counted, and almost no one has publicly disagreed with their assessment. In this article, we describe the statistical procedures we developed and implemented for the Times to ascertain whether disqualifying these 680 ballots would have changed the outcome of the election. These include adding formal Bayesian model averaging procedures to models of ecological inference. We present a variety of new empirical results that delineate the precise conditions under which Al Gore would have been elected president and offer new evidence of the striking effectiveness of the Republican effort to prevent local election officials from applying election law equally to all Florida citizens.The authors are deeply grateful to the many private citizens of every political stripe who sent us comments on this paper; also to Jim Alt, Barry Burden, James Honeker, Doug Rivers, and Jonathan Wand for helpful discussions; to Henry Brady for many suggestions; and to the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Aging, and the World Health Organization for research support. Software to implement the methods in this article is available at

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *