Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T12:21:50.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Openness to Inclusion: Toward a Democratic Approach to Migration Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2024

Nathan Pippenger Open the ORCID record for Nathan Pippenger [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many theorists argue that justice in international migration requires states to maximize the openness of their borders, even when that can only be done by denying full political membership to some migrants. In contrast, this article contends that democratic ideals recommend inclusion as the guiding principle of migration policy, since full membership for all the state’s residents is the only way to preserve democratic self-rule, whereas the justice- and freedom-related goals associated with openness can be promoted via other means. I define full inclusion as involving not only formal rights, but also solidarity. Against accounts that define solidarity in terms of shared identity (i.e., a specific commonality), I argue that democratic solidarity requires intersubjective “identification” among members of the demos, oriented toward their shared future. This account suggests how migration policy might advance the practical goal of more open borders, along with other moral goals associated with calls for greater openness, without sacrificing important democratic ideals.

Type
Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , First View , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abizadeh, Arash. 2007. “Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope (Not Site) of Distributive Justice.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (4): 318–58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00116.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth S. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109 (2): 287–337. DOI: 10.1086/233897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth S. 2009. “Democracy: Instrumental vs. Non-Instrumental Value.” In Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy, eds. Christiano, Thomas and Christman, John, 213–27. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444310399.ch12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angell, Kim, and Huseby, Robert. 2017. “Should Irregular Immigrants Be (Rapidly) Enfranchised?” Political Research Quarterly 70 (2): 363–73. DOI: 10.1177/1065912917695188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer. 2005. “Expansive Citizenship—Voting beyond Territory and Membership.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (4): 683–87. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096505050341.Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer. 2007. “Stakeholder Citizenship and Transnational Political Participation: A Normative Evaluation of External Voting.” Fordham Law Review 75 (5): 2393–2448.Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer. 2009. “Global Justice, Freedom of Movement and Democratic Citizenship.” European Journal of Sociology 50 (1): 1–31. DOI: 10.1017/S000397560900040X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer. 2011. “Temporary Migrants, Partial Citizenship and Hypermigration.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5): 665–93. DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2011.617127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer. 2022. “Temporary Migrants’ Claims to Democratic Inclusion: A Review Essay on Valeria Ottonelli and Tiziana Torresi’s The Right Not to Stay.” Law, Ethics and Philosophy 9: 156–69. DOI: 10.31009/LEAP.2022.V9.10.Google Scholar
Beckman, Ludvig. 2013. “Irregular Migration and Democracy: The Case for Inclusion.” Citizenship Studies 17 (1): 48–60. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2012.669964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Ludvig, and Rosenberg, Jonas Hultin. 2018. “Freedom as Non-Domination and Democratic Inclusion.” Res Publica 24 (2): 181–98. DOI: 10.1007/s11158-016-9348-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel A., and Piper, Nicola. 2005. “Justice for Migrant Workers? The Case of Foreign Domestic Workers in Hong Kong and Singapore.” In Multiculturalism in Asia, eds. Kymlicka, Will and He, Baogang, 196–222. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199277621.003.0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Meghan. 2014. “The Problem of Denizenship: A Non-Domination Framework.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1): 49–69. DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2013.851479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, Christopher. 2019. “The Openness–Rights Trade-Off in Labour Migration, Claims to Membership, and Justice.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (2): 283–96. DOI: 10.1007/s10677-018-9968-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, Christopher. 2022. “Democracy and the Representation of the Interests of Temporary Migrant Workers.” Law, Ethics and Philosophy 9: 170–79. DOI: 10.31009/LEAP.2022.V9.11.Google Scholar
Blajer de la Garza, Yuna. 2023. “Conceptualizing Belonging for Democratic Theory.” The Journal of Politics 85 (4): 1457–70. DOI: 10.1086/723980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, Gillian. 2020. Justice for People on the Move: Migration in Challenging Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108774581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, Joseph H. 1987. “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders.” The Review of Politics 49 (2): 251–73. DOI: 10.1017/s0034670500033817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, Joseph H. 2013. The Ethics of Immigration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Howard F. 2011. “The Immigration Paradox: Alien Workers and Distributive Justice.” In Citizenship, Borders, and Human Needs, ed. Smith, Rogers M., 92–114. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI: 10.9783/9780812204667.92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Adam B. 2017. “Three Mistakes in Open Borders Debates.” Nomos 57: 51–68.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
de Haas, Hein. 2012. “The Migration and Development Pendulum: A Critical View on Research and Policy.” International Migration 50 (3): 8–25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2012.00755.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, Helder, and Ypi, Lea. 2015. “The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay: Mandatory Citizenship for Immigrants.” British Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 235–51. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123414000568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. (1927) 2016. The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry, ed. Rogers, Melvin L.. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Andrew, and Hadj-Abdou, Leila. 2016. “An Unstable Equilibrium: Freedom of Movement and the Welfare State in the European Union.” In Handbook on Migration and Social Policy, eds. Freeman, Gary P. and Mirilovic, Nikola, 222–38. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781783476299.00022.Google Scholar
Glick Schiller, Nina. 2003. “The Centrality of Ethnography in the Study of Transnational Migration: Seeing the Wetland Instead of the Swamp.” In American Arrivals: Anthropology Engages the New Immigration, ed. Foner, Nancy, 99–128. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/257/monograph/chapter/857648.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 2003. Reflective Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199256179.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Peter W. 2013. Immigration Justice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748670260.001.0001.Google Scholar
Hovdal-Moan, Marit. 2014. “Unequal Residence Statuses and the Ideal of Non-Domination.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1): 70–89. DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2013.851483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Migration Data Analysis Centre. 2023. “Migration and Human Mobility: Key Global Figures.” Migration Data Portal, November 6. Berlin: Global Migration Data Analysis Centre, International Organization for Migration. https://www.migrationdataportal.org/sites/g/files/tmzbdl251/files/2023-11/EN%20November%20update%20%281%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 2009. “Transnational Cycles of Gendered Vulnerability: A Prologue to a Theory of Global Gender Justice.” Philosophical Topics 37 (2): 33–52. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics20093723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, Michael. 2000. “Transnational Oaxacan Indigenous Identity: The Case of Mixtecs and Zapotecs.” Identities 7 (2): 173–95. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2000.9962664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukathas, Chandran. 2011. “Expatriatism: The Theory and Practice of Open Borders.” In Citizenship, Borders, and Human Needs, ed. Smith, Rogers M., 324–42. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI: 10.9783/9780812204667.324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukathas, Chandran. 2021. Immigration and Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv16rdcgw.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2015. “Solidarity in Diverse Societies: Beyond Neoliberal Multiculturalism and Welfare Chauvinism.” Comparative Migration Studies 3: 1–19. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-015-0017-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jacob T. 2017. “Against Fraternity: Democracy without Solidarity.” In The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, eds. Banting, Keith and Kymlicka, Will, 107–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795452.003.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Guerra, Claudio. 2005. “Should Expatriates Vote?” Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (2): 216–34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, Rut Rubio. 1998. “National Limits to Democratic Citizenship.” Ratio Juris 11 (1): 51–66. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9337.00076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. 2014. “Immigration: The Case for Limits.” In Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics, 2nd edition, eds. Cohen, Andrew I. and Wellman, Christopher H., 363–75. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2016. Strangers in Our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/9780674969827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Margaret. 2009. “Is Patriotism an Associative Duty?” The Journal of Ethics 13 (4): 383–99. DOI: 10.1007/s10892-009-9064-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motomura, Hiroshi. 2006. Americans in Waiting: The Lost Story of Immigration and Citizenship in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ochoa Espejo, Paulina. 2016. “Taking Place Seriously: Territorial Presence and the Rights of Immigrants.” Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (1): 67–87. DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orosco, José-Antonio. 2016. Toppling the Melting Pot: Immigration and Multiculturalism in American Pragmatism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt2005wtt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottonelli, Valeria, and Torresi, Tiziana. 2022. The Right Not to Stay: Justice in Migration, the Liberal Democratic State, and the Case of Temporary Migration Projects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192866776.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, David. 2011. “Transnational Citizenship and the Democratic State: Modes of Membership and Voting Rights.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5): 641–63. DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2011.617123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, Fabienne. 2007. “Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 6 (3): 329–53. DOI: 10.1177/1470594X07081303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippenger, Nathan. 2021. “The Shadows of the Past and the Work of the Future: Frederick Douglass’s Temporal Theory of Democracy.” The Review of Politics 83 (2): 219–41. DOI: 10.1017/S0034670520000996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvjf9z6v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed-Sandoval, Amy. 2015. “Deportations as Theaters of Inequality.” Public Affairs Quarterly 29 (2): 201–15.Google Scholar
Reed-Sandoval, Amy. 2021. “Oaxacan Transborder Communities and the Political Philosophy of Immigration.” In Latin American Immigration Ethics, eds. Reed-Sandoval, Amy and Cepeda, Luis Rubén Díaz. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. (1762) 1997. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, trans. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruhs, Martin. 2013. The Price of Rights: Regulating International Labor Migration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691132914.001.0001.Google Scholar
Ruhs, Martin, and Martin, Philip. 2008. “Numbers vs. Rights: Trade-Offs and Guest Worker Programs.” International Migration Review 42 (1): 249–65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00120.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sager, Alex. 2014. “Political Rights, Republican Freedom, and Temporary Workers.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (2): 189–211. DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2012.733586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Susanne K., Blauberger, Michael, and Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg. 2018. “Free Movement and Equal Treatment in an Unequal Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (10): 1391–1402. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1488887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skerry, Peter. 2013. “Splitting the Difference on Illegal Immigration.” National Affairs 14 (Winter): 3–26. https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/splitting-the-difference-on-illegal-immigration.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 2022. “Legal Civic Orders and Equitable Lived Citizenships.” American Political Science Review 116 (1): 101–15. DOI: 10.1017/S000305542100068X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Sarah. 2012. “The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory: Why the Demos Should Be Bounded by the State.” International Theory 4 (1): 39–68. DOI: 10.1017/S1752971911000248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Sarah. 2016. “Immigration and Democratic Principles: On Carens’ Ethics of Immigration.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (4): 450–56. DOI: 10.1111/japp.12188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Sarah. 2019. Immigration and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190909222.001.0001.Google Scholar
Song, Sarah, and Bloemraad, Irene. 2022. “Immigrant Legalization: A Dilemma between Justice and the Rule of Law.” Migration Studies 10 (3): 484–509. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mnac014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, Lynn. 2007. Transborder Lives: Indigenous Oaxacans in Mexico, California, and Oregon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822389965.Google Scholar
Stephen, Lynn. 2012. “Conceptualizing Transborder Communities.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Politics of International Migration, eds. Rosenblum, Marc R. and Tichenor, Daniel J., 456–77. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195337228.013.0019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilz, Anna. 2009. Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt7rj1r.Google Scholar
Stilz, Anna. 2019. Territorial Sovereignty: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198833536.003.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilz, Anna. 2022. “Economic Migration: On What Terms?” Perspectives on Politics 20 (3): 983–98. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592721002206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2011. “Democratic Exclusion (and Its Remedies?).” In Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays, 124–45. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1nnwhw0.9.Google Scholar
Valadez, Jorge M. 2008. “Immigration and the Territorial Powers of Nation-States.” APA Newsletter on Hispanic/Latino Issues in Philosophy 7 (2): 6–13.Google Scholar
Valadez, Jorge M. 2012. “Immigration, Self-Determination, and Global Justice: Towards a Holistic Normative Theory of Migration.” Journal of International Political Theory 8 (1–2): 135–46. DOI: 10.3366/jipt.2012.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Lindley. 2019. Democratic Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691190914.001.0001.Google Scholar