Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Relative Policy Support and Coincidental Representation

  • Peter K. Enns
Abstract

The finding that the preferences of middle-income Americans are ignored when they diverge from the preferences of the rich is one of the most widely accepted and influential conclusions in political science research today. I offer a cautionary note regarding this conclusion. I demonstrate that even on those issues for which the preferences of the wealthy and those in the middle diverge, policy ends up about where we would expect if policymakers represented the middle class and ignored the affluent. This result emerges because even when middle- and high-income groups express different levels of support for a policy (i.e., a preference gap exists), the policies that receive the most (least) support among the middle typically receive the most (least) support among the affluent (i.e., relative policy support is often equivalent). As a result, the opportunity of unequal representation of the “average citizen” is much less than previously thought. The analysis also shows, however, that substantial opportunity exists for unequal representation of strong partisan preferences. Together, these results reinforce the importance of party identification for understanding policy outcomes and who gets represented.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abrajano, Marisa and Poole, Keith T.. 2011. “Assessing the Ethnic and Racial Diversity of American Public Opinion.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bernstein, Jared. 2014. “A Model of American Inequality, Opportunity, and Political Power.” In Working and Living in the Shadow of Economic Fragility., ed. Crain, Marion and Sherraden, Michael. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bhatti, Yosef and Erikson, Robert S.. 2011. “How Poorly are the Poor Represented in the U.S. Senate?” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Bonica, Adam, McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2013. “Why Hasn't Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(3): 103–24.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., De Boef, Suzanna, and Lin, Tse-Min. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” American Political Science Review 98(3): 515–28.
Citrin, Jack and Green, Donald Philip. 1990. “The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion.” In Research in Micropolitics, vol. 3, ed. Long, Samuel. Greenwich: JAI Press.
Delli, Carpini, Michael, X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Disch, Lisa. 2012. “Democratic Representation and the Constituency Paradox.” Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 599616.
Domhoff, G. William. 2002. “The Power Elite, Public Policy, and Public Opinion.” In Navigating Public Opinion, ed. Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Page, Benjamin. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Druckman, James N. and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2011. “Segmented Representation: The Reagan White House and Disproportionate Responsiveness.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Ellis, Christopher R., Daniel Ura, Joseph, and Robinson, Jenna Ashley. 2006. “The Dynamic Consequences of Nonvoting in American National Elections.” Political Research Quarterly. 59(2): 227–33.
Enns, Peter K. and Kellstedt, Paul M.. 2008. “Policy Mood and Political Sophistication: Why Everybody Moves Mood.” British Journal of Political Science 38(3): 433–54.
Enns, Peter K. Kelly, Nathan J., Morgan, Jana, Volscho, Thomas and Witko, Christopher. 2014. “Conditional Status Quo Bias and Top Income Shares: How U.S. Political Institutions Have Benefited the Rich.” Journal of Politics 76(2): 289303.
Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2011. “Group Opinion and the Study of Representation.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Erikson, Robert S., , Michael MacKuen, B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ferguson, Thomas. 1995. Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Franko, William, Tolbert, Caroline J., and Witko, Christopher. 2013. “Inequality, Self-Interest, and Public Support for ‘Robin Hood’ Tax Policies.” Political Research Quarterly 66(4): 923–37.
Gaventa, John. 1982. Power and Powerlessness. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5) :778–96.
Gilens, Martin. 2009. “Preference Gaps and Inequality in Representation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42(2): 335–41.
Gilens, Martin. 2011. “Policy Consequences of Representational Inequality.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
Gilens, Martin and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives Politics 12(3): 564–81.
Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2005. “Abandoning the Middle: The Bush Tax Cuts and the Limits of Democratic Control.” Perspectives on Politics 3(1): 3353.
Heith, Diane J. 1998. “Staffing the White House Public Opinion Apparatus 1969–1988.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62(2): 165–89.
Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 619–31.
Hochschild, Jennifer. 1979. “Why the Dog Doesn't Bark: Income, Attitudes, and the Redistribution of Wealth.” Polity 11: 478511.
Hochschild, Jennifer. 1981. What's Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Page, Benjamin I.. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?American Political Science Review 99(1): 107–24.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1994. “Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming: The Use of Private Polls in Kennedy's 1960 Presidential Campaign.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 527–40.
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1995. “The Rise of Presidential Polling: The Nixon White House in Historical Perspective.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59(2): 163–95.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Skocpol, Theda. 2005. “American Democracy in an Era of Rising Inequality.” In Inequality and American Democracy, ed. Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Skocpol, Theda. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Jacobson, Gary C. 2012. “The Electoral Origins of Polarized Politics: Evidence from the 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” American Behavioral Scientist 56(12): 1612–30.
Jacoby, William G. 2014 “Is There a Culture War? Conflicting Value Structures in American Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 108(4): 754–71.
Kaufmann, Karen M. and Petrocik, John R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 864–87.
Kelly, Nathan J. and Enns, Peter K.. 2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-Reinforcing Link between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 54(4): 855–70.
Kinder, Donald R. and Sanders, Lynn M.. 1996. Divided by Color. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lau, Richard R. and Heldman, Caroline. 2009. “Self-Interest, Symbolic Attitudes, and Support for Public Policy.” Political Psychology 30(4): 513–37.
Leighley, Jan E. and Nagler, Jonathan. 2014. Who Votes Now? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lupu, Noam and Pontusson, Jonas. 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 105(2): 316–36.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1990. “Preface.” In Beyond Self-Interest, ed. Mansbridge, Jane J.. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–28.
Monroe, Alan. 1979. “Consistency between Constituency Preferences and National Policy Decisions.” American Politics Quarterly 12: 319.
O'Brien, Steven, McGuire, Paula, McPherson, James M., and Gerstle, Gary. 1991. American Political Leaders: From Colonial Times to the Present. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77(1): 175–90.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rhodes, Jesse H. and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2013. “Economic Inequality and Representation in the U.S. House: A New Approach Using Population-Level Data.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 2013.
Rigby, Elizabeth and Wright, Gerald C.. 2011. “Whose Statehouse Democracy? Policy Responsiveness to Poor versus Rich Constituents in Poor versus Rich States.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Sears, David O. and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1990. “The Limited Effect of Economic Self-interest on the Political Attitudes of the Mass Public.” Journal of Behavioral Economics 19: 247–71.
Shapiro, Robert Y. and Young, John M.. 1986. “The Polls: Medical Care in the United States.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 418–28.
Sombart, Werner. 1976 [1906]. Why There Is No Socialism in the United States. New York: Sharpe.
Soroka, Stuart N. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2008. “On the Limits to Inequality in Representation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41(2) :319–27.
Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–65.
Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Winters, Jeffrey A. and Page, Benjamin I.. 2009. “Oligarchy in the United States?” Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 731–51.
Wlezien, Christopher and Soroka, Stuart. 2011. “Inequality in Policy Responsiveness?” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter K. and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Enns supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (460 KB)
460 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 37
Total number of PDF views: 485 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2399 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.