Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Realist Tradition in American Public Opinion

  • Daniel W. Drezner (a1)

For more than half a century, realist scholars of international relations have maintained that their world view is inimical to the American public. For a variety of reasons—inchoate attitudes, national history, American exceptionalism—realists assert that the U.S. government pursues realist policies in spite and not because of public opinion. Indeed, most IR scholars share this “anti-realist assumption.” To determine the empirical validity of the anti-realist assumption, this paper re-examines survey and experimental data on the mass public's attitudes towards foreign policy priorities and world views, the use of force, and foreign economic policy over the past three decades. The results suggest that, far from disliking realism, Americans are at least as comfortable with the logic of realpolitik as they are with liberal internationalism. The persistence of the anti-realist assumption might be due to an ironic fact: American elites are more predisposed towards liberal internationalism than the rest of the American public.Daniel W. Drezner is Associate Professor of International Politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University ( Previous versions of this paper were presented at the 2007 International Studies Association meeting in Chicago, IL, and at Yale University's Institution for Social and Policy Studies. He is grateful to Bethany Albertson, John Brehm, Joshua Busby, Jon Caverley, Richard Eichenberg, Benjamin Fordham, Nikolas Gvosdev, Don Green, Jacob Hacker, Lawrence Kaplan, Andrew Moravcsik, John Mearsheimer, Gideon Rose, Bruce Russett, Gregory Sanders, Stephen Teles, and John Schuessler for their comments and suggestions. Luisa Melo performed valuable research assistance, and the German Marshall Fund of the United States provided generous support during the drafting of this paper.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Almond, Gabriel. 1956. Public opinion and national security. Public Opinion Quarterly 20 (2): 37178.

Art, Robert. 1998/99. Geopolitics Updated: The Strategy of Selective Engagement. International Security 23 (1): 79113.

Boettcher, William, and Michael Cobb. 2006. Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty framing and public perceptions of success and failure in Iraq. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (December): 83154.

Brewer, Paul. 2004. Public trust in (or cynicism about) other nations across time. Political Behavior 26 (December): 31740.

Brewer, Paul. 2006. National interest frames and public opinion about world affairs. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 11 (4): 89102.

Brewer, Paul, et al. 2004. International trust and public opinion about world affairs. American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 93109.

Brewer, Paul, Sean Aday, and Kimberly Gross. 2005. Do Americans trust other nations? A panel study. Social Science Quarterly 86 (March): 3651.

Brooks, Stephen. 1997. Dueling realisms. International Organization 51 (3): 44577.

Buzan, Barry. 1984. Economic structure and international security. International Organization 38 (4): 597624.

Chittick, William, Keith Billingsley, and Rick Travis. 1995. A three-dimensional model of American foreign policy beliefs. International Studies Quarterly 39 (3): 31331.

Christensen, Thomas J., and Jack Snyder. 1990. Chain gangs and passed bucks: Predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity. International Organization 44 (2): 13768.

Citrin, Jack, Ernst B. Haas, Christopher Muste, and Beth Reingold. 1994. Is American nationalism changing? Implications for foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly 38 (1): 131.

Druckman, James. 2001. The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior 23 (3): 22556

Eichenberg, Richard. 2005. Victory has many friends: U.S. public opinion and the use of force, 1981–2005. International Security 30 (Summer): 14077.

Everts, Philip, and Pierangelo Isernia. 2005. The war in Iraq. Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (Summer): 264323.

Gelpi, Christopher, and John Mueller. 2006. The costs of war. Foreign Affairs 85 (1): 13944.

Gholz, Eugene, Daryl G. Press, and Harvey M. Sapolsky. 1997. Come home, America: The strategy of restraint in the face of temptation. International Security 21 (1): 548.

Gilboa, Eytan. 2005. The CNN effect. Political Comunication 22 (1): 2744.

Gilpin, Robert. 1996. No one loves a political realist. Security Studies 5 (Spring): 328.

Gowa, Joanne. 1986. Anarchy, egoism, and third images. International Organization 40 (2): 16786.

Herrmann, Richard, and Jonathan Keller. 2004. Beliefs, values, and strategic choice. Journal of Politics 66 (May): 55780.

Herrmann, Richard, Philip Tetlock, and Matthew Diascro. 2001. How Americans think about trade. International Studies Quarterly 45 (1): 191218.

Herrmann, Richard, Philip Tetlock, and Penny Visser. 1999. Mass public decisions to go to war: A cognitive-interactionist framework. American Political Science Review 93 (3): 55373.

Hiscox, Michael. 2006. Through a glass and darkly: Attitudes toward international trade and the curious effects of issue framing. International Organization 60 (July): 75580.

Holsti, Ole. 1992. Public opinion and foreign policy: Challenging the Almond-Lippmann consensus. International Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 43966.

Hurwitz, Jon, and Mark Peffley. 1987. How are foreign policy attitudes structured? American Political Science Review 81 (4): 110020.

Jacobs, Lawrence, and Benjamin Page. 2005. Who influences U.S. foreign policy? American Political Science Review 99 (1): 10723.

Jackson, Patrick T., and Stuart Kaufman. 2007. Security scholars for a sensible foreign policy: A study in Weberian activism. Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 95103.

Jenkins-Smith, Hank, and Kerry Herron. 2005. United States public responses to terrorism. Review of Policy Research 22 (6): 599623.

Jentleson, Bruce. 1992. The pretty prudent public: Post-Vietnam American opinion and the use of military force. International Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 4974.

Jentleson, Bruce, and Rebecca Britton. 1998. Still pretty prudent: Post-Cold War American public opinion on the use of military force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (4): 395417.

Kaufmann, Chaim. 2004. Threat inflation and the failure of the marketplace of ideas. International Security 29 (Summer): 548.

Klarevas, Louis. 2002. The “essential domino” of military operations: American public opinion and the use of force. International Studies Perspectives 3 (4): 41737.

Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier. World Politics 43 (3): 33666.

Layne, Christopher. 1997. From preponderance to offshore balancing. International Security 22 (1): 86124.

Legro, Jeffrey, and Andrew Moravcsik. 1999. Is anyone still a realist? International Security 24 (3): 55106.

Lepgold, Joseph, and Timothy McKeown. 1995. Is American foreign policy exceptional? Political Science Quarterly 110 (3): 36984.

Mandelbaum, Michael. 1996. Foreign policy as social work. Foreign Affairs 75 (January/February): 1632.

McFarland, Sam, and Melissa Matthews. 2005a. Who cares about human rights? Political Psychology 26 (June): 36585.

McFarland, Sam, and Melissa Matthews. 2005b. Do Americans care about human rights? Journal of Human Rights 4 (3): 30520.

Mearsheimer, John, and Stephen Walt. 2006. The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy. Middle East Policy 13 (3): 2987.

Mermin, Jonathan. 1997. Television news and American intervention in Somalia: The myth of a media-driven foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly 112 (3): 385403.

Monten, Jonathan. 2005. The roots of the Bush doctrine. International Security 29 (Spring): 11256.

Mueller, John. 2005. The Iraq syndrome. Foreign Affairs 84 (6): 4554.

Nincic, Miroslav. 1992. A sensible public: New perspectives on popular opinion and foreign policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (4): 77289.

Oneal, John, Brad Lian, and James Joyner. 1996. Are the American people “pretty prudent”? Public responses to U.S. uses of force, 1950–1988. International Studies Quarterly 40 (2): 26179.

Page, Benjamin, and Jason Barabas. 2000. Foreign policy gaps between citizens and leaders. International Studies Quarterly 44 (3): 33964.

Powlick, Philip J., and Andrew Z. Katz. 1998. Defining the American public opinion/foreign policy nexus. Mershon International Studies Review 42 (May): 2961.

Robinson, Piers. 1999. The CNN effect: Can the news media drive foreign policy? Review of International Studies 25 (2): 30109.

Rose, Gideon. 1998. Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics 51 (1): 14472.

Rousseau, David. 2002. Motivations for choice: The salience of relative gains in international politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (3): 394426.

Ruggie, John Gerard. 1997. The past as prologue? Interests, identity, and American foreign policy. International Security 21 (2): 89125.

Scheve, Kenneth F., and Matthew Slaughter. 2004. Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production. American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 66274.

Schildkraut, Deborah J. 2002. The more things change … American identity and mass and elite responses to 9/11. Political Psychology 23 (3): 51135.

Schweller, Randall. 2004. Unanswered threats: A neoclassical realist theory of underbalancing. International Security 29 (Fall): 159201.

Todorov, Alexander, and Anesu Mandisodza. 2004. Public opinion on foreign policy. Public Opinion Quarterly 68 (Fall): 32348.

Walker, Thomas, and Jeffrey Morton. 2005. Reassessing the “power of power politics” thesis: Is realism still dominant? International Studies Review 7 (June): 34156.

Western, Jon. 2005. The war over Iraq: Selling war to the American public. Security Studies 14 (1): 10639.

Woods, Kevin, James Lacey, and Williamson Murray. 2006. Saddam's delusions: The view from the inside. Foreign Affairs 85 (3): 226.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 51
Total number of PDF views: 212 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 871 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.