Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Diffusion-Proofing: Russian and Chinese Responses to Waves of Popular Mobilizations against Authoritarian Rulers

  • Karrie J. Koesel (a1) and Valerie J. Bunce (a2)

Do authoritarian leaders take preemptive actions to deter their citizens from joining cross-national waves of popular mobilizations against authoritarian rulers? Are they more likely to engage in such behavior when these uprisings appear to be more threatening—in particular, when they take place in neighboring countries and in regimes that resemble their own? We provide answers to these questions by comparing the responses of the Russian and Chinese leadership to two such waves: the color revolutions and the Arab uprisings. We conclude that, despite differences in the ostensible threats posed by these two waves, they nonetheless prompted the leaders of both of these countries to introduce similar preemptive measures in order to “diffusion-proof” their rule from the color revolutions and the Arab upheavals. These findings have some important implications for our understanding of authoritarian politics and diffusion processes. One is to reinforce the emphasis in many recent studies on the strategic foundations of authoritarian resilience. That recognized, however, we would add that the authoritarian toolkit needs to be expanded to include policies that preempt international, as well as domestic threats. The other is to provide further confirmation, in this case derived from the behavior of authoritarian rulers, of how scholars have understood the drivers of cross-national diffusion. At the same time, however, we counsel students of diffusion to pay more attention to the role of resisters, as well as to adopters. In this sense, the geographical reach of diffusion is much broader than many analysts have recognized.

Hide All
Thomas Ambrosio . 2007. “Insulating Russia from a Colour Revolution: How the Kremlin Resists Regional Democratic Trends.” Democratization 14(2): 232–52.

Mark Beissinger . 2007. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer, Rose, Orange and Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5(2): 259–76.

Daniel Brinks , and Michael Coppedge . 2006. “Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 39(4): 463–89.

Jason Brownlee . 2012. Democracy Prevention: The Politics of the U.S.–Egyptian Alliance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bruce Bueno de Mesquita , and George W. Downs . 2005. “Development and Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 84(5): 7786.

Valerie Bunce . 1999. Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Valerie Bunce , and Sharon Wolchik . 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dennis Chong , and James N. Druckman . 2013. “Counterframing Effects.” Journal of Politics 75: 116.

Evgeny Finkel , and Yitzhak M. Brudny . 2012a. “No More Colour! Authoritarian Regimes and Colour Revolutions in Eurasia.” Democratization 19(1): 114.

Evgeny Finkel , and Yitzhak M. Brudny . 2012b. “Russia and the Colour Revolutions.” Democratization 19(1): 1536.

Jennifer Gandhi . 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40(11): 1279–301.

Jennifer Gandhi , and Adam Przeworski . 2006. “Cooperation, Cooptation, and Rebellion under Dictatorships.” Economics & Politics 18(1): 126.

Rebecca Kotlins Givan , Sarah A. Soule , and Kenneth Roberts , eds. 2010. The Diffusion of Social Movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Karrie Koesel , and Valerie Bunce . 2012. “Putin, Popular Protests and Political Trajectories in Russia: A Comparative Perspective.” Post-Soviet Affairs 28(4): 403–23.

Steven Levitsky , and Lucan A. Way . 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rebecca MacKinnon . 2008. “Flatter World and Thicker Walls? Blogs, Censorship and Civic Discourse in China.” Public Choice 134(1-2): 3146.

Beatriz Magaloni . 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Eric McGlinchey . 2009. “Searching for Kamalot: Political Patronage and Youth Politics in Uzbekistan.” Europe-Asia Studies 61(7): 1137–50.

Kevin ed O'Brien . 2008. Popular Protest in China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Stefanie Ortmann . 2008. “Diffusion as Discourse of Danger: Russian Self-Representations and the Framing of the Tulip Revolution.” Central Asian Survey 27(3-4): 363–78.

Pitman B. Potter , and Sophia Woodman . 2012. “Boundaries of Tolerance: Charter 08 and Debates Over Political Reform.” In Liu Xiaobo, Charter 08, and the Challenges of Political Reform in China, ed. Jean-Philippe Beja , Huanling Fu , and Eva Pils . Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

James T. Quinlivan 1999. “Coup-proofing: Its Practice and Consequences in the Middle East.” International Security 24(2): 131–65.

Scott Radnitz . 2012. “Oil in the Family: Managing Presidential Succession in Azerbaijan.” Democratization 19(1): 6077.

Graeme Robertson . 2013. “Protesting Putinism: The Election Protests of 2011–2012 in Broader Perspective.” Problems of Postcommunism 60(2): 1123.

M.E. Sarotte 2012. “China's Fear of Contagion: Tiananmen Square and the Power of the European Example.” International Security 37(2): 156–82.

Beth A. Simmons , Frank Dobbin , and Geoffrey Garrett , eds. 2008. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Daniel Stockman , and Mary Gallagher . 2011. “Remote Control: How the Media sustain Authoritarian Rule in China.” Comparative Political Studies 44(4): 436–67.

Milan W. Svolik 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Guillermo Trejo . 2012. Popular Movements in Autocracies: Religion, Repression, and Indigenous Collective Action in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ronald Wintrobe . 2001. “How to Understand and Deal with Dictatorship: An Economists' View.” Economics of Governance 2: 3558.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 357 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 861 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.