Mirilovic, Nikola and Kim, Myunghee 2017. Ideology and Threat Perceptions: American Public Opinion toward China and Iran. Political Studies, Vol. 65, Issue. 1, p. 179.
Rohlinger, Deana A. and Bunnage, Leslie 2017. Did the Tea Party Movement Fuel the Trump-Train? The Role of Social Media in Activist Persistence and Political Change in the 21st Century. Social Media + Society, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 205630511770678.
Lupton, Robert N. Myers, William M. and Thornton, Judd R. 2017. Party Animals: Asymmetric Ideological Constraint among Democratic and Republican Party Activists. Political Research Quarterly, p. 106591291771896.
Graber, Mark A. 2017. Judicial Supremacy and the Structure of Partisan Conflict. Indiana Law Review, Vol. 50, Issue. 1, p. 141.
Goering, John and Whitehead, Christine M. E. 2017. Fiscal Austerity and Rental Housing Policy in the United States and United Kingdom, 2010–2016. Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 27, Issue. 6, p. 875.
Krimmel, Katherine and Rader, Kelly 2017. The Federal Spending Paradox: Economic Self-Interest and Symbolic Racism in Contemporary Fiscal Politics. American Politics Research, Vol. 45, Issue. 5, p. 727.
Ceresola, Ryan 2017. The Influence of Cultural Capital on How AmeriCorps Members Interpret Their Service. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,
Heaney, Michael T. 2017. Activism in an Era of Partisan Polarization. PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 50, Issue. 04, p. 1000.
CARAMANI, DANIELE 2017. Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government. American Political Science Review, Vol. 111, Issue. 01, p. 54.
Linkous, Evangeline R. 2017. A Political Ecology of Exurbia in the Sunbelt: Lessons from an Award-Winning, “Unworkable” Plan. Urban Affairs Review, p. 107808741772617.
Cao, Hao 2017. Diagnosis and prognosis of neo-liberal globalization: From the Tea Party movement’s perspective. Global Media and Communication, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. 105.
Arato, Andrew and Cohen, Jean L. 2017. Civil society, populism and religion. Constellations, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 283.
Braunstein, Ruth and Taylor, Malaena 2017. Is the Tea Party a “Religious” Movement? Religiosity in the Tea Party versus the Religious Right. Sociology of Religion, Vol. 78, Issue. 1, p. 33.
Simon, Dennis and Palmer, Barbara 2017. The trail blazers: women as third-party candidates in elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1912–2012. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 5, Issue. 4, p. 660.
Redbird, Beth and Grusky, David B. 2016. Distributional Effects of the Great Recession: Where Has All the Sociology Gone?. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 42, Issue. 1, p. 185.
Gervais, Bryan T. and Taylor, Jeffrey A. 2016. Subpartisan Cues and Ideological Distinctions: The Effect of the Tea Party Label on Voter Perceptions of Congressional Candidates*. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 97, Issue. 5, p. 1130.
Maxwell, Angie 2016. A Tale of Two Tea Parties? Southern Distinctiveness and Tea Party Membership. PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 49, Issue. 02, p. 210.
Knuckey, Jonathan and Kim, Myunghee 2016. Evaluations of Michelle Obama as First Lady: The Role of Racial Resentment. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 46, Issue. 2, p. 365.
Dholakia, Nikhilesh 2016. Marketing as mystification. Marketing Theory, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 401.
Haltinner, Kristin 2016. Individual Responsibility, Culture, or State Organized Enslavement? How Tea Party Activists Frame Racial Inequality. Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 395.
In the aftermath of a potentially demoralizing 2008 electoral defeat, when the Republican Party seemed widely discredited, the emergence of the Tea Party provided conservative activists with a new identity funded by Republican business elites and reinforced by a network of conservative media sources. Untethered from recent GOP baggage and policy specifics, the Tea Party energized disgruntled white middle-class conservatives and garnered widespread attention, despite stagnant or declining favorability ratings among the general public. As participant observation and interviews with Massachusetts activists reveal, Tea Partiers are not monolithically hostile toward government; they distinguish between programs perceived as going to hard-working contributors to US society like themselves and “handouts” perceived as going to unworthy or freeloading people. During 2010, Tea Party activism reshaped many GOP primaries and enhanced voter turnout, but achieved a mixed record in the November general election. Activism may well continue to influence dynamics in Congress and GOP presidential primaries. Even if the Tea Party eventually subsides, it has undercut Obama's presidency, revitalized conservatism, and pulled the national Republican Party toward the far right.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.