Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kang, Michael S. and Shepherd, Joanna M. 2015. Partisanship in State Supreme Courts: The Empirical Relationship between Party Campaign Contributions and Judicial Decision Making. The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 44, Issue. S1, p. S161.


    Kriner, Douglas L. and Reeves, Andrew 2015. Presidential Particularism in Disaster Declarations and Military Base Closures. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 45, Issue. 4, p. 679.


    Greenberg, Michael R. Weiner, Marc D. Noland, Robert Herb, Jeanne Kaplan, Marjorie and Broccoli, Anthony J. 2014. Public Support for Policies to Reduce Risk After Hurricane Sandy. Risk Analysis, Vol. 34, Issue. 6, p. 997.


    Lowande, Kenneth S. 2014. The Contemporary PresidencyAfter the Orders: Presidential Memoranda and Unilateral Action. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 44, Issue. 4, p. 724.


    Rhodes, Jesse H. 2014. Party Polarization and the Ascendance of Bipartisan Posturing as a Dominant Strategy in Presidential Rhetoric. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 120.


    Greenberg, Michael R. Dyen, Susannah and Elliott, Stacey 2013. The Public’s Preparedness: Self-Reliance, Flashbulb Memories, and Conservative Values. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 103, Issue. 6, p. e85.


    Milkis, Sidney M. Tichenor, Daniel J. and Blessing, Laura 2013. The Historical Presidency: “Rallying Force”: The Modern Presidency, Social Movements, and the Transformation of American Politics. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 43, Issue. 3, p. 641.


    Spina, Nicholas 2013. Explaining political decentralization in parliamentary democracies. Comparative European Politics, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 428.


    Milkis, Sidney M. Rhodes, Jesse H. and Charnock, Emily J. 2012. What Happened to Post-Partisanship? Barack Obama and the New American Party System. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 10, Issue. 01, p. 57.


    JACOBSON, GARY C. 2009. The Effects of the George W. Bush Presidency on Partisan Attitudes. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 172.


    KELLEY, CHRISTOPHER S. and MARSHALL, BRYAN W. 2008. The Last Word: Presidential Power and the Role of Signing Statements. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 248.


    Milkis, Sidney M. 2007. THE RHETORICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRESIDENCIES. Critical Review, Vol. 19, Issue. 2-3, p. 379.


    ×

George W. Bush, the Republican Party, and the “New” American Party System

  • Sidney M. Milkis (a1) and Jesse H. Rhodes (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707071496
  • Published online: 01 September 2007
Abstract

Scholars have long expressed concern that the ascendance of the modern presidency since the New Deal and World War II, by hastening the decline of political parties and fostering the expansion of the administrative state, portended an era of chronically low public engagement and voter turnout and an increasingly fractious and impotent national politics. Presidents' inattentiveness to the demands of party-building and grassroots mobilization, coupled with their willingness to govern through administration, were seen as key obstacles to the revitalization of a politics based in widespread political interest and collective responsibility for public policy. This article argues that George W. Bush's potent combination of party leadership and executive administration, foreshadowed by Ronald Reagan's earlier efforts, suggests the emergence of a new presidential leadership synthesis and a “new” party system. This new synthesis does not promise a return to pre-modern party politics; rather, it indicates a rearticulation of the relationship between the presidency and the party system. The erosion of old old-style partisan politics allowed for a more national and issue-based party system to develop, forging new links between presidents and parties. As the 2006 elections reveal, however, it remains to be seen whether such parties, which are inextricably linked to executive-centered politics and governance, can perform the critical function of moderating presidential ambition and mobilizing public support for party principles and policies.Sidney M. Milkis is Professors of Politics (smm8e@cms.mail.virginia.edu) and Jesse H. Rhodes is a doctoral student (jhr7t@cms.mail.virginia.edu) at the University of Virginia. The authors would like to thank the anonymous readers who reviewed the manuscript for their thoughtful and constructive comments.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×