Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Talk “Like a Man”: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013

  • Jennifer J. Jones
Abstract

Hillary Clinton is arguably the most prominent woman in American politics today. Past research suggests female politicians conform to masculine communication styles in an attempt to evade the “double bind.” Clinton’s long and varied career thus provides an important and useful case study for investigating how female politicians present themselves strategically. Drawing on research in political psychology, political communication, social psychology, and linguistics I examine whether Clinton talked “like a man” as she navigated a path toward political leadership by conducting a quantitative textual analysis of 567 interview transcripts and candidate debates between 1992–2013. Results on Clinton’s linguistic style suggest her language grew increasingly masculine over time, as her involvement and power in politics expanded. I also consider Clinton’s language in the context of her 2007–2008 presidential campaign. In 2007, Clinton’s linguistic style was consistently masculine, supporting widespread accounts of Clinton’s campaign strategy. Beginning in late 2007, however, Clinton’s language became more feminine, reflecting a shift in the self-presentational strategies advised by her campaign staff. Throughout the 2008 campaign period, Clinton’s language fluctuated dramatically from one interview to the next, reflecting a candidate—and campaign—in crisis. This study reveals hidden insight into the strategies Clinton used as she navigated through the labyrinth toward leadership. Changes in Clinton’s linguistic style reflect the performance of gendered roles, expectations of political leaders, and the masculine norms of behavior that permeate political institutions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Talk “Like a Man”: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Talk “Like a Man”: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Talk “Like a Man”: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Argamon, Shlomo, Koppel, Moshe, Fine, Jonathan, and Shimoni, Anat Rachel. 2003. “Gender, Genre, and Writing Style in Formal Written Texts.” Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 23(3): 321–46.
Argamon, Shlomo, Koppel, Moshe, Pennebaker, James, and Schler, Jonathan. 2007. “Mining the Blogosphere: Age, Gender and the Varieties of Self-Expression.” First Monday 12(9).
Banwart, Mary C. and McKinney, Mitchell S.. 2005. “A Gendered Influence in Campaign Debates? Analysis of Mixed-gender United States Senate and Gubernatorial Debates.” Communication Studies 56(4): 353–73.
Beckwith, Karen and Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly. 2007. “Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women’s Political Representation.” Perspectives on Politics 5(3): 553–65.
Brooks, Deborah J. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Burns, Lisa M. 2009. “Press Framing of First Ladies’ Political Activism.” In Gender and Political Communication in America: Rhetoric, Representation, and Display, ed. Edwards, Janis L.. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Burrell, Barbara C. 2001. Public Opinion, the First Ladyship, and Hillary Rodham Clinton. New York: Routledge.
Burros, Marion. 1995. “Hillary Clinton Asks Help in Finding a Softer Image.” New York Times, January 10.
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble. 2d ed. London: Routledge.
Butler, Judith. 2013. “Your Behavior Creates Your Gender.” Big Think Video. Posted Oct. 13, http://bigthink.com/videos/your-behavior-creates-your-gender, accessed September 2015.
Bystrom, Dianne G., Robertson, Terry, Banwart, Mary Christine, and Kaid, Lynda Lee. 2004. Gender and Candidate Communication: Videostyle, Webstyle, Newstyle. New York: Routledge.
Cameron, Deborah. 2005. “Language, Gender, and Sexuality: Current Issues and New Directions.” Applied Linguistics 26(4): 482502.
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1998. “The Discursive Performance of Femininity: Hating Hillary.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 1(1): 120.
Carlin, Diana B. and Winfrey, Kelly L.. 2009. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage.” Communication Studies 60(4): 326–43.
Carroll, Susan J. 2009. “Reflections on Gender and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign: The Good, the Bad, and the Misogynic.” Politics & Gender 5(1): 120.
Center for American Women in Politics. 2015. “Women in Elective Office 2015.” Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/women-elective-office-2015, accessed April 2015.
Clinton, Hillary. 1992a. “Governor and Mrs. Bill Clinton Discuss Adultery Accusations” Interview by Steve Kroft. 60 Minutes. CBS. January 26.
Clinton, Hillary. 1992b. “Making Hillary an Issue.” Interview by Ted Koppel. Nightline, PBS. March 26.
Department of State. “Former Secretary Clinton’s Remarks. [Interviews only].” http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/index.htm, accessed October 2014.
Department of State. “Former Secretary Clinton’s Town Halls and Townterviews [Interviews, Town Halls and Townterviews only].” http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/townhalls/index.htm, accessed October 2014.
Dodson, Deborah L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dowd, Maureen. 2008. “Can Hillary Cry Her Way Back to the White House?” New York Times, January 9.
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia and Kelly, Rita Mae, eds. 1995. Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Eagly, Alice H. and Carli, Linda L.. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
Edwards, Janis L. 2009. “Politics as a Gendered Space.” In Gender and Political Communication in America: Rhetoric, Representation, and Display, ed. Edwards, Janis L.. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
FLOTUS Press Office Interview Transcripts. First Lady’s Office, Press Office. Lissa Muscatine Collection. Clinton Digital Library, http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/collections/show/15, accessed September 2014.
Gertzog, Irwin N. (1995). Congressional Women: Their Recruitment, Integration, and Behavior. 2d ed. New York: Praeger.
Grimmer, Justin. 2010. “A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts: Measuring Expressed Agendas in Senate Press Releases.” Political Analysis 18(1): 135.
Haste, Helen. 1993. The Sexual Metaphor. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 529–50.
Herrnson, Paul S., Celeste Lay, J., and Stokes, Atiya Kai. 2003. “Women Running “as Women”: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter Targeting Strategies.” Journal of Politics 65(1): 244–55.
Htun, Mala. 2004. “Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups.” Perspectives on Politics 2(3): 439–58.
Huddy, Leonie and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37119–47.
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology a Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 405–31.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1995. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jones, Jeffrey M. 2015. “Clinton Favorability, Familiarity Bests 2016 Contenders.” Gallup, March 12. www.gallup.com/poll/181949/clinton-favorability-familiarity-bests-2016-contenders.aspx, accessed April 2, 2015.
Karpowitz, Christopher F. and Mendelberg, Tali. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 560–76.
Kellerman, Barbara and Rhode, Deborah L.. 2007. “Women and Leadership: The State of Play.” In Women and Leadership: The State of Play and Strategies for Change, ed. Rhode, Deborah L., and Kellerman, Barbara. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Imprint.
Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D., Abelson, Robert P., and Fiske, Susan T.. 1980. “Presidential Prototypes.” Political Behavior 2(4): 315337.
Kinder, Donald R. and Sears, David O.. 1981. “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism Versus Racial Threats to the Good Life.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(3): 414.
King, David C. and Matland, Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31(6): 595612.
Kornblut, Anne E. 2011. Notes from the Cracked Ceiling. New York: Broadway Books.
Krum, Sharon. 2008. “Why Women Really Should Rule.” The Guardian, March 26. http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/mar/26/women.gender, accessed October 2015.
Lawless, Jennifer L. and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence, Regina G. and Rose, Melody. 2010. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lowe, Will, Benoit, Kenneth, Mikhaylov, Slava, and Laver, Michael. 2011. “Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(1): 123–55.
Lynch, Timothy R. and Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. “Voter Attitudes, Behaviors, and Women Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Thomas, Sue, and Wilcox, Clyde. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manning, Jennifer E. and Brudnick, Ida A.. 2014. Women in the United States Congress, 1917–2014: Biographical and Committee Assignment Information, and Listings by State and Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes.” Journal of Politics 61(3): 628–57.
Martin, Jonathan. 2015. “For a Clinton, It’s Not Hard to be Humble to Regain Power.” New York Times, April 16.
McKinney, Mitchell S., Davis, Corey B., and Delbert, Jeffrey. 2009. “The First and Last Woman Standing: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Presidential Primary Debate Performance.” In Cracked But Not Shattered: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Unsuccessful Campaign for the Presidency, ed. Sheckels, Theodore F.. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
McThomas, Mary and Tesler, Michael. 2016. “The Growing Influence of Gender Attitudes on Public Support for Hillary Clinton, 2008–2012.” Politics & Gender 12(1): 2849.
Mulac, Anthony, Bradac, James J., and Gibbons, Pamela. 2001. “Empirical Support for the Gender as Culture Hypothesis.” Human Communication Research 27(1): 121–52.
Newman, Matthew L., Groom, Carla J., Handelman, Lori D., and Pennebaker, James W.. 2008. “Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples.” Discourse Processes 45(3): 211–36.
Pearson, Kathryn and Dancey, Logan. 2011a. “Elevating Women’s Voices in Congress Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64(4): 910–23.
Pearson, Kathryn and Dancey, Logan. 2011b. “Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women’s Interests in a Partisan Era.” Politics & Gender 7(4): 493519.
Pennebaker, James W. 2011. The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say about Us. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Pennebaker, James W., Booth, Roger J., and Francis, Martha E.. 2007. “Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007): A Text Analysis Program [Computer Software].” Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
Pennebaker, James W., Mehl, Matthias R., and Niederhoffer, Kate G.. 2003. “Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves.” Annual Review of Psychology 54(1): 547–77.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2007. “Voter Impressions of Leading Candidates: Clinton Seen as ‘Tough’ and ‘Smart’—Giuliani as ‘Energetic.’” September 20. www.people-press.org/2007/09/20/clinton-seen-as-tough-and-smart-giuliani-as-energetic/, accessed April 12, 2015.
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind. New York: HarperCollins.
Schultheiss, Oliver C. 2013. “Are Implicit Motives Revealed in Mere Words? Testing the Marker-Word Hypothesis with Computer-Based Text Analysis.” Frontiers in Psychology 4(748).
Schwartz, Andrew, Eichstaedt, Johannes C., Kern, Margaret L., Dziurzynski, Lukasz, Ramones, Stephanie M., Agrawal, Megha, Shah, Achal, Kosinski, Michal, Stillwell, David, and Seligman, Martin E. P.. 2013. “Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach.” PLoS ONE 8(9).
Sears, David O. and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1999. “Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults’ Political Predispositions.” Journal of Politics 61(1): 128.
Shaw, Sylvia. 2000. “Language, Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates.” Discourse & Society 11(3): 401–18.
Slatcher, Richard B., Chung, Cindy K., Pennebaker, James W., and Stone, Lori D.. 2007. “Winning Words: Individual Differences in Linguistic Style among U.S. Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates.” Journal of Research in Personality 41(1): 6375.
Spiker, Julia A. 2009. “It Takes a Village to Win: A Rhetorical Analysis of ‘Hillary for President’.” In Cracked But Not Shattered: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Unsuccessful Campaign for the Presidency, ed. Sheckels, Theodore F.. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tajfel, Henri and Turner, John C.. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 33(47): 74.
Tausczik, Yla R. and Pennebaker, James W.. 2010. “The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(1): 2454.
Tesler, Michael. 2014. “Priming Predispositions and Changing Policy Positions: An Account of When Mass Opinion Is Primed or Changed.” American Journal of Political Science 59(4): 806–24.
Tesler, Michael and Sears, David O.. 2010. Obama’s Race: The 2008 Election and the Dream of a Post-Racial America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tetlock, Philip E. 1984. “Cognitive Style and Political Belief Systems in the British House of Commons.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(2): 365.
Turner, John C., Hogg, Michael A., Oakes, Penelope J., Reicher, Stephen D., and Wetherell, Margaret S.. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Perspective. New York: Blackwell.
Watson, Robert P. 1999. The Presidents’ Wives: Reassessing the Office of First Lady. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Winter, Nicholas J. G. 2008. Dangerous Frames: How Ideas About Race and Gender Shape Public Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Winter, Nicholas J. G. 2010. “Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties.” Political Behavior 32(4): 587618.
Woolley, John and Gerhard, Peters. 2014. The American Presidency Project. University of California. Available from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/debates.php.
Yu, Bei. 2014. “Language and Gender in Congressional Speech.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 29(1): 118–32.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 5

 Unknown (114.4 MB)
114.4 MB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 6

 Unknown (15 KB)
15 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 3

 Unknown (26 KB)
26 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 4

 Unknown (224 KB)
224 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 1

 Word (96 KB)
96 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Jones supplementary material
Jones supplementary material 2

 Word (131 KB)
131 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1258
Total number of PDF views: 4219 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 7306 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.