Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Press Room Predictions

  • Linda Greenhouse (a1)
Abstract

Scrolling through the results of the Supreme Court Forecasting Project in July 2003, I regarded nearly every prediction as within the realm of plausibility until I reached the statistical model's forecast of the outcome in Lawrence v. Texas, the gay rights case. The model predicted that the Supreme Court would affirm by a 5–4 vote the judgment of the Texas Court of Appeals that the state's law criminalizing gay sex was constitutional. This was such a gaffe that it led me to question whether all the fancy modeling was worth the effort. (Two of the three experts correctly predicted a 6–3 reversal; the third made the same mistake as the model.)For her coverage of the Court, Linda Greenhouse was awarded a Pulitzer Prize in journalism in 1998. In 2002 the American Political Science Association presented her with its Carey McWilliams Award “for a major journalistic contribution to our understanding of politics.”

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Fisher, R. A.1935. The logic of inductive inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society98 (1): 3954.

Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and Society Review9 (1): 95160.

Martin, Andrew D., and Kevin M.Quinn. 2002. Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis10 (2): 13453.

McGuire, Kevin, and BarbaraPalmer. 1995. Issue fluidity on the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review89 (3): 691702.

Meirowitz, Adam, and Joshua A.Tucker. 2004. Learning from terrorism markets. Perspectives on Politics2 (2): 33136.

Poole, Keith T., and HowardRosenthal. 1991. Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science35 (1): 22878.

Ruger, Theodore W., Pauline T.Kim, Andrew D.Martin, and Kevin M.Quinn. 2004. The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and political science approaches to predicting Supreme Court decisionmaking. Columbia Law Review104 (4): 11501209.

Sherry, Suzanna. 1986. Civic virtue and the feminine voice in constitutional adjudication. Virginia Law Review72 (April): 543616.

Sherry, Suzanna2003. The unmaking of a precedent. Supreme Court Review2003:23167.

Silbey, Susan S.1997. Let them eat cake: Globalization, postmodern colonialism and the possibilities of justice. Law & Society Review31 (2): 20735.

Simon, Jonathan. 1988. Ideological effects of actuarial practices. Law & Society Review22 (4): 771800.

Sirovich, Lawrence. 2003. A pattern analysis of the second Rehnquist U.S. Supreme Court. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/10.1073/pnas.1132164100.

Smith, A. D.1990. Toward a global culture?Theory, culture and society7 (2–3): 17191.

Wasby, Stephen, AnthonyD'Amato, and RosemaryMetrailer. 1976. The functions of oral argument in the U.S. Supreme Court. Quarterly Journal of Speech62 (4): 41022.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 89 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.