Skip to main content
×
Home

Relative Policy Support and Coincidental Representation

Abstract

The finding that the preferences of middle-income Americans are ignored when they diverge from the preferences of the rich is one of the most widely accepted and influential conclusions in political science research today. I offer a cautionary note regarding this conclusion. I demonstrate that even on those issues for which the preferences of the wealthy and those in the middle diverge, policy ends up about where we would expect if policymakers represented the middle class and ignored the affluent. This result emerges because even when middle- and high-income groups express different levels of support for a policy (i.e., a preference gap exists), the policies that receive the most (least) support among the middle typically receive the most (least) support among the affluent (i.e., relative policy support is often equivalent). As a result, the opportunity of unequal representation of the “average citizen” is much less than previously thought. The analysis also shows, however, that substantial opportunity exists for unequal representation of strong partisan preferences. Together, these results reinforce the importance of party identification for understanding policy outcomes and who gets represented.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abrajano Marisa and Poole Keith T.. 2011. “Assessing the Ethnic and Racial Diversity of American Public Opinion.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns Peter K. and Wlezien Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Abramowitz Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Althaus Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bartels Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bernstein Jared. 2014. “A Model of American Inequality, Opportunity, and Political Power.” In Working and Living in the Shadow of Economic Fragility., ed. Crain Marion and Sherraden Michael. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bhatti Yosef and Erikson Robert S.. 2011. “How Poorly are the Poor Represented in the U.S. Senate?” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns Peter K. and Wlezien Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Bonica Adam, McCarty Nolan, Poole Keith T., and Rosenthal Howard. 2013. “Why Hasn't Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(3): 103–24.
Box-Steffensmeier Janet M., De Boef Suzanna, and Lin Tse-Min. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” American Political Science Review 98(3): 515–28.
Citrin Jack and Green Donald Philip. 1990. “The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion.” In Research in Micropolitics, vol. 3, ed. Long Samuel. Greenwich: JAI Press.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Disch Lisa. 2012. “Democratic Representation and the Constituency Paradox.” Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 599616.
Domhoff G. William. 2002. “The Power Elite, Public Policy, and Public Opinion.” In Navigating Public Opinion, ed. Manza Jeff, Cook Fay Lomax, and Page Benjamin. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Druckman James N. and Jacobs Lawrence R.. 2011. “Segmented Representation: The Reagan White House and Disproportionate Responsiveness.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns Peter K. and Wlezien Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Ellis Christopher R., Daniel Ura Joseph, and Robinson Jenna Ashley. 2006. “The Dynamic Consequences of Nonvoting in American National Elections.” Political Research Quarterly. 59(2): 227–33.
Enns Peter K. and Kellstedt Paul M.. 2008. “Policy Mood and Political Sophistication: Why Everybody Moves Mood.” British Journal of Political Science 38(3): 433–54.
Enns Peter K. Kelly Nathan J., Morgan Jana, Volscho Thomas and Witko Christopher. 2014. “Conditional Status Quo Bias and Top Income Shares: How U.S. Political Institutions Have Benefited the Rich.” Journal of Politics 76(2): 289303.
Enns Peter K. and Wlezien Christopher. 2011. “Group Opinion and the Study of Representation.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns Peter K. and Wlezien Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Erikson Robert S., Michael MacKuen B., and Stimson James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ferguson Thomas. 1995. Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Franko William, Tolbert Caroline J., and Witko Christopher. 2013. “Inequality, Self-Interest, and Public Support for ‘Robin Hood’ Tax Policies.” Political Research Quarterly 66(4): 923–37.
Gaventa John. 1982. Power and Powerlessness. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Gilens Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gilens Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5) :778–96.
Gilens Martin. 2009. “Preference Gaps and Inequality in Representation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42(2): 335–41.
Gilens Martin. 2011. “Policy Consequences of Representational Inequality.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns Peter K. and Wlezien Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gilens Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
Gilens Martin and Page Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives Politics 12(3): 564–81.
Hacker Jacob S. and Pierson Paul. 2005. “Abandoning the Middle: The Bush Tax Cuts and the Limits of Democratic Control.” Perspectives on Politics 3(1): 3353.
Heith Diane J. 1998. “Staffing the White House Public Opinion Apparatus 1969–1988.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62(2): 165–89.
Hetherington Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 619–31.
Hochschild Jennifer. 1979. “Why the Dog Doesn't Bark: Income, Attitudes, and the Redistribution of Wealth.” Polity 11: 478511.
Hochschild Jennifer. 1981. What's Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Jacobs Lawrence R. and Page Benjamin I.. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?American Political Science Review 99(1): 107–24.
Jacobs Lawrence R. and Shapiro Robert Y.. 1994. “Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming: The Use of Private Polls in Kennedy's 1960 Presidential Campaign.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 527–40.
Jacobs Lawrence R., and Shapiro Robert Y.. 1995. “The Rise of Presidential Polling: The Nixon White House in Historical Perspective.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59(2): 163–95.
Jacobs Lawrence R. and Skocpol Theda. 2005. “American Democracy in an Era of Rising Inequality.” In Inequality and American Democracy, ed. Jacobs Lawrence R. and Skocpol Theda. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Jacobson Gary C. 2012. “The Electoral Origins of Polarized Politics: Evidence from the 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” American Behavioral Scientist 56(12): 1612–30.
Jacoby William G. 2014 “Is There a Culture War? Conflicting Value Structures in American Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 108(4): 754–71.
Kaufmann Karen M. and Petrocik John R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 864–87.
Kelly Nathan J. and Enns Peter K.. 2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-Reinforcing Link between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 54(4): 855–70.
Kinder Donald R. and Sanders Lynn M.. 1996. Divided by Color. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lau Richard R. and Heldman Caroline. 2009. “Self-Interest, Symbolic Attitudes, and Support for Public Policy.” Political Psychology 30(4): 513–37.
Leighley Jan E. and Nagler Jonathan. 2014. Who Votes Now? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Levendusky Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lupu Noam and Pontusson Jonas. 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 105(2): 316–36.
Mansbridge Jane J. 1990. “Preface.” In Beyond Self-Interest, ed. Mansbridge Jane J.. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Mansbridge Jane J. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–28.
Monroe Alan. 1979. “Consistency between Constituency Preferences and National Policy Decisions.” American Politics Quarterly 12: 319.
O'Brien Steven, McGuire Paula, McPherson James M., and Gerstle Gary. 1991. American Political Leaders: From Colonial Times to the Present. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Page Benjamin I. and Shapiro Robert Y.. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77(1): 175–90.
Page Benjamin I., and Shapiro Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Pitkin Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rhodes Jesse H. and Schaffner Brian F.. 2013. “Economic Inequality and Representation in the U.S. House: A New Approach Using Population-Level Data.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 2013.
Rigby Elizabeth and Wright Gerald C.. 2011. “Whose Statehouse Democracy? Policy Responsiveness to Poor versus Rich Constituents in Poor versus Rich States.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns Peter K. and Wlezien Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Schattschneider E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Sears David O. and Funk Carolyn L.. 1990. “The Limited Effect of Economic Self-interest on the Political Attitudes of the Mass Public.” Journal of Behavioral Economics 19: 247–71.
Shapiro Robert Y. and Young John M.. 1986. “The Polls: Medical Care in the United States.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 418–28.
Sombart Werner. 1976 [1906]. Why There Is No Socialism in the United States. New York: Sharpe.
Soroka Stuart N. and Wlezien Christopher. 2008. “On the Limits to Inequality in Representation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41(2) :319–27.
Stimson James A., MacKuen Michael B., and Erikson Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–65.
Winters Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Winters Jeffrey A. and Page Benjamin I.. 2009. “Oligarchy in the United States?” Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 731–51.
Wlezien Christopher and Soroka Stuart. 2011. “Inequality in Policy Responsiveness?” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns Peter K. and Wlezien Christopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Wolfinger Raymond E. and Rosenstone Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Enns supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (460 KB)
460 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 237 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1184 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.