Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Strength to Concede: Ruling Parties and Democratization in Developmental Asia

  • Dan Slater (a1) and Joseph Wong (a2)
Abstract

Authoritarian ruling parties are expected to be exceptionally resistant to democratization. Yet some of the strongest authoritarian parties in the world have not resisted democratization, but have embraced it. This is because their raison d'etre is to continue ruling, not necessarily to remain authoritarian. Democratization requires that ruling parties hold free and fair elections, but not that they lose them. Authoritarian ruling parties can thus be incentivized to concede democratization from a position of exceptional strength as well as extreme weakness. This “conceding-to-thrive” scenario is most likely to unfold when regimes (1) possess substantial antecedent political strengths and resource advantages, (2) suffer ominous setbacks signaling that they have passed their apex of domination, and (3) pursue new legitimation strategies to arrest their incipient decline. We illustrate this heretofore neglected alternative democratization pathway through a comparative-historical analysis of three Asian developmental states where ruling parties have democratized from varying positions of considerable strength: Taiwan, South Korea, and Indonesia. We then consider the implications of our analysis for three “candidate cases” in developmental Asia where ruling parties have not yet conceded democratization despite being well-positioned to thrive were they to do so: Singapore, Malaysia, and the world's most populous dictatorship, China.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Bret Billet . 1990. “South Korea at the Crossroads: An Evolving Democracy or Authoritarianism Revisited?Asian Survey 30(3): 300311.

Jason Brownlee . 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.

James Cotton . 1989. “From Authoritarianism to Democracy in South Korea.” Political Studies 37: 244–59.

Richard Doner , Bryan Ritchie , and Dan Slater . 2005. “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective.” International Organization 59(2): 327–61.

Barbara Geddes . 1999. “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–44.

Jeff Goodwin . 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Anna Grzymala-Busse . 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Byung-Kook Kim . 2011. “The Leviathan: Economic Bureaucracy Under Park.” In The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea, eds. Byung-Kook Kim and Ezra Vogel . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Sang-Chul Lee , and Karlyn Kohrs Campbell . 1994. “Korean President Roh Tae-Woo's 1988 Inaugural Address: Campaigning for Investiture.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 80(1): 3752.

Steven Levitsky , and Lucan A. Way . 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Chung-In Moon , and Byung-Joon Jun . 2011. “Modernization Strategies: Ideas and Influences.” In The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea, eds. Byung-Kook Kim and Ezra Vogel . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Monika Nalepa . 2010. Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Minxin Pei . 2006. China's Trapped Transition: The Limits of Developmental Autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Adam Przeworski . 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dan Slater . 2009. “Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia.” American Journal of Sociology 115(1): 203254.

Dan Slater . 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dan Slater . 2012. “Strong-State Democratization in Malaysia and Singapore.” Journal of Democracy 23(2): 1933.

Joseph Wong . 2004a. “Democratization and the Left: Comparing East Asia and Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 37(11): 1213–37.

Joseph Wong . 2011. Betting on Biotech: Innovation and the Limits of Asia's Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 22
Total number of PDF views: 263 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 806 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.