Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Beaulieu, Emily 2016. Electronic Voting and Perceptions of Election Fraud and Fairness. Journal of Experimental Political Science, Vol. 3, Issue. 01, p. 18.

    Wilson, David C. and King-Meadows, Tyson 2016. Perceived electoral malfeasance and resentment over the election of Barack Obama. Electoral Studies, Vol. 44, p. 35.

    Beaulieu, Emily 2014. From voter ID to party ID: How political parties affect perceptions of election fraud in the U.S.. Electoral Studies, Vol. 35, p. 24.

    Bentele, Keith G. and O'Brien, Erin E. 2013. Jim Crow 2.0? Why States Consider and Adopt Restrictive Voter Access Policies.. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 11, Issue. 04, p. 1088.

    Swarts, Heidi 2013. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements.

    Wilson, D. C. and Brewer, P. R. 2013. The Foundations of Public Opinion on Voter ID Laws: Political Predispositions, Racial Resentment, and Information Effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 77, Issue. 4, p. 962.

    Williamson, Vanessa Skocpol, Theda and Coggin, John 2011. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 9, Issue. 01, p. 25.


How ACORN Was Framed: Political Controversy and Media Agenda Setting

  • Peter Dreier (a1) and Christopher R. Martin (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 13 August 2010

Using the news controversy over the community group ACORN, we illustrate the way that the media help set the agenda for public debate and frame the way that debate is shaped. Opinion entrepreneurs (primarily business and conservative groups and individuals, often working through web sites) set the story in motion as early as 2006, the conservative echo chamber orchestrated an anti-ACORN campaign in 2008, the Republican presidential campaign repeated the allegations with a more prominent platform, and the mainstream media reported the allegations without investigating their veracity. As a result, the little-known community organization became the subject of great controversy in the 2008 US presidential campaign, and was recognizable by 82 percent of respondents in a national survey. We analyze 2007–2008 coverage of ACORN by 15 major news media organizations and the narrative frames of their 647 stories during that period. Voter fraud was the dominant story frame, with 55 percent of the stories analyzed using it. We demonstrate that the national news media agenda is easily permeated by a persistent media campaign by opinion entrepreneurs alleging controversy, even when there is little or no truth to the story. Conversely, local news media, working outside of elite national news media sources to verify the most essential facts of the story, were the least likely to latch onto the “voter fraud” bandwagon.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Scott L. Althaus , and David Tewksbury . 2002. “Agenda Setting and the ‘New’ News: Of Issue Importance among Readers of thePaper and Online Versions of The New York Times.” Communication Research 29: 180207.

W. Lance Bennett , Regina G. Lawrence , and Steven Livingston . 2007. When The Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Richard Campbell , Christopher R. Martin , and Bettina Fabos . 2010. Media & Culture: An Introduction to Mass Communication, 7th ed.Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.

Steven H. Chaffee , and Miriam J. Metzger . 2001. “The End of Mass Communication?Mass Communication & Society 4(4): 365–79.

Dennis Chong , and James N. Druckman . 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–26.

Peter Dreier . 2005. “How the Media Compounds Urban Problems,Journal of Urban Affairs 27(2): 193201.

Robert M. Entman 2003. “Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House's Frame After 9/11.” Political Communication 20: 415–32.

Robert M. Entman 2007. “Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power.” Journal of Communication 57: 163–73.

Stephen Hart . 2001. Cultural Dilemmas of Progressive Politics: Styles of Engagement Among Grassroots Activists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Donald R. Kinder 2007. “Curmudgeonly Advice.” Journal of Communication 57: 155–62.

Jae Kook Lee . 2007. “The Effect of the Internet on Homogeneity of the Media Agenda: A Test of the Fragmentation Thesis.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 84(4): 745–60.

Christopher R. Martin 2008b. “'Upscale' News Audiences and the Transformation of Labour News.” Journalism Studies 9(2): 178–94.

Maxwell McCombs , and Donald Shaw . 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176–87.

Maxwell E. McCombs , and Donald L. Shaw . 1993. “The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas.” Journal of Communication 43(2): 5867.

Marilyn Roberts , Wayne Wanta , and Tzong-Horng (Dustin) Dzwo . 2002. “Agenda Setting and Issue Salience Online.” Communication Research 29(4): 452–65.

Kaye D. Sweetser , Guy J. Golan , and Wayne Wanta . 2008. “Intermedia Agenda Setting in Television, Advertising, and Blogs During the 2004 Election.” Mass Communication & Society 11: 197216.

Wenmouth Williams Jr., Mitchell Shapiro , and Craig Cutbirth . 1983. “The Impact of Campaign Agendas on Perceptions of Issues in the 1980 Campaign.” Journalism Quarterly 60: 226–31.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *