Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Is It Gender, Religiosity or Both? A Role Congruity Theory of Candidate Electability in Transitional Tunisia


Do voters regard male and female candidates equally? Does apparent religiosity of candidates help or hurt their electoral chances? Where biases exist, what explains them? We present a novel explanation of political bias, drawing from role congruity theory. It posits that political contexts shape citizens' perceptions of qualities that make a “capable leader,” which subsequently drives their willingness to vote for candidates. Evidence from a survey experiment embedded in the 2012 Tunisian Post-Election Survey demonstrates that this theory explains biases based on gender and religiosity better than dominant modernization and social identity theories. Moreover, these mechanisms are also likely to drive political biases related to other features and in other countries. This has important implications for policymakers aiming to reduce political biases in Tunisia, the MENA, or globally. It should encourage them to pay careful attention to stereotyped traits of underrepresented groups and successful leaders, and to use institutional solutions (e.g., electoral quotas) to shape expectations about underrepresented groups and leadership.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Kevin Arceneaux . 2001. “The ‘Gender Gap’ in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle an Old Question.” Political Research Quarterly 54(1): 143160.

Lori Beaman , Raghabendra Chattopadhyay , Esther Duflo , Rohini Pande , and Petia Topalova . 2009. “Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias?Journal of Quarterly Economics 124(4): 1497–540.

Lori Beaman , Rohini Pande , and Alexandra Cirone . 2012. “Politics as a Male Domain and Empowerment in India.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, ed. Susan Franceschet , Mona Lena Krook , and Jennifer M. Piscopo . New York: Oxford University Press.

Lindsay J Benstead . 2014a. “Effects of Interviewer-Respondent Gender Interaction on Attitudes toward Women and Politics: Findings from Morocco.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 26(3): 369383.

Lindsay J Benstead . 2014b. “Does Interviewer Dress Affect Survey Responses? Evidence from Morocco.” Politics & Religion. Available at, accessed October 12, 2014.

Marilynn B Brewer . 1979. “Ingroup Bias in the Minimal Intergroup Situation: A Cognitive-Motivational Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 86(March): 307–24.

Kathleen Dolan . 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 272–93.

Kathleen Dolan . 2004a. “The Impact of Candidate Sex on Evaluations of Candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Social Science Quarterly 85(1): 206–17.

Alice H. Eagly , and Steven J. Karau . 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109(3): 573–98.

Alice H. Eagly , Mona Makhijani , and Bruce G. Klonsky . 1992. “Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 112(3): 557–57.

Richard L. Fox , and Jennifer L. Lawless . 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48(2): 264–80.

Ellen D. B. Higgle , Penny M. Miller , Todd G. Shields , and Mitzi M. S. Johnson . 1997. “Gender Stereotypes and Decision Context in the Evaluation of Political Candidates.” Women & Politics 17(3): 6988.

Melanie M Hughes . 2013. “The Intersection of Gender and Minority Status in National Legislatures: The Minority Women Legislative Index.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38(4): 489516.

Ronald Inglehart , and Pippa Norris . 2003a. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jeffrey W Koch . 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations?Journal of Politics 62(2): 414–29.

Alison Konad , and Kathy Cannings . 1997. “The Effects of Gender Role Congruence and Statistical Discrimination on Managerial Advancement.” Human Relations 50(10): 1305–28.

Marianne La France , Marvin A. Hecht , Elizabeth Levy Paluck . 2003. “The Contingent Smile: A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Smiling.” Psychological Bulletin 129(2): 305–34.

Tarek Masoud . 2014. Counting Islam: Religion, Class and Election. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Corrine M. McConnaughy , Ismail K. White , David L. Leal , and Jason P. Casellas . 2010. “A Latino on the Ballot: Explaining Coethnic Voting among Latinos and the Response of White Americans.” Journal of Politics 72(4): 1199–211.

Monika L McDermott . 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 895918.

Monika L McDermott . 2007. “Voting for Catholic Candidates: The Evolution of a Stereotype.” Social Science Quarterly 88(4): 953–67.

Barbara Norrander and Clyde Wilcox . 2009. “The Gender Gap in Ideology.” Political Behavior 30(4): 503523.

Barbara A. Ritter , and Janice D. Yoder . 2004. “Gender Differences in Leader Emergence Persist Even for Dominant Women: An Updated Confirmation of Role Congruity Theory.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 28: 187–93.

Nowrin Tamanna . 2008Personal Status Laws in Morocco and Tunisia: A Comparative Exploration of the Possibilities for Equality-Enhancing Reform in Bangladesh.” Feminist Legal Studies 16(3): 323–43.

Mark Tessler , and Eleanor Gao . 2008. “Democracy and the Political Culture Orientations of Ordinary Citizens: A Typology for the Arab World and Beyond.” International Social Science Journal 59(192): 197207.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Benstead Supplementary Material

 Word (275 KB)
275 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 65 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 307 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.