Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

George W. Bush, the Republican Party, and the “New” American Party System

  • Sidney M. Milkis (a1) and Jesse H. Rhodes (a2)
Abstract

Scholars have long expressed concern that the ascendance of the modern presidency since the New Deal and World War II, by hastening the decline of political parties and fostering the expansion of the administrative state, portended an era of chronically low public engagement and voter turnout and an increasingly fractious and impotent national politics. Presidents' inattentiveness to the demands of party-building and grassroots mobilization, coupled with their willingness to govern through administration, were seen as key obstacles to the revitalization of a politics based in widespread political interest and collective responsibility for public policy. This article argues that George W. Bush's potent combination of party leadership and executive administration, foreshadowed by Ronald Reagan's earlier efforts, suggests the emergence of a new presidential leadership synthesis and a “new” party system. This new synthesis does not promise a return to pre-modern party politics; rather, it indicates a rearticulation of the relationship between the presidency and the party system. The erosion of old old-style partisan politics allowed for a more national and issue-based party system to develop, forging new links between presidents and parties. As the 2006 elections reveal, however, it remains to be seen whether such parties, which are inextricably linked to executive-centered politics and governance, can perform the critical function of moderating presidential ambition and mobilizing public support for party principles and policies.Sidney M. Milkis is Professors of Politics (smm8e@cms.mail.virginia.edu) and Jesse H. Rhodes is a doctoral student (jhr7t@cms.mail.virginia.edu) at the University of Virginia. The authors would like to thank the anonymous readers who reviewed the manuscript for their thoughtful and constructive comments.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Aldrich, John H. 1999. Political parties in a critical era. American Politics Research 27 (1): 932.

Bartels, Larry M. 2000. Partisanship and voting behavior 1952–1996. American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 3550.

Bartels, Larry M. 2005. Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics 3 (1): 1531.

Bimes, Terri, and Stephen Skowronek. 1996. Woodrow Wilson's critique of popular leadership: Reassessing the modern-traditional divide in presidential history. Polity 29 (1): 2763.

Black, Merle. 2004. The transformation of the southern Democratic Party. Journal of Politics 66 (4): 100117.

Conway, M. Margaret. 1983. Republican political party nationalization, campaign activities, and their implications for the party system. Publius 13 (1): 117.

Cotter, Cornelius P., and John F. Bibby. 1980. Institutionalization of parties and the thesis of party decline. Political Science Quarterly 95 (1): 127.

Druckman, James, Lawrence Jacobs, and Eric Ostermeier. 2004. Candidate strategies to prime issues and image. Journal of Politics 66 (4): 1180202.

Fusarelli, Lance D. 2005. Gubernatorial reactions to No Child Left Behind: Politics, pressure, and education reform. Peabody Journal of Education 80 (2): 12036.

Galvin, Daniel, and Colleen Shogan. 2004. Presidential politicization and centralization across the modern-traditional divide. Polity 36 (April): 477504.

Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. 2005. Abandoning the middle: The Bush tax cuts and the limits of Democratic control. Perspectives on Politics 3 (1): 3353.

Herrnson, Paul S. 1986. Do parties make a difference? The role of party organizations in congressional elections. Journal of Politics 48 (3): 589615.

Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review 95 (3): 61931.

Howell, William G. 2005. Unilateral powers: A brief overview. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (3): 41739.

Howell, William G., and David E. Lewis. 2002. Agencies by presidential design. Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1095114.

Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Melanie Burns. 2004. The second face of the public presidency: Presidential polling and the shift from policy to personality polling. Presidential Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 53656.

Jacobson, Gary C. 1985–1986. Party organization and distribution of campaign resources: Republicans and Democrats in 1982. Political Science Quarterly 100 (4): 60325.

Jacobson, Gary C. 2003. Terror, terrain, and turnout: Explaining the 2002 midterm elections. Political Science Quarterly 118 (1): 122.

Klinghard, Daniel P. 2005. Grover Cleveland, William McKinley, and the emergence of the president as party leader. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (4): 73660.

Ladd, Everett Carl. 1985. On mandates, realignments, and the 1984 presidential election. Political Science Quarterly 100 (1): 125.

Lim, Elvin T. 2002. Five trends in presidential rhetoric: An analysis of rhetoric from George Washington to Bill Clinton. Presidential Studies Quarterly 32 (2): 32848.

Moe, Terry M., and William G. Howell. 1999. The presidential power of unilateral action. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1): 13279.

Ragsdale, Lyn, and John J. Thies III. 1997. The institutionalization of the American presidency, 1924–92. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1280318.

Schier, Steven E. 2003. George W. Bush's presidential project and its prospects. The Forum 1 (4): Article 2. http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol1/iss4/art2.

Shea, Daniel M. 1999. The passing of realignment and the advent of the “base-less” party system. American Politics Quarterly 27:1 (January) 3357.

Skowronek, Stephen. 2005. Leadership by definition: First term reflections on George W. Bush's political stance. Perspectives on Politics 3 (4): 81731.

West, William F. 2005. The Institutionalization of Regulatory Review: Organizational Stability and Responsive Competence at OIRA. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (1): 7693.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 15 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 122 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.