Skip to main content
×
Home

Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics

Abstract

Scholarship commonly implies that the major political parties in the United States are configured as mirror images to each other, but the two sides actually exhibit important and underappreciated differences. The Republican Party is primarily the agent of an ideological movement whose supporters prize doctrinal purity, while the Democratic Party is better understood as a coalition of social groups seeking concrete government action. This asymmetry is reinforced by American public opinion, which favors left-of-center positions on most specific policy issues yet simultaneously shares the general conservative preference for smaller and less active government. Each party therefore faces a distinctive governing challenge in balancing the unique demands of its base with the need to maintain broad popular support. This foundational difference between the parties also explains why the rise of the Tea Party movement among Republicans in recent years has not been accompanied by an equivalent ideological insurgency among Democrats.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abramowitz Alan I., and Saunders Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?Journal of Politics 70(2): 542–55.
Aldrich John. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bawn Kathleen, Cohen Martin, Karol David, Masket Seth, Noel Hans, and Zaller John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands, and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 571–97.
Byrne Janet. 2012. The Occupy Handbook. New York: Back Bay Books.
Converse Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter. David E. New York: Free Press.
Cox Gary W., and McCubbins Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desmarais Bruce A., La Raja Raymond J., and Kowal Michael S.. 2014. “The Fates of Challengers in U.S. House Elections: The Role of Extended Party Networks in Supporting Candidates and Shaping Electoral Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science, online preview at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12106/abstract
Disch Lisa. 2012. “Democratic Representation and the Constituency Paradox.” Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 599616.
Ellis Christopher, and Stimson James. 2012. Ideology in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman Stanley, and Zaller John. 1992. “The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.” American Journal of Political Science 36(1): 268307.
Fiorina Morris P. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson.
Fiorina Morris P. 2009. Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Francia Peter L., Herrnson Paul S., Green John C., Powell Lynda W., and Wilcox Clyde. 2003. The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates. New York: Columbia University Press.
Free Lloyd A., and Cantril Hadley. 1967. The Political Beliefs of Americans: A Study of Public Opinion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Freeman Jo. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101(3): 327–56.
Galvin Daniel. 2010. Presidential Party Building: Dwight D. Eisenhower to George W. Bush. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gerring John. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grossmann Matt, and Dominguez Casey B. K.. 2009. “Party Coalitions and Interest Group Networks.” American Politics Research 37(5): 767800.
Hacker Jacob S., and Pierson Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hacker Jacob S., and Pierson Paul. 2014. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 643–62.
Hagner Paul R. and Pierce John C.. 1982. “Conceptualization and Party Identification: 1956–1976.” American Journal of Political Science 26(2): 377–87.
Hagner Paul R., Pierce John C., and Knight Kathleen. 1989. Content Codings of Levels of Political Conceptualization, 1956–1984. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR.
Heritage Action. 2011. “Heritage Action Releases Legislative Scorecard.” Press release, August 25. http://heritageaction.com/2011/08/heritage-action-releases-legislative-scorecard/, accessed October 20, 2014.
Herrnson Paul S. 2009. “The Roles of Party Organizations, Party-Connected Committees, and Party Allies in Elections,” Journal of Politics 71(4): 1207–24.
Hibbing John R., Smith Kevin B., and Alford John R.. 2014. Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences. New York: Routledge.
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2013. “Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: March 2013.” http://kff.org/health-reform/poll-finding/march-2013-tracking-poll/, accessed October 20, 2014.
Kaplan Rebecca. 2013. “Boehner: Conservative Groups Have ‘Lost All Credibility.’CBS News, December 12. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/boehner-conservative-groups-have-lost-all-credibility/, accessed October 20, 2014.
Karol David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kibbe Matt. 2013. “Fighting a Hostile Takeover of Freedom’s Party.” Politico, November 12. http://politi.co/1pMFUWA, accessed October 20, 2014.
Kitschelt Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koger Gregory, Masket Seth, and Noel Hans. 2009. “Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party Networks.” British Journal of Political Science 39(3): 633–53.
Lane Robert E. 1962. Political Ideology: Why the American Common Man Believes What He Does. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Layman Geoffrey C., Carsey Thomas M., and Horowitz Juliana Menasce. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83110.
Lelkes Yphtach, and Sniderman Paul M.. Forthcoming. “The Ideological Asymmetry of the American Party System.” British Journal of Political Science.
Lewis-Beck Michael S., Jacoby William G., Norpoth Helmut, and Weisberg Herbert F.. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Mann Thomas E., and Ornstein Norman J.. 2012a. It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.
Mann Thomas E., and Ornstein Norman J.. 2012b. “Let’s Just Say It: The Republicans Are the Problem.” Washington Post, April 27. http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/lets-just-say-it-the-republicans-are-the-problem/2012/04/27/gIQAxCVUlT_story.html, accessed October 20, 2014.
Masket Seth. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Mayhew David R. 1966. Party Loyalty among Congressmen: The Difference between Democrats and Republicans, 1947–1962. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mayhew David R. 1986. Placing Parties in American Politics: Organization, Electoral Settings, and Government Activity in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McCarty Nolan, Poole Keith T., and Rosenthal Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nexon David. 1971. “Asymmetry in the Political System: Occasional Activists in the Republican and Democratic Parties, 1956–1964.” American Political Science Review 65(3): 716–30.
Nicholson Stephen P., and Segura Gary M.. 2005. “Issue Agendas and the Politics of Latino Partisan Identification.” In Diversity in Democracy: Minority Representation in the United States, ed. Segura Gary M. and Bowler Shaun. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Noel Hans. 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parker Christopher S., and Barreto Matt A.. 2013. Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rucker Philip. 2009. “S.C. Senator Is a Voice of Reform Opposition.” Washington Post, July 28, A01.
Skocpol Theda, and Williamson Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Skrentny John D. 2004. The Minority Right Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Sowell Thomas. 1987. A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles. New York: William Morrow & Company.
Stettner Edward A. 1993. Shaping Modern Liberalism: Herbert Croly and Progressive Thought. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Vandehei Jim, Allen Mike, and Sherman Jake. 2013. “Double Trouble: House GOP Eyes Default, Shutdown.” Politico, January 13. http://politi.co/VmHVxp, accessed October 20, 2014.
Volkens Andrea, Lehmann Pola, Merz Nicolas, Regel Sven, and Werner Annika. 2013. Comparative Manifestos Project. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
Walker Jack L. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ware Alan. 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 54
Total number of PDF views: 268 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1807 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.