Little, Andrew T. 2015. Fraud and Monitoring in Non-competitive Elections. Political Science Research and Methods, Vol. 3, Issue. 01, p. 21.
Celestino, Mauricio Rivera and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede 2013. Fresh carnations or all thorn, no rose? Nonviolent campaigns and transitions in autocracies. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 50, Issue. 3, p. 385.
Stykow, Petra 2010. „Bunte Revolutionen“ – Durchbruch zur Demokratie oder Modus der autoritären Systemreproduktion?. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Vol. 51, Issue. 1, p. 137.
Goode, J. Paul 2016. Eyes Wide Shut: Democratic Reversals, Scientific Closure, and the Study of Politics in Eurasia*. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 97, Issue. 4, p. 876.
Onuch, Olga 2015. EuroMaidan Protests in Ukraine: Social Media Versus Social Networks. Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 62, Issue. 4, p. 217.
Kuzio, Taras 2012. Democratic Revolutions from a Different Angle: Social Populism and National Identity in Ukraine's 2004 Orange Revolution. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 41.
Fearon, J. D. 2011. Self-Enforcing Democracy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 126, Issue. 4, p. 1661.
MALESKY, EDMUND and SCHULER, PAUL 2011. The Single-Party Dictator's Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 36, Issue. 4, p. 491.
Saikkonen, Inga A.-L. 2016. Variation in subnational electoral authoritarianism: evidence from the Russian Federation. Democratization, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 437.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. Hyde, Susan D. and Jablonski, Ryan S. 2014. When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence?. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, Issue. 01, p. 149.
Tanaka, Seiki 2016. Retirement planning for dictators: what happens to outgoing dictators?. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 1.
RUNDLETT, ASHLEA and SVOLIK, MILAN W. 2016. Deliver the Vote! Micromotives and Macrobehavior in Electoral Fraud. American Political Science Review, Vol. 110, Issue. 01, p. 180.
Gel'man, Vladimir 2015. Political Opposition in Russia: A Troubled Transformation. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 67, Issue. 2, p. 177.
Brancati, Dawn 2014. Pocketbook Protests. Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 47, Issue. 11, p. 1503.
Brancati, Dawn 2014. Building Confidence in Elections: The Case of Electoral Monitors in Kosova. Journal of Experimental Political Science, Vol. 1, Issue. 01, p. 6.
Levin, Ines Sinclair, J. Andrew and Alvarez, R. Michael 2016. Participation in the Wake of Adversity: Blame Attribution and Policy-Oriented Evaluations. Political Behavior, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 203.
Sundström, Aksel and Stockemer, Daniel 2015. Regional variation in voter turnout in Europe: The impact of corruption perceptions. Electoral Studies, Vol. 40, p. 158.
Jackson, Nicole J. 2010. The role of external factors in advancing non-liberal democratic forms of political rule: a case study of Russia's influence on Central Asian regimes. Contemporary Politics, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 101.
Duvanova, Dinissa Semenov, Alexander and Nikolaev, Alexander 2015. Do social networks bridge political divides? The analysis of VKontakte social network communication in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 224.
Sjoberg, Fredrik M. 2016. Bring the party back in: Institutional design for ‘smart election fraud’. Electoral Studies, Vol. 44, p. 307.
Stockemer, Daniel and Calca, Patricia 2013. Corruption and turnout in Portugal—a municipal level study. Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 60, Issue. 5, p. 535.
Earle, John S. and Gehlbach, Scott 2015. The Productivity Consequences of Political Turnover: Firm-Level Evidence from Ukraine's Orange Revolution. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 708.
Koesel, Karrie J. and Bunce, Valerie J. 2012. Putin, Popular Protests, and Political Trajectories in Russia: A Comparative Perspective. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 403.
Ishiyama, John and Pechenina, Anna 2016. Colored Revolutions, Interpersonal Trust, and Confidence in Institutions: The Consequences of Mass Uprisings*. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 97, Issue. 3, p. 748.
Brown, David S. Brown, J. Christopher and Donaghy, Maureen M. 2011. The Electoral Consequences of Direct Political Action: Evidence from Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 53, Issue. 4, p. 35.
Landolt, Laura K. and Kubicek, Paul 2014. Opportunities and constraints: comparing Tunisia and Egypt to the coloured revolutions. Democratization, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 984.
Kolstad, Ivar and Wiig, Arne 2016. Does democracy reduce corruption?. Democratization, Vol. 23, Issue. 7, p. 1198.
Hale, Henry E. 2013. Regime Change Cascades: What We Have Learned from the 1848 Revolutions to the 2011 Arab Uprisings. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 331.
Rozenas, Arturas 2017. Detecting Election Fraud from Irregularities in Vote-Share Distributions. Political Analysis, Vol. 25, Issue. 01, p. 41.
Nepstad, Sharon Erickson 2013. Mutiny and nonviolence in the Arab Spring. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 50, Issue. 3, p. 337.
Kelley, Judith G. 2012. International Influences on Elections in New Multiparty States. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 203.
BEISSINGER, MARK R. 2013. The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine's Orange Revolution. American Political Science Review, Vol. 107, Issue. 03, p. 574.
Bekoe, Dorina A. 2017. The United Nations Operation in Côte d’Ivoire: How a Certified Election Still Turned Violent. International Peacekeeping, p. 1.
Stockemer, Daniel 2013. Corruption and Turnout in Presidential Elections: A Macro-Level Quantitative Analysis. Politics & Policy, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 189.
McAllister, Ian and White, Stephen 2011. Public Perceptions of Electoral Fairness in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 63, Issue. 4, p. 663.
BIRCH, SARAH and VAN HAM, CAROLIEN 2017. Getting away with foul play? The importance of formal and informal oversight institutions for electoral integrity. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 56, Issue. 3, p. 487.
Semenov, Andrey Lobanova, Olesya and Zavadskaya, Margarita 2016. When do political parties join protests? A comparative analysis of party involvement in “for fair elections” movement. East European Politics, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 81.
Magaloni, Beatriz and Kricheli, Ruth 2010. Political Order and One-Party Rule. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 123.
Lasnier, Virginie 2017. Russia’s Opposition Movement Five Years After Bolotnaia. Problems of Post-Communism, p. 1.
Hyde, Susan D. and Marinov, Nikolay 2014. Information and Self-Enforcing Democracy: The Role of International Election Observation. International Organization, Vol. 68, Issue. 02, p. 329.
Tansey, Oisín 2016. The Limits of the “Democratic Coup” Thesis: International Politics and Post-Coup Authoritarianism: Table 1.. Journal of Global Security Studies, Vol. 1, Issue. 3, p. 220.
Teorell, Jan and Wahman, Michael 2017. Institutional stepping stones for democracy: how and why multipartyism enhances democratic change. Democratization, p. 1.
White, Stephen and McAllister, Ian 2014. Did Russia (Nearly) have a Facebook Revolution in 2011? Social Media's Challenge to Authoritarianism. Politics, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 72.
Gandhi, Jennifer and Lust-Okar, Ellen 2009. Elections Under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 403.
Raik, Kristi and Dinesen, Ruxandra Lupu 2015. The European Union and Upheavals in its Neighborhood: A Force for Stability?. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 38, Issue. 12, p. 902.
Fumagalli, Matteo and Turmanidze, Koba 2017. Taking partly free voters seriously: autocratic response to voter preferences in Armenia and Georgia. Caucasus Survey, p. 1.
Miller, Michael K. 2012. Economic Development, Violent Leader Removal, and Democratization. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 56, Issue. 4, p. 1002.
Simmons, Erica 2014. Grievances do matter in mobilization. Theory and Society, Vol. 43, Issue. 5, p. 513.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. Hyde, Susan D. and Jablonski, Ryan S. 2016. Surviving Elections: Election Violence, Incumbent Victory and Post-Election Repercussions. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.
Goode, J. Paul 2010. Redefining Russia: Hybrid Regimes, Fieldwork, and Russian Politics. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 8, Issue. 04, p. 1055.
Simpser, Alberto and Donno, Daniela 2012. Can International Election Monitoring Harm Governance?. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 74, Issue. 2, p. 501.
Edgell, Amanda B. Mechkova, Valeriya Altman, David Bernhard, Michael and Lindberg, Staffan I. 2017. When and where do elections matter? A global test of the democratization by elections hypothesis, 1900–2010. Democratization, p. 1.
Onuch, Olga and Sasse, Gwendolyn 2016. The Maidan in Movement: Diversity and the Cycles of Protest. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 68, Issue. 4, p. 556.
Daxecker, Ursula E 2012. The cost of exposing cheating. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 49, Issue. 4, p. 503.
Ó Beacháin, Donnacha and Kevlihan, Rob 2015. Imagined democracy? Nation-building and elections in Central Asia. Nationalities Papers, Vol. 43, Issue. 3, p. 495.
Hyde, Susan D. 2007. The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. World Politics, Vol. 60, Issue. 01, p. 37.
Stewart, Susan 2009. Democracy promotion before and after the ‘colour revolutions’. Democratization, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 645.
Miller, Michael K 2013. Electoral authoritarianism and democracy: A formal model of regime transitions. Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 153.
Pacek, Alexander C. Pop-Eleches, Grigore and Tucker, Joshua A. 2009. Disenchanted or Discerning: Voter Turnout in Post-Communist Countries. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 71, Issue. 2, p. 473.
Sjoberg, Fredrik M. 2014. Autocratic adaptation: The strategic use of transparency and the persistence of election fraud. Electoral Studies, Vol. 33, p. 233.
Reuter, Ora John and Szakonyi, David 2015. Online Social Media and Political Awareness in Authoritarian Regimes. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 45, Issue. 01, p. 29.
Brancati, Dawn 2014. Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 313.
Shirah, Ryan 2016. Electoral authoritarianism and political unrest. International Political Science Review, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 470.
Yap, O. Fiona 2017. WHEN DO CITIZENS TAKE COSTLY ACTION AGAINST GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION? EVIDENCE FROM EXPERIMENTS IN AUSTRALIA, SINGAPORE, AND THE UNITED STATES. Journal of East Asian Studies, Vol. 17, Issue. 01, p. 119.
Svolik, Milan W. 2013. Learning to Love Democracy: Electoral Accountability and the Success of Democracy. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 57, Issue. 3, p. 685.
Lankina, Tomila 2015. The Dynamics of Regional and National Contentious Politics in Russia: Evidence from a New Dataset. Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 62, Issue. 1, p. 26.
Smyth, Regina Sobolev, Anton and Soboleva, Irina 2013. A Well-Organized Play. Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 24.
Knutsen, Carl Henrik Nygård, Håvard Mokleiv and Wig, Tore 2017. Autocratic Elections. World Politics, Vol. 69, Issue. 01, p. 98.
Trejo, Guillermo 2014. The Ballot and the Street: An Electoral Theory of Social Protest in Autocracies. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 12, Issue. 02, p. 332.
Balmaceda, Margarita M. 2013. Privatization and elite defection in de facto states: The case of Transnistria, 1991–2012. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 46, Issue. 4, p. 445.
Pleines, Heiko Rose, Lawrence E. Conrad, Burkhard Debus, Tessa Hofmann, Wilhelm Fein, Elke Botsch, Gideon Haftendorn, Helga Brusis, Martin Ganghof, Steffen Thies, Björn Heindl, Markus Shikano, Susumu Toens, Katrin and Kleinschmidt, Jochen 2008. PVS-Literatur. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Vol. 49, Issue. 2, p. 361.
Lankina, Tomila and Skovoroda, Rodion 2017. Regional protest and electoral fraud: evidence from analysis of new data on Russian protest. East European Politics, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 253.
Ruijgrok, Kris 2016. From the web to the streets: internet and protests under authoritarian regimes. Democratization, p. 1.
Meirowitz, Adam and Tucker, Joshua A. 2013. People Power or a One-Shot Deal? A Dynamic Model of Protest. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, p. 478.
Marinov, Nikolay and Goemans, Hein 2014. Coups and Democracy. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, Issue. 04, p. 799.
ROSENFELD, BRYN 2017. Reevaluating the Middle-Class Protest Paradigm: A Case-Control Study of Democratic Protest Coalitions in Russia. American Political Science Review, p. 1.
Benton, Allyson Lucinda 2016. Configuring authority over electoral manipulation in electoral authoritarian regimes: evidence from Mexico. Democratization, p. 1.
Ash, Konstantin 2011. A game-theoretic model for protest in the context of post-communism. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 1.
Barceló, Joan 2017. National Personality Traits and Regime Type. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 195.
Tanneberg, Dag Stefes, Christoph and Merkel, Wolfgang 2013. Hard times and regime failure: autocratic responses to economic downturns. Contemporary Politics, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 115.
Daxecker, Ursula E. 2014. All quiet on election day? International election observation and incentives for pre-election violence in African elections. Electoral Studies, Vol. 34, p. 232.
Cummings, Sally N. and Ryabkov, Maxim 2008. Situating the ‘Tulip Revolution’. Central Asian Survey, Vol. 27, Issue. 3-4, p. 241.
Hauser, Megan 2017. Does Electoral Manipulation Vary?. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review,
Wong, Stan Hok-Wui 2017. Gerrymandering in Electoral Autocracies: Evidence from Hong Kong. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.
Stockemer, Daniel 2016. Is the Turnout Function in Democracies and Nondemocracies Alike or Different?. Politics & Policy, Vol. 44, Issue. 5, p. 889.
Driscoll, Jesse and Hidalgo, F Daniel 2014. Intended and unintended consequences of democracy promotion assistance to Georgia after the Rose Revolution. Research & Politics, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 205316801453027.
Smidt, Hannah 2016. From a perpetrator’s perspective. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 53, Issue. 2, p. 226.
Kalandadze, Katya and Orenstein, Mitchell A. 2009. Electoral Protests and Democratization Beyond the Color Revolutions. Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 42, Issue. 11, p. 1403.
Tanaka, Seiki 2017. Aging gracefully? Why old autocrats hold competitive elections. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, p. 205789111772812.
Bhasin, Tavishi and Gandhi, Jennifer 2013. Timing and targeting of state repression in authoritarian elections. Electoral Studies, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 620.
Baev, Pavel K. 2011. A Matrix for Post-Soviet ‘Color Revolutions’: Exorcising the Devil from the Details. International Area Studies Review, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 3.
EPPERLY, BRAD 2017. Political competition and de facto judicial independence in non-democracies. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 56, Issue. 2, p. 279.
In countries where citizens have strong grievances against the regime,
attempts to address these grievances in the course of daily life are
likely to entail high costs coupled with very low chances of success in
any meaningful sense; consequently, most citizens will choose not to
challenge the regime, thus reflecting the now well-known collective action
problem. When a regime commits electoral fraud, however, an
individual's calculus regarding whether to participate in a protest
against the regime can be changed significantly. This argument yields
important implications for how we interpret the wave of “colored
revolutions” that swept through Serbia, Georgia, Ukraine, and
Kyrgyzstan in the first half of this decade. Applying the collective
action framework to the colored revolutions also yields a parsimonious
contribution to the political science literature on social protest:
electoral fraud can be a remarkably useful tool for solving the collective
action problems faced by citizens in countries where governments are not,
to use Barry Weingast's language, appropriately restrained by the
populace. While modest, such an observation actually can speak to a
wide-ranging number of questions in the literature, including why people
choose to protest when they do, how protests at one place and time can
affect the likelihood for future protests, and new aspects of the
relationship between elections and protest.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.