Skip to main content Accessibility help

The More the Merrier? The Effects of Having Multiple International Election Monitoring Organizations

  • Judith Kelley (a1)

As the pressure to invite international election monitors rose at the end of the Cold War, states refused to grant the United Nations a dominant role. Thus, today multiple intergovernmental, regional, and international non-governmental organizations often monitor the same elections with equal authority. This article examines the costs and benefits of this complex regime to highlight some possible broader implications of regime complexity. It argues that the availability of many different organizations facilitates action that might otherwise have been blocked for political reasons. Furthermore, when different international election monitoring agencies agree, their consensus can bolster their individual legitimacy as well as the legitimacy of the international norms they stress, and thus magnify their influence on domestic politics. Unfortunately the election monitoring example also suggests that complex regimes can engender damaging inter-organizational politics and that the different biases, capabilities, and standards of organizations sometime can lead organizations to outright contradict each other or work at cross-purposes.

Hide All
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 1324.
Anglin, Douglas. 1995. International monitoring of the transition to democracy in South Africa, 1992–1994. African Affairs 94 (377): 519.
Balian, Hrair. 2001. Ten years of international election assistance and observation. Helsinki Monitor 12 (3): 197209.
Bjornlund, Eric. 2004. Beyond Free and Fair: Monitoring Elections and Building Democracy. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Johns Hopkins University Press.
Carothers, Thomas. 1997. The observers observed. Journal of Democracy 8 (3): 1731.
Cooley, Alexander, and Ron, James. 2002. The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. International Security 27 (1): 539.
Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly. 1998. Observation of Presidential Election in Azerbaijan (11 October 1998), Doc. 8256.
Dorman, Sara Rich. 2004. “Make Sure they Count Nicely this Time: The Politics of Election Observing in Zimbabwe.” Edinburgh Research Archive.
Geisler, Gisela. 1993. Fair? What has fairness got to do with it? Vagaries of election observations and democratic. Journal of Modern African Studies 31 (4): 613.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie. 2009. The power politics of regime complexity: Human rights trade conditionality in Europe. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 3337.
Kelley, Judith. 2008. Assessing the complex evolution of norms: the rise of international election monitoring. International Organization 62 (2): 221–55.
Kelley, Judith. Forthcoming. D minus elections: The politics and norms of international election monitoring. International Organization.
Organization of American States, General Assembly. 1990. Unit for the Promotion of Democracy.
Santa-Cruz, Arturo. 2005. Constitutional structures, sovereignty, and the emergence of norms: The case of international election monitoring. International Organization 59 (3): 663–93.
Throup, David, and Hornsby, Charles. 1998. Multi-Party Politics in Kenya: The Kenyatta & Moi States and the Triumph of the System in the 1992 Election. Athens: Ohio University Press.
United Nations. 2005. Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation and Code of Conduct for International Election Observers.
United Nations Development Programme. N.d. UNDP and Electoral Assistance: Ten Years of Experience: United Nations Development Programme.
“Zambia: OAU secretary-general endorses Mugabe's rejection of foreign observers.” 2002. BBC Monitoring Africa—Political Supplied by BBC Worldwide Monitoring, February 15.
“Zimbabwe; Group's Poll Report Biased, Racist.” 2002. Africa News, April 30.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed