Skip to main content

The Strength to Concede: Ruling Parties and Democratization in Developmental Asia

  • Dan Slater (a1) and Joseph Wong (a2)

Authoritarian ruling parties are expected to be exceptionally resistant to democratization. Yet some of the strongest authoritarian parties in the world have not resisted democratization, but have embraced it. This is because their raison d'etre is to continue ruling, not necessarily to remain authoritarian. Democratization requires that ruling parties hold free and fair elections, but not that they lose them. Authoritarian ruling parties can thus be incentivized to concede democratization from a position of exceptional strength as well as extreme weakness. This “conceding-to-thrive” scenario is most likely to unfold when regimes (1) possess substantial antecedent political strengths and resource advantages, (2) suffer ominous setbacks signaling that they have passed their apex of domination, and (3) pursue new legitimation strategies to arrest their incipient decline. We illustrate this heretofore neglected alternative democratization pathway through a comparative-historical analysis of three Asian developmental states where ruling parties have democratized from varying positions of considerable strength: Taiwan, South Korea, and Indonesia. We then consider the implications of our analysis for three “candidate cases” in developmental Asia where ruling parties have not yet conceded democratization despite being well-positioned to thrive were they to do so: Singapore, Malaysia, and the world's most populous dictatorship, China.

Hide All
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Albertus, Michael, and Menaldo, Victor. Forthcoming. “Gaming Democracy: Elite Domination during Transition and the Prospects for Redistribution.” British Journal of Political Science.
Anderson, Benedict R. O'G. 1983. “Old State, New Society: Indonesia's New Order in Comparative Historical Perspective.” Journal of Asian Studies 42(3): 477–96.
Aspinall, Edward. 2005. Opposing Suharto: Compromise, Resistance and Regime Change in Indonesia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Billet, Bret. 1990. “South Korea at the Crossroads: An Evolving Democracy or Authoritarianism Revisited?Asian Survey 30(3): 300311.
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chao, Linda, and Myers, Ramon. 1998. The First Chinese Democracy: Political Life in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cotton, James. 1989. “From Authoritarianism to Democracy in South Korea.” Political Studies 37: 244–59.
Cox, Gary W. 2009. “Authoritarian Elections and Leadership Succession, 1975–2004.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, September.
Crouch, Harold. 2011. Political Reform in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS.
Dickson, Bruce. 1996. “The Kuomintang Before Democratization: Organizational Change and the Role of Election.” In Tien, Hung-Mao, ed., Taiwan's Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe), pp. 4278
Doner, Richard, Ritchie, Bryan, and Slater, Dan. 2005. “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective.” International Organization 59(2): 327–61.
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–44.
Gilley, Bruce. 2004. China's Democratic Future: How It Will Happen and Where It Will Lead. New York: Columbia University Press.
Goodwin, Jeff. 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Han, Sung-Joo. 1988. “South Korea in 1987: The Politics of Democratization.” Asian Survey 28(1): 5261.
Harjanto, Nico. 2010. “Political Party Survival: The Golongan Karya Party and Electoral Politics in Indonesia.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Northern Illinois University, Department of Political Science.
Kim, Byung-Kook. 2011. “The Leviathan: Economic Bureaucracy Under Park.” In The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea, eds. Kim, Byung-Kook and Vogel, Ezra. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lee, Namhee. 2007. The Making of Minjung: Democracy and the Politics of Representation in South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lee, Sang-Chul, and Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1994. “Korean President Roh Tae-Woo's 1988 Inaugural Address: Campaigning for Investiture.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 80(1): 3752.
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MacIntyre, Andrew. 2001. “Institutions and Investors: The Politics of the Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia.” International Organization 55(1): 81122.
Mattlin, Mikael. 2011. Politicized Society: The Long Shadow of Taiwan's One-Party Legacy. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.
Moody, Peter. 1992. Political Change on Taiwan: A Study of Ruling Party Adaptability. New York: Praeger.
Moon, Chung-In, and Jun, Byung-Joon. 2011. “Modernization Strategies: Ideas and Influences.” In The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea, eds. Kim, Byung-Kook and Vogel, Ezra. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nalepa, Monika. 2010. Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pei, Minxin. 2006. China's Trapped Transition: The Limits of Developmental Autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rigger, Shelley. 1999. Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. New York: Routledge.
Slater, Dan. 2009. “Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia.” American Journal of Sociology 115(1): 203254.
Slater, Dan. 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Slater, Dan. 2012. “Strong-State Democratization in Malaysia and Singapore.” Journal of Democracy 23(2): 1933.
Slater, Dan, and Fenner, Sofia. 2011. “State Power and Staying Power: Infrastructural Mechanisms and Authoritarian Durability.” Journal of International Affairs 65(1): 1529.
Smith, Benjamin. 2007. Hard Times in the Lands of Plenty: Oil Politics in Iran and Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Tomsa, Dirk. 2008. Party Politics and Democratization in Indonesia: Golkar in the Post-Suharto Era. New York: Routledge.
Verdugo, Lorenzo Ernesto Bernal, and Hernandez-Company, Jose Antonio. 2012. “Why Parties? The Logic of Opposition Party Formation and Endurance in Authoritarian Settings.” Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, April.
Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wedeen, Lisa. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wong, Joseph. 2004a. “Democratization and the Left: Comparing East Asia and Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 37(11): 1213–37.
Wong, Joseph. 2004b. Healthy Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wong, Joseph. 2011. Betting on Biotech: Innovation and the Limits of Asia's Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Ziblatt, Daniel. Forthcoming. Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy in Modern Europe, 1848–1950. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 29
Total number of PDF views: 520 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1591 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.