Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics

Abstract

Scholarship commonly implies that the major political parties in the United States are configured as mirror images to each other, but the two sides actually exhibit important and underappreciated differences. The Republican Party is primarily the agent of an ideological movement whose supporters prize doctrinal purity, while the Democratic Party is better understood as a coalition of social groups seeking concrete government action. This asymmetry is reinforced by American public opinion, which favors left-of-center positions on most specific policy issues yet simultaneously shares the general conservative preference for smaller and less active government. Each party therefore faces a distinctive governing challenge in balancing the unique demands of its base with the need to maintain broad popular support. This foundational difference between the parties also explains why the rise of the Tea Party movement among Republicans in recent years has not been accompanied by an equivalent ideological insurgency among Democrats.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Alan I. Abramowitz , and Kyle L. Saunders . 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?Journal of Politics 70(2): 542–55.

John Aldrich . 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kathleen Bawn , Martin Cohen , David Karol , Seth Masket , Hans Noel , and John Zaller . 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands, and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 571–97.

Gary W. Cox , and Mathew D. McCubbins . 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Christopher Ellis , and James Stimson . 2012. Ideology in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stanley Feldman , and John Zaller . 1992. “The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.” American Journal of Political Science 36(1): 268307.

Jo Freeman . 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101(3): 327–56.

John Gerring . 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Matt Grossmann , and Casey B. K. Dominguez . 2009. “Party Coalitions and Interest Group Networks.” American Politics Research 37(5): 767800.

Jacob S. Hacker , and Paul Pierson . 2014. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 643–62.

David Karol . 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Herbert Kitschelt . 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gregory Koger , Seth Masket , and Hans Noel . 2009. “Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party Networks.” British Journal of Political Science 39(3): 633–53.

Geoffrey C. Layman , Thomas M. Carsey , and Juliana Menasce Horowitz . 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83110.

Michael S. Lewis-Beck , William G. Jacoby , Helmut Norpoth , and Herbert F. Weisberg . 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Seth Masket . 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

David R Mayhew . 1966. Party Loyalty among Congressmen: The Difference between Democrats and Republicans, 1947–1962. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

David Nexon . 1971. “Asymmetry in the Political System: Occasional Activists in the Republican and Democratic Parties, 1956–1964.” American Political Science Review 65(3): 716–30.

Hans Noel . 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Theda Skocpol , and Vanessa Williamson . 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jack L Walker . 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Alan Ware . 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 45
Total number of PDF views: 190 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1537 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.