Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Scholasticism in Political Science

  • Lawrence M. Mead (a1)
Abstract

Criticism of trends in political science centers on specific methodologies—quantitative methods or rational choice. However, the more worrisome development is scholasticism—a tendency for research to become overspecialized and ingrown. I define that trend more closely and document its growth through increases in numbers of journals, organized sections in the American Political Science Association, and divisions within the APSA conference. I also code articles published in the American Political Science Review to show a growth in scholastic features in recent decades. The changes affect all fields in political science. Scholasticism serves values of rigor. To restrain it will require reemphasizing relevance to real-world issues and audiences. To do this should also help restore morale among political scientists.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Almond Gabriel A. 1988a. “The Return to the State.” American Political Science Review 82 (3): 853–74.
Almond Gabriel. 1988b. “Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21(4): 828–42.
Almond Gabriel A., and Genco Stephen J.. 1977. “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics.” World Politics 29(4): 489522.
Arnold R. Douglas. 1982. “Overtilled and Undertilled Fields in American Politics.” Political Science Quarterly 97(1): 91103.
Beck Nathaniel, and Katz Jonathan N.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 634–47.
Beer Samuel H. 1976. “The Adoption of General Revenue Sharing: A Case Study in Public Sector Politics.” Public Policy 24(2): 127–95.
Beer Samuel H. 1977. “Political Overload and Federalism.” Polity 10(4): 617.
Beer Samuel H. 1978. “Federalism, Nationalism, and Democracy in America.” American Political Science Review 72(1): 921.
Brintnall Michael. 1991. “Organized Sections in APSA: A Status Report.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24(3): 559–63.
Cohn Jonathan. 1999. “Irrational Exuberance: When Did Political Science Forget About Politics?The New Republic, October 25, 2531.
Edwards Mickey. 2003. “Political Science and Political Practice: The Pursuit of Grounded Inquiry.” Perspectives on Politics 1(2): 349–54.
Fiorina Morris P. 1989. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment, 2d ed. New Haven: Yale University Press..
Fiorina Morris P. 1996. Divided Government. 2d ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Friedman Milton. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Geertz Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
Gerber Alan. 1998. “Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables.” American Political Science Review 92 (2): 401–11.
Green Donald P., and Shapiro Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hooghe Liesbet, and Marks Gary. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97(2): 233–43.
Jenco Leigh Kathryn. 2007‘What Does Heaven Ever Say?’ A Methods-centered Approach to Cross-cultural Engagement.” American Political Science Review 101(4): 741–55.
King Gary. 1991. “How Not to Lie With Statistics: Avoiding Common Mistakes in Quantitative Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 35(3): 1047–53.
King Gary, 1995. “Replication, Replication.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 444–52.
King Gary, Keohane Robert D., and Verba Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Laitin David D., Caporaso James A., Collier David, Rogowski Ronald, Tarrow Sidney, King Gary, Keohane Robert D., and Verba Sidney. 1995. “Review Symposium: The Qualitative-Quantitative Disputation: Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba's Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research.” American Political Science Review 89(2): 454–81.
Lax Jeffrey R. 2007. “Constructing Legal Rules on Appellate Courts.” American Political Science Review 101(3): 591604.
Losco Joseph. 1998. “Whither Intellectual Diversity in American Political Science? The Case of APSA and Organized Sections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31(4): 836–46.
Mansbridge Jane. 1989. “On the Relation between Program Committee Sections and Organized Sections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 22(3): 656–69.
Mayhew David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayhew David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Monroe Kristen Renwick, ed. 2005. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nagler Jonathan. 1991. “The Effect of Registration Laws and Education on U.S. Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 85(4): 1393–405.
Parenti Michael. 1983. “The State of the Discipline: One Interpretation of Everyone's Favorite Controversy.” PS: Political Science and Politics 16(2): 189–96.
Powell Robert. 2007. “Defending against Terrorist Attacks with Limited Resources.” American Political Science Review 101(3): 527–41.
Ricci David M. 1984. The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Roelofs H. Mark. 1988. “Liberation Theology: The Recovery of Biblical Radicalism.” American Political Science Review 82(2): 549–66.
Rudder Catherine E. 1988. “Report of the Executive Director, 1987–88.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21(2): 713–17.
Saxonhouse Arlene W. 1988. “The Tyranny of Reason in the World of the Polis.” American Political Science Review 82(4): 1261–75.
Shapiro Ian. 2002. “Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What's Wrong with Political Science and What To Do About It.” Political Theory 30(4): 596619.
Sigelman Lee. 2006a. “The Coevolution of American Political Science and the American Political Science Review.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 463–78.
Sigelman Lee. 2006b. “Top Twenty Commentaries: The American Political Science Review Citation Classics.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 667–9.
Smith Rogers M. 1988. “Political Jurisprudence, The “New Institutionalism,” and the Future of Public Law.” American Political Science Review 82(1): 89108.
Task Force on Inequality, and American Democracy, American Political Science Association. 2004. “American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality.” Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 651–66.
Thomas George. 2005. “The Qualitative Foundations of Political Science Methodology.” Perspectives on Politics 3(4): 855–66.
Timpone Richard J. 1998. “Structure, Behavior, and Voter Turnout in the United States.” American Political Science Review 92(4): 145–58.
Wald Kenneth D., Owen Dennis E., and Hill Samuel S. Jr. 1988. “Churches as Political Communities.” American Political Science Review 82(2): 531–48.
Wolfe Alan. 2005. “Reality in Political Science.” Chronicle Review (Chronicle of Higher Education), November 4.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Mead supplementary material
Averages from APSR Coding for Figures 4 and 5

 Unknown (2 KB)
2 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Mead supplementary material
Explanatory files

 Word (31 KB)
31 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Mead supplementary material
APSR Articles by Methodological Orientation and Field

 Unknown (37 KB)
37 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Mead supplementary material
APSA Member and Section Data for Figures 2 and 3

 Unknown (1 KB)
1 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Mead supplementary material
Journal data for Figure 1

 Unknown (640 bytes)
640 bytes

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 34
Total number of PDF views: 120 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 437 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.