Skip to main content

Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics

  • Matt Grossmann and David A. Hopkins

Scholarship commonly implies that the major political parties in the United States are configured as mirror images to each other, but the two sides actually exhibit important and underappreciated differences. The Republican Party is primarily the agent of an ideological movement whose supporters prize doctrinal purity, while the Democratic Party is better understood as a coalition of social groups seeking concrete government action. This asymmetry is reinforced by American public opinion, which favors left-of-center positions on most specific policy issues yet simultaneously shares the general conservative preference for smaller and less active government. Each party therefore faces a distinctive governing challenge in balancing the unique demands of its base with the need to maintain broad popular support. This foundational difference between the parties also explains why the rise of the Tea Party movement among Republicans in recent years has not been accompanied by an equivalent ideological insurgency among Democrats.

Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?Journal of Politics 70(2): 542–55.
Aldrich, John. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands, and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 571–97.
Byrne, Janet. 2012. The Occupy Handbook. New York: Back Bay Books.
Converse, Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter., David E. New York: Free Press.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desmarais, Bruce A., La Raja, Raymond J., and Kowal, Michael S.. 2014. “The Fates of Challengers in U.S. House Elections: The Role of Extended Party Networks in Supporting Candidates and Shaping Electoral Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science, online preview at
Disch, Lisa. 2012. “Democratic Representation and the Constituency Paradox.” Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 599616.
Ellis, Christopher, and Stimson, James. 2012. Ideology in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John. 1992. “The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.” American Journal of Political Science 36(1): 268307.
Fiorina, Morris P. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson.
Fiorina, Morris P. 2009. Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Francia, Peter L., Herrnson, Paul S., Green, John C., Powell, Lynda W., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2003. The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates. New York: Columbia University Press.
Free, Lloyd A., and Cantril, Hadley. 1967. The Political Beliefs of Americans: A Study of Public Opinion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Freeman, Jo. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101(3): 327–56.
Galvin, Daniel. 2010. Presidential Party Building: Dwight D. Eisenhower to George W. Bush. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gerring, John. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grossmann, Matt, and Dominguez, Casey B. K.. 2009. “Party Coalitions and Interest Group Networks.” American Politics Research 37(5): 767800.
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2014. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 643–62.
Hagner, Paul R. and Pierce, John C.. 1982. “Conceptualization and Party Identification: 1956–1976.” American Journal of Political Science 26(2): 377–87.
Hagner, Paul R., Pierce, John C., and Knight, Kathleen. 1989. Content Codings of Levels of Political Conceptualization, 1956–1984. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR.
Heritage Action. 2011. “Heritage Action Releases Legislative Scorecard.” Press release, August 25., accessed October 20, 2014.
Herrnson, Paul S. 2009. “The Roles of Party Organizations, Party-Connected Committees, and Party Allies in Elections,” Journal of Politics 71(4): 1207–24.
Hibbing, John R., Smith, Kevin B., and Alford, John R.. 2014. Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences. New York: Routledge.
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2013. “Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: March 2013.”, accessed October 20, 2014.
Kaplan, Rebecca. 2013. “Boehner: Conservative Groups Have ‘Lost All Credibility.’CBS News, December 12., accessed October 20, 2014.
Karol, David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kibbe, Matt. 2013. “Fighting a Hostile Takeover of Freedom’s Party.” Politico, November 12., accessed October 20, 2014.
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koger, Gregory, Masket, Seth, and Noel, Hans. 2009. “Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party Networks.” British Journal of Political Science 39(3): 633–53.
Lane, Robert E. 1962. Political Ideology: Why the American Common Man Believes What He Does. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., and Horowitz, Juliana Menasce. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83110.
Lelkes, Yphtach, and Sniderman, Paul M.. Forthcoming. “The Ideological Asymmetry of the American Party System.” British Journal of Political Science.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, Helmut, and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012a. It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012b. “Let’s Just Say It: The Republicans Are the Problem.” Washington Post, April 27., accessed October 20, 2014.
Masket, Seth. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Mayhew, David R. 1966. Party Loyalty among Congressmen: The Difference between Democrats and Republicans, 1947–1962. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mayhew, David R. 1986. Placing Parties in American Politics: Organization, Electoral Settings, and Government Activity in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nexon, David. 1971. “Asymmetry in the Political System: Occasional Activists in the Republican and Democratic Parties, 1956–1964.” American Political Science Review 65(3): 716–30.
Nicholson, Stephen P., and Segura, Gary M.. 2005. “Issue Agendas and the Politics of Latino Partisan Identification.” In Diversity in Democracy: Minority Representation in the United States, ed. Segura, Gary M. and Bowler, Shaun. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Noel, Hans. 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parker, Christopher S., and Barreto, Matt A.. 2013. Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rucker, Philip. 2009. “S.C. Senator Is a Voice of Reform Opposition.” Washington Post, July 28, A01.
Skocpol, Theda, and Williamson, Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Skrentny, John D. 2004. The Minority Right Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Sowell, Thomas. 1987. A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles. New York: William Morrow & Company.
Stettner, Edward A. 1993. Shaping Modern Liberalism: Herbert Croly and Progressive Thought. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Vandehei, Jim, Allen, Mike, and Sherman, Jake. 2013. “Double Trouble: House GOP Eyes Default, Shutdown.” Politico, January 13., accessed October 20, 2014.
Volkens, Andrea, Lehmann, Pola, Merz, Nicolas, Regel, Sven, and Werner, Annika. 2013. Comparative Manifestos Project. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
Walker, Jack L. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ware, Alan. 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 83
Total number of PDF views: 471 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2418 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.