Skip to main content

Gender Equality in Academia: Bad News from the Trenches, and Some Possible Solutions

  • Kristen Monroe (a1), Saba Ozyurt (a1), Ted Wrigley (a1) and Amy Alexander (a1)

Is there gender discrimination in academia? Analysis of interviews with 80 female faculty at a large Research One university—the most comprehensive qualitative data set generated to date—suggests both individual and institutional discrimination persists. Overt discrimination has largely given way to less obvious but still deeply entrenched inequities. Despite apparent increases in women in positions of authority, discrimination continues to manifest itself through gender devaluation, a process whereby the status and power of an authoritative position is downplayed when that position is held by a woman, and through penalties for those agitating for political change. Female faculty find legal mechanisms and direct political action of limited utility, and increasingly turn to more subtle forms of incremental collective action, revealing an adaptive response to discrimination and a keen sense of the power dynamics within the university. Women attributed the persistence of gender inequality not to biology but to a professional environment in which university administrators care more about the appearance than the reality of gender equality and a professional culture based on a traditional, linear male model. Respondents described heart-wrenching choices between career and family responsibilities, with tensions especially intractable in the bench sciences. They advocated alternative models of professional life but also offered very specific interim suggestions for institutions genuinely interested in alleviating gender inequality and discrimination.

Hide All
Acker Sandra, and Armenti Carmen. 2004. Sleepless in academia. Gender and Education 16 (1): 324.
Aisenberg Nadya, and Harrington Mona. 1988. “A 2-tier Faculty System Reflects Old Social Rules That Restrict Women's Professional Development.” Chronicle of Higher Education 35(9): A56(1).
Babcock Linda, and Laschever Sara. 2003. Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bagihole Barbara. 2002. Against the odds: Women academics' research opportunities. In Gender, Teaching and Research in Higher Education. Challenges for the 21st Century, ed. Howie Gillian and Tauchert Ashley. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Bell Sandra, and Gordon Jane. 1999. Scholarship—the new dimension to equity issues for academic women. Women's Studies International Forum 22 (6): 645–58.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2002. Last accessed June 20, 2007.
Friedan Betty. 1963. The Feminine Mystique. New York: Dell.
Isaacs Ellen. 1995. “Gender Discrimination in the Workplace.” Last accessed June 20, 2007.
Koshland Daniel E. Jr. 1988. Women in science. Science 239, 1473.
Luke Carmen. 1999. Feminism in new times. In Everyday Knowledge and Uncommon Truths: Women of the Academy, ed. Christian-Smith L. and Kellor K.. Boulder: Westview Press.
McCoy Melanie, and DiGeorgio-Lutz JoAnn. 1999. The Woman-Centered University: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
MIT Report. 1999. “A Study on the Status on Women Faculty in Science at MIT.” MIT Faculty Newsletter, vol. XI, no. 4.
Monroe Kristen. 1996. The Heart of Altruism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Naff Katherine. 1994. Through the glass ceiling: Prospects for the advancement of women in the Federal Civil Service. Public Administration Review 54 (6): 507–14.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2004. National Study of Postsecondary Faculty.
Oakes Jeannie. 1990. Women and minorities in science and math. In Review of Research in Education, ed. Cazden Courtney B.. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 42
Total number of PDF views: 426 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2074 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.