Ritter, Alison Lancaster, Kari and Diprose, Rosalyn 2018. Improving drug policy: The potential of broader democratic participation. International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol. 55, p. 1.
Kasdin, Stuart 2018. Creating comity amidst gridlock: a corporatist repair for a broken congress. Policy Sciences,
Felicetti, Andrea 2018. Non-deliberative politics in deliberative democracy: distinct approaches for different actors. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, Vol. 48, Issue. 01, p. 1.
Jacquet, Vincent and Reuchamps, Min 2018. Who wants to pay for deliberative democracy? The crowdfunders of the G1000 in Belgium. European Political Science Review, Vol. 10, Issue. 01, p. 29.
Tam, Chui-Ling 2018. Notes on a caribou hearing: Spatial marginalization through participatory democracy in western Nunavut. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien,
Baume, Sandrine and Papadopoulos, Yannis 2018. Transparency: from Bentham’s inventory of virtuous effects to contemporary evidence-based scepticism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 169.
Leston-Bandeira, Cristina and Thompson, Louise 2017. Integrating the view of the public into the formal legislative process: public reading stage in the UK House of Commons. The Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol. 23, Issue. 4, p. 508.
García-Espín, Patricia and Ganuza, Ernesto 2017. Participatory Skepticism: Ambivalence and Conflict in Popular Discourses of Participatory Democracy. Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 40, Issue. 4, p. 425.
Leighley, Jan E. and Oser, Jennifer 2017. Representation in an Era of Political and Economic Inequality: How and When Citizen Engagement Matters. Perspectives on Politics, p. 1.
Christensen, Henrik Serup Himmelroos, Staffan and Grönlund, Kimmo 2017. Does Deliberation Breed an Appetite for Discursive Participation? Assessing the Impact of First-Hand Experience. Political Studies, Vol. 65, Issue. 1_suppl, p. 64.
Heidelberg, Roy L. 2017. Political Accountability and Spaces of Contestation. Administration & Society, Vol. 49, Issue. 10, p. 1379.
Holdo, Markus 2017. The Virtuous, the Critical and the Trustworthy: Citizen Ideals and Forms of Democratic Participation. Scandinavian Political Studies,
Hudson, Alexander 2017. When Does Public Participation Make a Difference? Evidence From Iceland's Crowdsourced Constitution. Policy & Internet,
Christensen, Johan and Holst, Cathrine 2017. Advisory commissions, academic expertise and democratic legitimacy: the case of Norway. Science and Public Policy, Vol. 44, Issue. 6, p. 821.
Oser, Jennifer 2017. Assessing How Participators Combine Acts in Their “Political Tool Kits”: A Person-Centered Measurement Approach for Analyzing Citizen Participation. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 133, Issue. 1, p. 235.
TOUCHTON, MICHAEL SUGIYAMA, NATASHA BORGES and WAMPLER, BRIAN 2017. Democracy at Work: Moving Beyond Elections to Improve Well-Being. American Political Science Review, Vol. 111, Issue. 01, p. 68.
Over the past two decades we have heard an historically unprecedented volume of talk about and praise of democracy, and many governmental, non-governmental, and international organizations have been engaged in democracy promotion. Democracy is a subject that crosses the boundaries in political science, and within my own field of political theory there has been a major revival of democratic theory. In political theory, argument about “democracy” is usually now qualified by one of an array of adjectives, which include cosmopolitan, agonistic, republican, and monitory. But the new form that has been by far the most successful is deliberative democracy. By 2007 John Dryzek could write that “deliberative democracy now constitutes the most active area of political theory in its entirety (not just democratic theory).” Not only is there an extremely large and rapidly growing literature, both theoretical and empirical, on deliberative democracy, but its influence has spread far outside universities.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.