Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 37
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Barnett, Michael 2016. Accountability and global governance: The view from paternalism. Regulation & Governance, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 134.

    Löfquist, Lars 2016. Virtues and humanitarian ethics. Disasters, p. n/a.

    Meininghaus, Esther 2016. Humanitarianism in intra-state conflict: aid inequality and local governance in government- and opposition-controlled areas in the Syrian war. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 37, Issue. 8, p. 1454.

    Moshtari, Mohammad and Gonçalves, Paulo 2016. Factors Influencing Interorganizational Collaboration within a Disaster Relief Context. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,

    Narang, Neil 2016. Forgotten Conflicts: Need versus Political Priority in the Allocation of Humanitarian Aid across Conflict Areas. International Interactions, Vol. 42, Issue. 2, p. 189.

    Olivius, Elisabeth 2016. Constructing Humanitarian Selves and Refugee Others. International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 270.

    Keck, Michelle 2015. Comparing the Determinants of US-Funded NGO Aid Versus US Official Development Aid. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 26, Issue. 4, p. 1314.

    Kim, Youngwan and Nunnenkamp, Peter 2015. Does It Pay for US-based NGOs to Go to War? Empirical Evidence for Afghanistan and Iraq. Development and Change, Vol. 46, Issue. 3, p. 387.

    Mitoma, Glenn and Bystrom, Kerry 2015. Human Rights Protection in Global Politics.

    Rigterink, Anouk S. 2015. Does Security Imply Safety? On the (Lack of) Correlation Between Different Aspects of Security. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, Vol. 4, Issue. 1,

    Asgary, Ramin and Lawrence, Katharine 2014. Characteristics, determinants and perspectives of experienced medical humanitarians: a qualitative approach: Table 1. BMJ Open, Vol. 4, Issue. 12, p. e006460.

    Hendrix, Cullen S. and Wong, Wendy H. 2014. Knowing your audience: How the structure of international relations and organizational choices affect amnesty international’s advocacy. The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 29.

    Kevlihan, Rob DeRouen, Karl and Biglaiser, Glen 2014. Is US Humanitarian Aid Based Primarily on Need or Self-Interest?. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 58, Issue. 4, p. 839.

    Sezgin, Zeynep and Dijkzeul, Dennis 2014. Migrant Organisations in Humanitarian Action. Journal of International Migration and Integration, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 159.

    Wisotzki, Simone and Hofmann, Gregor P. 2014. Global Governance Efforts in Tension between Humanitarian Concerns and Statist Sovereignty Rights. International Negotiation, Vol. 19, Issue. 3, p. 487.

    Asgary, Ramin and Junck, Emily 2013. New trends of short-term humanitarian medical volunteerism: professional and ethical considerations. Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 39, Issue. 10, p. 625.

    Barnett, Michael N. 2013. Humanitarian Governance. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 379.

    Dandoy, Arnaud and Pérouse de Montclos, Marc-Antoine 2013. Humanitarian workers in peril? Deconstructing the myth of the new and growing threat to humanitarian workers. Global Crime, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 341.

    Goodhand, Jonathan 2013. Contested boundaries: NGOs and civil–military relations in Afghanistan. Central Asian Survey, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 287.

    Hirono, Miwa 2013. Three legacies of humanitarianism in China. Disasters, Vol. 37, p. S202.


Humanitarianism Transformed

  • Michael Barnett (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 December 2005

The scale, scope, and significance of humanitarian action have expanded significantly since the late 1980s. This article reflects on two ways in which humanitarianism has been transformed. First, its purpose has been politicized. Whereas once humanitarian actors attempted to insulate themselves from the world of politics, they now work closely with states and attempt to eliminate the root causes of conflict that place individuals at risk. Second, a field of humanitarianism has become institutionalized; during the 1990s the field and its agencies became more professionalized and rationalized. Drawing on various strands of organizational theory, I examine the forces that have contributed to these transformations. I then explore how these transformations have changed the nature of what humanitarian organizations are and what they do. In the conclusion I consider how the transformation of humanitarianism links to the relationship between international nongovernmental organizations and world order, including the purpose of humanitarian action and its distinctive function in global politics.Michael Barnett is Harold Stassen Chair of International Relations at the Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs and professor of political science at the University of Minnesota ( In 2004–5 he was a visiting associate at the Center on International Cooperation at the Center on International Cooperation. The author thanks Bud Duvall, Kevin Hartigan, Martha Finnemore, Abby Stoddard, Ron Kassimir, Craig Calhoun, Jack Snyder, Adele Harmer, the participants of the Minnesota International Relations Colloquium, and three anonymous reviewers for Perspectives on Politics for their comments and corrections. Special thanks to the Social Sciences Research Council and the participants in its series on “The Transformation of Humanitarian Action.”

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *