Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Talk “Like a Man”: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013

Abstract

Hillary Clinton is arguably the most prominent woman in American politics today. Past research suggests female politicians conform to masculine communication styles in an attempt to evade the “double bind.” Clinton’s long and varied career thus provides an important and useful case study for investigating how female politicians present themselves strategically. Drawing on research in political psychology, political communication, social psychology, and linguistics I examine whether Clinton talked “like a man” as she navigated a path toward political leadership by conducting a quantitative textual analysis of 567 interview transcripts and candidate debates between 1992–2013. Results on Clinton’s linguistic style suggest her language grew increasingly masculine over time, as her involvement and power in politics expanded. I also consider Clinton’s language in the context of her 2007–2008 presidential campaign. In 2007, Clinton’s linguistic style was consistently masculine, supporting widespread accounts of Clinton’s campaign strategy. Beginning in late 2007, however, Clinton’s language became more feminine, reflecting a shift in the self-presentational strategies advised by her campaign staff. Throughout the 2008 campaign period, Clinton’s language fluctuated dramatically from one interview to the next, reflecting a candidate—and campaign—in crisis. This study reveals hidden insight into the strategies Clinton used as she navigated through the labyrinth toward leadership. Changes in Clinton’s linguistic style reflect the performance of gendered roles, expectations of political leaders, and the masculine norms of behavior that permeate political institutions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Talk “Like a Man”: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Talk “Like a Man”: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Talk “Like a Man”: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Shlomo Argamon , Moshe Koppel , James Pennebaker , and Jonathan Schler . 2007. “Mining the Blogosphere: Age, Gender and the Varieties of Self-Expression.” First Monday 12(9).

Mary C. Banwart and Mitchell S. McKinney . 2005. “A Gendered Influence in Campaign Debates? Analysis of Mixed-gender United States Senate and Gubernatorial Debates.” Communication Studies 56(4): 353–73.

Deborah Cameron . 2005. “Language, Gender, and Sexuality: Current Issues and New Directions.” Applied Linguistics 26(4): 482502.

Karlyn Kohrs Campbell . 1998. “The Discursive Performance of Femininity: Hating Hillary.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 1(1): 120.

Diana B. Carlin and Kelly L. Winfrey . 2009. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage.” Communication Studies 60(4): 326–43.

Deborah L Dodson . 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Paul S. Herrnson , J. Celeste Lay , and Atiya Kai Stokes . 2003. “Women Running “as Women”: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter Targeting Strategies.” Journal of Politics 65(1): 244–55.

Mala Htun . 2004. “Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups.” Perspectives on Politics 2(3): 439–58.

Shanto Iyengar , Gaurav Sood , and Yphtach Lelkes . 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology a Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 405–31.

Christopher F. Karpowitz and Tali Mendelberg . 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Donald R. Kinder , Mark D. Peters , Robert P. Abelson , and Susan T. Fiske . 1980. “Presidential Prototypes.” Political Behavior 2(4): 315337.

Donald R. Kinder and David O. Sears . 1981. “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism Versus Racial Threats to the Good Life.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(3): 414.

David C. King and Richard E. Matland . 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31(6): 595612.

Jennifer L. Lawless and Richard L. Fox . 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Will Lowe , Kenneth Benoit , Slava Mikhaylov , and Michael Laver . 2011. “Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(1): 123–55.

Timothy R. Lynch and Kathleen Dolan . 2014. “Voter Attitudes, Behaviors, and Women Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Sue Thomas , and Clyde Wilcox . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jane Mansbridge . 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes.” Journal of Politics 61(3): 628–57.

Anthony Mulac , James J. Bradac , and Pamela Gibbons . 2001. “Empirical Support for the Gender as Culture Hypothesis.” Human Communication Research 27(1): 121–52.

Matthew L. Newman , Carla J. Groom , Lori D. Handelman , and James W. Pennebaker . 2008. “Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples.” Discourse Processes 45(3): 211–36.

Kathryn Pearson and Logan Dancey . 2011a. “Elevating Women’s Voices in Congress Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64(4): 910–23.

James W. Pennebaker , Matthias R. Mehl , and Kate G. Niederhoffer . 2003. “Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves.” Annual Review of Psychology 54(1): 547–77.

Oliver C Schultheiss . 2013. “Are Implicit Motives Revealed in Mere Words? Testing the Marker-Word Hypothesis with Computer-Based Text Analysis.” Frontiers in Psychology 4(748).

Andrew Schwartz , Johannes C. Eichstaedt , Margaret L. Kern , Lukasz Dziurzynski , Stephanie M. Ramones , Megha Agrawal , Achal Shah , Michal Kosinski , David Stillwell , and Martin E. P. Seligman . 2013. “Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach.” PLoS ONE 8(9).

David O. Sears and Carolyn L. Funk . 1999. “Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults’ Political Predispositions.” Journal of Politics 61(1): 128.

Sylvia Shaw . 2000. “Language, Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates.” Discourse & Society 11(3): 401–18.

Richard B. Slatcher , Cindy K. Chung , James W. Pennebaker , and Lori D. Stone . 2007. “Winning Words: Individual Differences in Linguistic Style among U.S. Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates.” Journal of Research in Personality 41(1): 6375.

Yla R. Tausczik and James W. Pennebaker . 2010. “The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(1): 2454.

Michael Tesler . 2014. “Priming Predispositions and Changing Policy Positions: An Account of When Mass Opinion Is Primed or Changed.” American Journal of Political Science 59(4): 806–24.

Michael Tesler and David O. Sears . 2010. Obama’s Race: The 2008 Election and the Dream of a Post-Racial America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Philip E Tetlock . 1984. “Cognitive Style and Political Belief Systems in the British House of Commons.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(2): 365.

Nicholas J. G Winter . 2008. Dangerous Frames: How Ideas About Race and Gender Shape Public Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Nicholas J. G Winter . 2010. “Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties.” Political Behavior 32(4): 587618.

Bei Yu . 2014. “Language and Gender in Congressional Speech.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 29(1): 118–32.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 5

 Unknown (114.4 MB)
114.4 MB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 6

 Unknown (15 KB)
15 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 3

 Unknown (26 KB)
26 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 4

 Unknown (224 KB)
224 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 1

 Word (96 KB)
96 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 2

 Word (131 KB)
131 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1095
Total number of PDF views: 3628 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 6142 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.