Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 47
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Albertus, Michael and Menaldo, Victor 2016. Capital in the Twenty-First Century—in the Rest of the World. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 49.

    Druckman, James N. and Lupia, Arthur 2016. Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 13.

    Lavery, Lesley E. 2016. What parents stilldo notknow about No Child Left Behind and why it matters. Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 343.

    Sajuria, Javier and Fábrega, Jorge 2016. Digital Methods for Social Science.

    Amiel, Yoram Bernasconi, Michele Cowell, Frank and Dardanoni, Valentino 2015. Do we value mobility?. Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 231.

    Béland, Daniel and Waddan, Alex 2015. Breaking down ideas and institutions: the politics of tax policy in the USA and the UK. Policy Studies, Vol. 36, Issue. 2, p. 176.

    Broockman, David E. and Butler, Daniel M. 2015. The Causal Effects of Elite Position-Taking on Voter Attitudes: Field Experiments with Elite Communication. American Journal of Political Science, p. n/a.

    Dusso, Aaron 2015. Incorrect voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election: How partisan and economic cues fail to help low-information voters. Electoral Studies, Vol. 37, p. 50.

    Einstein, Katherine Levine and Glick, David M. 2015. Do I Think BLS Data are BS? The Consequences of Conspiracy Theories. Political Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 679.

    Hojnacki, Marie Marchetti, Kathleen M Baumgartner, Frank R Berry, Jeffrey M Kimball, David C and Leech, Beth L 2015. Assessing business advantage in Washington lobbying. Interest Groups & Advocacy, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 205.

    Kahmann, Birte Stumpf, Klara Helene and Baumgärtner, Stefan 2015. Notions of justice held by stakeholders of the Newfoundland fishery. Marine Policy, Vol. 62, p. 37.

    Kuziemko, Ilyana Norton, Michael I. Saez, Emmanuel and Stantcheva, Stefanie 2015. How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments†. American Economic Review, Vol. 105, Issue. 4, p. 1478.

    Park, EunHyung and Lee, Jea-Wan 2015. A study on policy literacy and public attitudes toward government innovation-focusing on Government 3.0 in South Korea. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 1, Issue. 1,

    Roosma, Femke van Oorschot, Wim and Gelissen, John 2015. A Just Distribution of Burdens? Attitudes Toward the Social Distribution of Taxes in 26 Welfare States. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, p. edv020.

    Shepherd, Steven Chartrand, Tanya L. and Fitzsimons, Gavan J. 2015. When Brands Reflect Our Ideal World: The Values and Brand Preferences of Consumers Who Support versus Reject Society’s Dominant Ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 42, Issue. 1, p. 76.

    Sumino, Takanori 2015. Level or Concentration? A Cross-national Analysis of Public Attitudes Towards Taxation Policies. Social Indicators Research,

    Tesler, Michael 2015. Priming Predispositions and Changing Policy Positions: An Account of When Mass Opinion Is Primed or Changed. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 4, p. 806.

    Vigoda-Gadot, Eran and Cohen, Haim 2015. Service satisfaction and organizational image. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 2.

    Weakliem, David L. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    Bredemeier, Christian 2014. Imperfect information and the Meltzer-Richard hypothesis. Public Choice, Vol. 159, Issue. 3-4, p. 561.


Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind

  • Larry M. Bartels (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 March 2005

In 2001 and 2003, the Bush administration engineered two enormous tax cuts primarily benefiting very wealthy taxpayers. Most Americans supported these tax cuts. I argue that they did so not because they were indifferent to economic inequality, but because they largely failed to connect inequality and public policy. Three out of every four people polled said that the difference in incomes between rich people and poor people has increased in the past 20 years, and most of them added that that is a bad thing—but most of those people still supported the regressive 2001 Bush tax cut and the even more regressive repeal of the estate tax. Several manifestly relevant considerations had negligible or seemingly perverse effects on these policy views, including assessments of the wastefulness of government spending and desires for additional spending on a variety of government programs. Support for the Bush tax cuts was strongly shaped by people's attitudes about their own tax burdens, but virtually unaffected by their attitudes about the tax burden of the rich—even in the case of the estate tax, which only affects the wealthiest one or two percent of taxpayers. Public opinion in this instance was ill informed, insensitive to some of the most important implications of the tax cuts, and largely disconnected from (or misconnected to) a variety of relevant values and material interests.Larry M. Bartels is the Donald E. Stokes Professor of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University ( He directs the Center for the Study of Democratic Politics in Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. This article is a revised and abridged version of a paper originally presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association and subsequently presented in seminars and conferences at the University of Michigan, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Brookings Institution, Harvard University, Demos, and Princeton University, and at the 2004 meeting of the Russell Sage Foundation's University Working Groups on the Social Dimensions of Inequality. The author is grateful to numerous seminar and conference participants, colleagues, students, and friends for their criticism and support. He is also grateful to the Russell Sage Foundation for generous financial support of his research through a grant to the Princeton Working Group on Inequality, and for additional support of the primary data collection on which the present report is based.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *