Skip to main content Accessibility help

A Realist Foreign Policy for the United States

  • Sebastian Rosato (a1) and John Schuessler (a2)


What kind of policy can the United States pursue that ensures its security while minimizing the likelihood of war? We describe and defend a realist theory of foreign policy to guide American decision makers. Briefly, the theory says that if they want to ensure their security, great powers such as the United States should balance against other great powers. They should also take a relaxed view toward developments involving minor powers and, at most, should balance against hostile minor powers that inhabit strategically important regions of the world. We then show that had the great powers followed our theory's prescriptions, some of the most important wars of the past century might have been averted. Specifically, the world wars might not have occurred, and the United States might not have gone to war in either Vietnam or Iraq. In other words, realism as we conceive it offers the prospect of security without war. At the same time, we also argue that if the United States adopts an alternative liberal foreign policy, this is likely to result in more, rather than fewer, wars. We conclude by offering some theoretically-based proposals about how US decision makers should deal with China and Iran.



Hide All
Arreguin-Toft, Ivan. 2001. “How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict.” International Security 26(1): 93128.
Art, Robert J. et al. 2002. “War with Iraq Is Not in America's National Interest.” New York Times, paid advertisement, September 26. (, accessed June 6, 2011.
Ashley, Richard K. 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism.” International Organization 38(2): 225–86.
Barkin, Samuel. 2009. “Realism, Prediction, and Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy Analysis 5(3): 233–46.
Bell, P.M.H. 1986. The Origins of the Second World War in Europe. London: Longman.
Betts, Richard K. 2003. “Striking First: A History of Thankfully Lost Opportunities.” Ethics and International Affairs 17(1): 1724.
Biddle, Stephen D. 2004. Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brooks, Stephen G. 1997. “Dueling Realisms.” International Organization 51(3): 445–77.
Carr, Edward H. 1946. The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939. London: Macmillan.
Christensen, Thomas J. 2006. “The Rise of China and U.S. Policy toward East Asia: Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster?International Security 31(1): 81126.
Christensen, Thomas J., and Snyder, Jack. 1990. “Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolarity.” International Organization 44(2): 137–68.
Coogan, John W., and Coogan, Peter F.. 1985. “The British Cabinet and the Anglo-French Staff Talks, 1905–1914: Who Knew What and When Did He Know It?Journal of British Studies 24(1): 110–31.
Copeland, Dale C. 2000. The Origins of Major War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Correlates of War. 2005. National Material Capabilities Data. (, accessed June 6, 2011.
Correlates of War. 2011. Inter-State War Data Set. (, accessed June 6, 2011.
Dallek, Robert. 1979. Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932–1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Desch, Michael C. 1989. “The Keys that Lock Up the World: Identifying American Interests in the Periphery.” International Security 14(1): 86121.
Desch, Michael C. 2003. “It Is Kind to Be Cruel: The Humanity of American Realism.” Review of International Studies 29(3): 415–26.
Desch, Michael C. 2007/08. “America's Liberal Illiberalism: The Ideological Origins of Overreaction in U.S. Foreign Policy.” International Security 32(3): 743.
Doyle, Michael W. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12(4): 323–53.
Edelman, Eric S., Krepinevich, Andrew F., and Montgomery, Evan B.. 2011. “The Dangers of a Nuclear Iran: The Limits of Containment.” Foreign Affairs 90(1): 6681.
Elman, Colin. 1996. “Horses For Courses: Why Not Neorealist Theories of Foreign Policy?Security Studies 6(1): 753.
Fearon, James D. 1991. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science.” World Politics 43(2): 169–95.
Ferguson, Niall. 1998. The Pity of War. New York: Basic Books.
Flibbert, Andrew. 2006. “The Road to Baghdad: Ideas and Intellectuals in Explanations of the Iraq War.” Security Studies 15(2): 310–52.
Friedberg, Aaron L. 2005. “The Future of U.S.-China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?International Security 30(2): 745.
Gershkoff, Amy, and Kushner, Shana. 2005. “Shaping Public Opinion: The 9/11—Iraq Connection In the Bush Administration's Rhetoric.” Perspectives on Politics 3(3): 525–37.
Gilpin, Robert. 1984. “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism.” International Organization 38(2): 287304.
Gilpin, Robert. 1996. “No One Loves a Political Realist.” Security Studies 5(1): 326.
Glaser, Charles. 1994/95. “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help.” International Security 19(3): 5090.
Glaser, Charles. 2010. Rational Theory of International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Glaser, Charles. 2011. “Will China's Rise Lead to War?Foreign Affairs 90(2): 8091.
Hess, Gary R. 2009. Vietnam: Explaining America's Lost War. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ikenberry, G. John. 2009. “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order.” Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 7187.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, and Kaufman, Stuart J.. 2007. “Security Scholars for a Sensible Foreign Policy: A Study in Weberian Activism.” Perspectives on Politics 5(1): 95103.
Jentleson, Bruce W., and Ratner, Ely. 2011. “Bridging the Beltway-Ivory Tower Gap.” International Studies Review 13(1): 611.
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jervis, Robert. 1978. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30(2): 167214.
Jervis, Robert. 1989. The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Jervis, Robert. 1994. “Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Study of International Politics.” Social Research 61(4): 853–77.
Jervis, Robert. 2003. “Understanding the Bush Doctrine.” Political Science Quarterly 118(3): 365–88.
Keiger, John F.V. 1983. France and the Origins of the First World War. New York: St. Martin's.
Kennan, George. 1951. American Diplomacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. “Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond.” In Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Keohane, Robert O.. New York: Columbia University Press.
Keohane, Robert O., and Martin, Lisa L.. 1995. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security 20(1): 3951.
Kirshner, Jonathan. 2010. “The Tragedy of Offensive Realism: Classical Realism and the Rise of China.” European Journal of International Relations. Published online before print as doi:10.1177/1354066110373949.
Labs, Eric J. 1992. “Do Weak States Bandwagon?Security Studies 1(3): 383416.
Layne, Christopher. 1994. “Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace.” International Security 19(2): 549.
Layne, Christopher. 2006. The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Layne, Christopher. 2008. “Security Studies and the Use of History: Neville Chamberlain's Grand Strategy Revisited.” Security Studies 17(3): 397437.
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, Jack S. 1987. “Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War.” World Politics 40(1): 82107.
Levy, Jack S. 1991. “Preferences, Constraints, and Choices in July 1914.” In Military Strategy and the Origins of the First World War, ed. Miller, Steven E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Van Evera, Stephen. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lieber, Keir A. 2007. “The New History of World War I and What It Means for International Relations Theory.” International Security 32(2): 155–91.
Lieven, D.C.B. 1983. Russia and the Origins of the First World War. New York: St. Martin's.
Lindsay, James, and Takeyh, Ray. 2010. “After Iran Gets the Bomb: How Washington Can Limit the Damage from Iran's Nuclear Defiance.” Foreign Affairs 89(2): 3349.
Lyall, Jason, and Wilson, Isaiah. 2009. “Rage Against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars.” International Organization 63(1): 67106.
Lynn-Jones, Sean M. 1991. “Détente and Deterrence: Anglo German Relations, 1911–1914.” In Military Strategy and the Origins of the First World War, ed. Miller, Steven E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Van Evera, Stephen. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E.. 1995. “Preface.” In The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security, ed. Brown, Michael E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mack, Andrew. 1975. “Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict.” World Politics 27(2): 175200.
Maliniak, Daniel, Oakes, Amy, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael. 2009. “Inside the Ivory Tower.” Foreign Policy 117: 8486.
Maoz, Zeev. 1989. “Power, Capabilities, and Paradoxical Conflict Outcomes.” World Politics 41(2): 239–66.
Mearsheimer, John J. 1983. Conventional Deterrence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War.” International Security 15(4): 556.
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994/95. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19(3): 549.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2002. “Liberal Talk, Realist Thinking.” University of Chicago Magazine. (, accessed June 6, 2011.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2011. “Imperial by Design.” The National Interest 111: 1634.
Mearsheimer, John J., and Walt, Stephen M.. 2003a. “An Unnecessary War.” Foreign Policy 134: 5059.
Mearsheimer, John J., and Walt, Stephen M.. 2003b. “Keeping Saddam Hussein in a Box.” New York Times (February 2): A15.
Mill, John Stuart. 1993. Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government. London: Everyman.
Montgomery, Evan B. 2006. “Breaking Out of the Security Dilemma: Realism, Reassurance, and the Problem of Uncertainty.” International Security 31(2): 151–85.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1965. “We Are Deluding Ourselves in Vietnam.” New York Times Magazine (April 18). (, accessed June 6, 2011.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1993. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Revised by Thompson, Kenneth W.. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Morris, Roger, and Lake, Anthony. 1971. “The Human Reality of Realpolitik.” Foreign Policy 4: 157–62.
Moyar, Mark. 2006. Triumph Forsaken: The Vietnam War, 1954–1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mueller, John. 2005. “The Iraq Syndrome.” Foreign Affairs 84(6): 4454.
Narizny, Kevin. 2003a. “The Political Economy of Alignment: Great Britain's Commitments to Europe, 1905–1939.” International Security 27(4): 184219.
Narizny, Kevin. 2003b. “Both Guns and Butter, or Neither. Class Interests in the Political Economy of Rearmament.” American Political Science Review 97(2): 203–20.
Narizny, Kevin. 2007. The Political Economy of Grand Strategy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Newsom, David D. 1995–1996. “Foreign Policy and Academia.” Foreign Policy 101: 5267.
Nye, Joseph. 2009. “Scholars on the Sidelines.” Washington Post (April 13): A15.
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Oneal, John R., and Russett, Bruce. 1999. “The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” World Politics 52(1): 137.
Oren, Ido. 2009. “The Unrealism of Contemporary Realism: The Tension between Realist Theory and Realists' Practice.” Perspectives on Politics 7(2): 283301.
Payne, Rodger A. 2007. “Neorealists as Critical Theorists: The Purpose of Foreign Policy Debate.” Perspectives on Politics 5(3): 503–14.
Posen, Barry R. 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Posen, Barry R. 2006a. “We Can Live with a Nuclear Iran.” New York Times (February 27). (, accessed June 6, 2011.
Posen, Barry R. 2006b. “A Nuclear-Armed Iran: A Difficult but Not Impossible Policy Problem: A Century Foundation Report.” New York: Century Foundation.
Posen, Barry R. 2007. “The Case for Restraint.” American Interest 3(1): 717.
Rathbun, Brian C. 2008. “A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Natural and Necessary Extension of Neorealism.” Security Studies 17(2): 128.
Record, Jeffrey. 1998. The Wrong War: Why We Lost in Vietnam. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
Resnick, Evan. 2009. “Correspondence: Debating British Decision-Making toward Nazi Germany in the 1930s.” International Security 34(1): 182–88.
Ripsman, Norrin M., and Levy, Jack S.. 2008. “Buying Time: A Reinterpretation of British Appeasement in the 1930s.” International Security 33(2): 148–81.
Rosato, Sebastian. 2003. “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 585602.
Rose, Gideon. 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics 51(1): 144–72.
Russett, Bruce M. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Russett, Bruce M., and Oneal, John R.. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: W. W. Norton.
Russett, Bruce M., Oneal, John R., and Davis, David. 1998. “The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–1985.” International Organization 52(3): 441–67.
Sagan, Scott D. 1991. “1914 Revisited: Allies, Offense, and Instability.” In Military Strategy and the Origins of the First World War, ed. Miller, Steven E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Van Evera, Stephen. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schmidt, Brian C., and Williams, Michael C.. 2008. “The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists.” Security Studies 17(2): 191220.
Schuessler, John M. 2010. “The Deception Dividend: FDR's Undeclared War.” International Security 34(4): 133–65.
Schweller, Randall L. 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In.” International Security 19(1): 72107.
Schweller, Randall L. 2006. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shanker, Thom. 2011. “Warning Against Wars Like Iran and Afghanistan.” New York Times (February 25). (, accessed June 6, 2011.
Sigelman, Lee. 2006. “The Coevolution of American Political Science and the American Political Science Review.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 463–78.
Slater, Jerome. 1993/94. “The Domino Theory and International Politics: The Case of Vietnam.” Security Studies 3(2): 186224.
Snyder, Jack L. 1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Steiner, Zara S. 1977. Britain and the Origins of the First World War. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Talmadge, Caitlin. 2008. “Closing Time: Assessing the Iranian Threat to the Strait of Hormuz.” International Security 33(1): 82117.
Taylor, A.J.P. 1954. The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trachtenberg, Marc. 1991. “The Meaning of Mobilization in 1914.” In Military Strategy and the Origins of the First World War, ed. Miller, Steven E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Van Evera, Stephen. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Trachtenberg, Marc. 1996. “Review of Paul W. Schroeder The Transformation of European Politics: 1763–1848.” Orbis 40(1): 158–64.
Trachtenberg, Marc. 2003. “The Question of Realism: An Historian's View.” Security Studies 13(1): 156–94.
Van Evera, Stephen. 1990. “Why Europe Matters, Why the Third World Doesn't: American Grand Strategy after the Cold War.” Journal of Strategic Studies 13(2): 151.
Van Evera, Stephen. 1999. Causes of War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Vegetius Renatus, Publius Flavius. 1995. De re militari, ed. Onnerfors, Alf. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Walt, Stephen M. 1989. “The Case for Finite Containment: Analyzing U.S. Grand Strategy.” International Security 14(1): 549.
Walt, Stephen M. 1991. “The Renaissance of Security Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 35(2): 211–39.
Walt, Stephen M. 2005a. “The Relationship Between Theory and Policy in International Relations.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 2348.
Walt, Stephen M. 2005b. Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy. New York: W. W. Norton.
Walt, Stephen M. 2009. “Alliances in a Unipolar World.” World Politics 61(1): 86120.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1967. “The Politics of Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 11(3): 199211.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1986. “A Response to My Critics.” In Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Keohane, Robert O.. New York: Columbia University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1988. “The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18(4): 615–28.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1990. “Nuclear Myths and Political Realities.” American Political Science Review 84(3): 731–45.
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391425.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Michael C. 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, Samuel R., and May, Ernest R.. 2007. “An Identity of Opinion: Historians and July 1914.” Journal of Modern History 79(2): 335–87.
Wilson, Keith M. 1981. “British Power in the European Balance, 1906–1914.” In Retreat from Power: Studies in Britain's Foreign Policy of the Twentieth Century, vol. 1, 1906–1939, ed. Dilks, David. London: Macmillan.

A Realist Foreign Policy for the United States

  • Sebastian Rosato (a1) and John Schuessler (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed