Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 58
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Béland, Daniel 2016. Identity, politics, and public policy. Critical Policy Studies, p. 1.

    Darwich, May 2016. Ideational and Material Forces in Threat Perception: The Divergent Cases of Syria and Saudi Arabia During the Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988). Journal of Global Security Studies, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 142.

    Guinjoan, Marc and Rodon, Toni 2016. A Scrutiny of the Linz-Moreno Question. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 128.

    Hebel, Kai and Lenz, Tobias 2016. The identity/policy nexus in European foreign policy. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 23, Issue. 4, p. 473.

    Ide, Tobias 2016. Space, discourse and environmental peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, p. 1.

    Mader, Matthias 2016. Stabilität und Wandel der nationalen Identität in der deutschen Bevölkerung. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie,

    Mesquita, Rafael 2016. The hegemonichermano: South American collective identity and Brazilian regional strategy. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 215.

    Park, Hong Min and Smith, Steven S. 2016. Partisanship, Sophistication, and Public Attitudes about Majority Rule and Minority Rights in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly,

    Watson, Cate and Drew, Valerie 2016. Enacting educational partnership: collective identity, decision-making (and the importance of muffin chat). School Leadership & Management, p. 1.

    Adalbert Hampel, Karl 2015. The dark(er) side of ‘state failure’: state formation and socio-political variation. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 36, Issue. 9, p. 1629.

    Coretti, Lorenzo and Pica, Daniele 2015. The rise and fall of collective identity in networked movements: communication protocols, Facebook, and the anti-Berlusconi protest. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 18, Issue. 8, p. 951.

    Gruber, Barbara and Pospisil, Jan 2015. ‘Ser Eleno’: Insurgent identity formation in the ELN. Small Wars & Insurgencies, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 226.

    Hagström, Linus and Gustafsson, Karl 2015. Japan and identity change: why it matters in International Relations. The Pacific Review, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Ide, Tobias 2015. Why do conflicts over scarce renewable resources turn violent? A qualitative comparative analysis. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 33, p. 61.

    Kaarbo, Juliet 2015. A Foreign Policy Analysis Perspective on the Domestic Politics Turn in IR Theory. International Studies Review, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 189.

    Knott, Eleanor 2015. What Does it Mean to Be a Kin Majority? Analyzing Romanian Identity in Moldova and Russian Identity in Crimea from Below. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 96, Issue. 3, p. 830.

    Layton, Peter 2015. The 2015 National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review choices: grand strategy, risk management or opportunism?. Defence Studies, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 28.

    Marquardt, Kyle L. and Herrera, Yoshiko M. 2015. Ethnicity as a Variable: An Assessment of Measures and Data Sets of Ethnicity and Related Identities*. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 96, Issue. 3, p. 689.

    Oros, Andrew L. 2015. International and domestic challenges to Japan's postwar security identity: ‘norm constructivism’ and Japan's new ‘proactive pacifism’. The Pacific Review, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 139.

    Radnitz, Scott 2015. Ethnic Cues and Redistributive Preferences in Post-Soviet Georgia. Studies in Comparative International Development,


Identity as a Variable

  • Rawi Abdelal (a1), Yoshiko M. Herrera (a2), Alastair Iain Johnston (a3) and Rose McDermott (a4)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 December 2006

As scholarly interest in the concept of identity continues to grow, social identities are proving to be crucially important for understanding contemporary life. Despite—or perhaps because of—the sprawl of different treatments of identity in the social sciences, the concept has remained too analytically loose to be as useful a tool as the literature's early promise had suggested. We propose to solve this longstanding problem by developing the analytical rigor and methodological imagination that will make identity a more useful variable for the social sciences. This article offers more precision by defining collective identity as a social category that varies along two dimensions—content and contestation. Content describes the meaning of a collective identity. The content of social identities may take the form of four non-mutually-exclusive types: constitutive norms; social purposes; relational comparisons with other social categories; and cognitive models. Contestation refers to the degree of agreement within a group over the content of the shared category. Our conceptualization thus enables collective identities to be compared according to the agreement and disagreement about their meanings by the members of the group. The final section of the article looks at the methodology of identity scholarship. Addressing the wide array of methodological options on identity—including discourse analysis, surveys, and content analysis, as well as promising newer methods like experiments, agent-based modeling, and cognitive mapping—we hope to provide the kind of brush clearing that will enable the field to move forward methodologically as well.Rawi Abdelal is Associate Professor, Harvard Business School ( Yoshiko M. Herrera is Associate Professor, Government Department, Harvard University ( Alastair Iain Johnston is Professor, Government Department, Harvard University ( Rose McDermott is Associate Professor, Political Science Department, University of California at Santa Barbara ( Research for the paper was made possible by the generous support of the Weatherhead Initiative of the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs at Harvard University. We are grateful to those who commented on earlier versions of this paper: Peter Burke, Lars-Erik Cederman, Jeff Checkel,Michael Dawson, James Fearon, David Frank, Erin Jenne, Michael Jones-Correa, Cynthia Kaplan, Peter Katzenstein, Herb Kelman, Paul Kowert, David Laitin, Daniel Posner, Paul Sniderman, Werner Sollors, Jeff Strabone, Philip Stone, Ronald Suny, Charles Tilly, Mary Waters, and three anonymous reviewers. We would also like to thank participants of the 2004 Identity as a Variable conference, including Henry Brady, Kanchan Chandra, Jack Citrin, Neta Crawford, Jennifer Hochschild, Jacques Hymans, Ted Hopf, Cynthia Kaplan, Ulrich Krotz, Taeku Lee, Will Lowe, Jason Lyall, Kimberly Neuendorf, Roger Petersen, Kevin Quinn, David Rousseau, Rogers Smith, Donald Sylvan, Kim Williams, and Michael Young, for comments on this version.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *