Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Tradition, Modernity, and Democracy: The Many Promises of Islam

  • Anna Seleny (a1)

Pragmatism, decentralization, and pluralism are typically associated with modern democracies. Yet these are also the attributes that make Islam a widely accessible political-cultural resource. Indeed, such attributes allow for multiple activisms while sparing activists the macro-coordination challenges that often hamper growing movements, and the inertia that can seize vertical organizations. But while Islamists across the spectrum have increasingly deployed this resource, secularists of various stripes have mostly eschewed it. The aggregate effect has been to amplify the voices and to raise the profiles of Islamist groups at the expense of self-described moderns and their secular ideologies. I call this Islamism's reverberation effect.

Deliberate integration of Islamic tradition with democratic thought and action holds substantial promise. Pro-democratic Muslims, backed by Islam's renovated classical principles and practices, can better counter supremacist claims as they arise in the plural contestations that Islam itself helps generate. They can also realistically seek a firm consensus on the inviolable status of Islamic tolerance, which in turn can serve as a functional equivalent to the central authority that Islam lacks. Most importantly, by reconsidering the modernist ideational boundary that separates religion and politics, pro-democratic Muslims can begin to reclaim the transformative power of tradition.Anna Seleny is Professor of the Practice of International Politics at Fletcher School of Law & Diplomacy ( She would like to acknowledge the generous support of the Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination at Princeton University in the research and writing of this article. She is grateful to Hassan Abbas, Sheri Berman, Consuelo Cruz, Malik Mufti, Assaf Moghadam, and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Byman, Daniel, MichaelScheuer, AnatolLieven, and W. PatrickLang. 2005. Symposium: Iraq, Afghanistan, and the war on “terror”. Middle East Policy12 (I): 124.

El-Affendi, Abdelwahab. 2003. What is liberal Islam? The elusive reformation. Journal of Democracy14 (2): 378.

Ganguly, Sumit. 2003. The crisis of Indian secularism. Journal of Democracy14 (4): 1125.

Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A.Way. 2002. The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy13 (2): 5165.

Masmoudi, Radwan. 2002. What is liberal Islam: The silenced majority. Journal of Democracy14 (2): 402.

Nasr, Vali. 2005. The rise of Muslim democracy. Journal of Democracy16 (2): 1327.

Philpot, Daniel. 2000. The religious roots of modern international relations. World Politics52 (2): 20645.

Schwedler, Jillian. 2001. Islamic identity: Myth, menace, or mobilizer?SAIS Review21 (2): 117.

Shevtsova, Lillia F.2001. Russian's hybrid regime. Journal of Democracy12 (4): 6570.

Shah, Aqil. 2003. Pakistan's armored democracy. Journal of Democracy14 (4): 2640.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 20 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 81 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.