Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Trump-ing Foreign Affairs: Status Threat and Foreign Policy Preferences on the Right

  • Rachel Marie Blum and Christopher Sebastian Parker

Abstract

President Trump is often at odds with the conservative establishment over a range of issues, not least of which is foreign policy. Yet it remains unclear whether supporting “Trumpism” is commensurate with coherent foreign policy views that are distinct from conventionally conservative positions. We evaluate whether the foreign policy views of Trump’s supporters, both in the voting public and among activists, differ from those of other Republicans. We use the 2016 ANES to examine Republican primary voters and the new 2016 State Convention Delegate Study to assess Republican activists. In doing so, we reveal systematic differences in foreign policy preferences between Trump supporters and more establishment conservatives. We demonstrate that the status-threat model need not be confined to domestic politics. Indeed, it may be extended to explain foreign policy preferences on the political right, that of Trump’s supporters in the present case. In doing so, we also find evidence that status threat may well be the source of fracture in the Republican Party.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Trump-ing Foreign Affairs: Status Threat and Foreign Policy Preferences on the Right
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Trump-ing Foreign Affairs: Status Threat and Foreign Policy Preferences on the Right
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Trump-ing Foreign Affairs: Status Threat and Foreign Policy Preferences on the Right
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All

A list of permanent links to Supplemental Materials provided by the authors precedes the References section.

*

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GNCDZR

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60(3): 634–52.
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?Journal of Politics 70(2): 542–55.
Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., Rickershauser, Jill, and Rohde, David W.. 2007. “Fear in the Voting Booth: The 2004 Presidential Election.” Political Behavior 29(2): 197220.
Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 718–37.
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich, John H. and Rohde, David W.. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection. In Congress Reconsidered. 7th ed., eds. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 269–92.
Allitt, Patrick. 2009. The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities throughout American History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
American National Election Studies, University of Michigan, and Stanford University. “ANES 2016 Time Series Study.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2017-09-19. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36824.v2
Bartels, Larry. 2018. “Partisanship in the Trump Era.” Journal of Politics 80(4): 1483–94.
Bender, Michael C. 2018. “Donald Trump’s Approval Rating Inches Higher, Buoyed by Republican Support.” Wall Street Journal, July 22. https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trumps-approval-rating-inches-higher-buoyed-by-republican-support-1532293201.
Blair Center. 2015. “Tea Party Distinguished by Racial Views and Fear of the Future: Findings from the Blair-Rockefeller poll.” Diane D. Blair Center of Southern Politics and Society. https://blaircenter.uark.edu/polling-data-reports/2010-poll/tea-party/
Blum, Rachel. 2018. “Anti-Elitism or Economics? The Tea Party and Shifting Fault Lines in the GOP.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, 31 August .
Blum, Rachel. Forthcoming. Party Takeover: The Tea Party and Party Factions in the U.S. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bobo, Lawrence and Hutchings, Vincent L.. 1996. “Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer’s Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context.” American Sociological Review 61(6): 951–72.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cherlin, Andrew. 2016. “The Downwardly Mobile for Trump.” New York Times , August 25. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/25/opinion/campaign-stops/the-downwardly-mobile-for-trump.html?_r=0.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Conway, M. Margaret and Feigert, Frank B.. 1968. “Motivations, Incentive Systems, and the Political Party Organization.” American Political Science Review 62(4): 1159–73.
Copeland, Dale. 1996. “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations.’’ International Security 20(4): 541.
Craig, Maureen A. and Richeson., Jennifer 2014. “On the Precipice of a ‘Majority–Minority’ America: Perceived Status Threat from the Racial Demographic Shift Affects White Americans’ Political Ideology. Psychological Science 25(6): 1189–97.
Dueck, Colin. 2006. Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Devos, Thierry and Banaji, Mahzarin R.. 2005. “American = White?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88(3): 447466.
Economist. 2016. “What Donald Trump Thinks about Trade.’’ November 9. https://www.economist.com/united-states/2016/11/09/how-donald-trump-thinks-about-trade.
Federico, Christopher M. and Golec de Zavala, Agnieszka. 2018. “Collective Narcissism and the 2016 US Presidential Vote.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82(1): 110–21.
Feldman, Stanley and Karen Stenner, . 1997. “Perceived threat and authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 18(4): 741–70.
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
FiveThirtyEight. 2019. “Tracking Congress in the Age of Trump.” Retrieved January 19, 2019. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/.
Freeman, Jo. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101(3): 327–56.
Frum, David. 2017. “Conservatism Can’t Survive Donald Trump Intact.” The Atlantic, December 19. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/12/conservatism-is-what-conservatives-think-say-and-do/548738/.
Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2010. “Foreign Policy at the Ballot Box: How Citizens Use Foreign Policy to Judge and Choose Candidates.” Journal of Politics 72(4): 1046–62.
Gervais, Bryan and Morris, Irwin. 2018. Reactionary Republicans: How the Tea Party in the House Paved the Way for Trump’s Victory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grossman, Matt and Hopkins, David A.. 2015. “Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 13(1): 119–39.
Grossman, Matt and Hopkins, David A.. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gusfield, Joseph R. 1963. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Herrera, Richard. 1992. “The Understanding of Ideological Labels by Political Elites: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 45(4): 1021–35.
Hofstadter, Richard. 1965. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holbrook, Colin, López-Rodríguez, Lucía Fessler, Daniel M. T., Vázquez, Alexandra, and Gómez, Ángel. 2017. “Gulliver’s Politics: Conservatives Envision Potential Enemies as Readily Vanquished and Physically Small.” Political Psychology 8(6): 670–78.
Holsti, Ole R. and Rosenau, James N.. 1996. “Liberals, Populists, Libertarians, and Conservatives: The Link between Domestic and International Affairs.” International Political Science Review 17(1): 2954.
Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, eds. Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard 9–30. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–75.
Kabaservice, Geoffrey. 2012. Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party, from Eisenhower to the Tea Party. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karol, David and Miguel, Edward. 2007. “The Electoral Cost of War: Iraq Casualties and the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 69(3): 633–48.
Kay, Katy. 2017. “Why Trump’s Supporters Will Never Abandon HimBBC News, August 23. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41028733.
Keele, Luke. 2005. “The Authorities Really Do Matter: Party Control and Trust in Government.” Journal of Politics 67(3): 873–86.
Kirk, Russell. 1953: The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot . Washington, DC: Regnery Press.
La Raja, Raymond J., and Shaffner, Brian F.. 2015. Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Layman, Geoffrey C. and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 786802.
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., Green, John C., Herrera, Richard, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 104(2): 324–46.
Lenz, Gabriel. 2012. Follow the Leader: How Voters Respond to Politicians Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levine, Robert and Campbell, Donald. 1972. Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes, and Group Behavior. New York: Wiley.
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Raab, Earl. 1978. The Politics of Unreason: Right-Wing Extremism in America, 1790–1970. New York: Harper and Row.
MacLean, Nancy. 1994. Behind the Mask of Chivalry: The Making of the Second Ku Klux Klan. New York: Oxford University Press.
MacWilliams, Matthew C. 2016. “Who Decides When the Party Doesn’t: Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Trump.” PS: Political Science and Politics 49(4): 716–21.
Major, Brenda, Blodorn, Alison, and Major Blascovich, Gregory. 2016. “The Threat of Increasing Diversity: Why Many White Americans Support Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 21(6): 931–40.
Manza, Jeff and Crowley, Ned. 2017. “Working Class Hero? Interrogating the Social Bases of the Rise of Donald Trump.” The Forum, May 17.
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “`I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 128–45.
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCann, James A. 1995. “Nomination Politics and Ideological Polarization: Assessing the Attitudinal Effects of Campaign Involvement.” Journal of Politics 57(1): 101–20.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. The Realignment of National Politics and Income Distribution. Washington, DC: AEI Press
McClosky, Herbert, Hoffman, Paul, and O’Hara, Rosemary 1960. “Issue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers.” American Political Science Review 54(2): 406–72.
McGirr, Lisa. 2001. Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New Right . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McVeigh, Rory. 2009. The Rise of the Ku Klux Klan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Miller, Gary and Schofield, Norman. 2003. “Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 97(2): 245–60.
Miller, Warren E. and Kent Jennings, M.. 1986. Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Sage.
Mutz, Diana. 2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15(19): E4330E4339.
Nincic, Miroslav and Hinckley, Barbara. 1991. “Foreign Policy and the Evaluation of Presidential Candidates.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35(2): 333–55.
Noel, Hans. 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norpoth, Helmut and Sidman, Andrew H.. 2007. “Mission Accomplished: The Wartime Election of 2004.” Political Behavior 29(2): 175–95.
Oakeshott, Michael. 1962. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. New York: Basic Books.
Parker, Christopher S. and Barreto, Matt A.. 2014. Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40(3): 825–50.
Pettigrew, Thomas F. 2017. “Social Psychological Perspectives on Trump Supporters.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 5(1): 107–16.
Pollock, Philip H., Lilie, Stuart A., and Elliot Vittes, M.. 1993. “Hard Issues, Core Values and Vertical Constraint: The Case of Nuclear Power.” British Journal of Political Science 23(1): 2950.
Pratto, Felicia, Jim Sidanius, Stallworth, Lisa M. and Malle, Benjamin F.. 1994. “Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes.’’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67(4): 741763.
Rathbun, Brian. 2007. “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Understanding the Multiple Meanings of a Crucial Concept in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 51(3): 533–57.
Rathbun, Brian. 2008. “Does One Right Make a Realist? Conservatism, Neoconservatism, and Isolationism in the Foreign Policy Ideology of American Elites.” Political Science Quarterly 123(2): 271–99.
Rathbun, Brian. 2013. “Steeped in International Affairs? The Foreign Policy Views of the Tea Party.” Foreign Policy Analysis 9(1): 2137.
Rathbun, Brian, Kertzer, Joshua D. Reifler, Jason Goren, Paul and Scotto, Thomas J.. 2016. “Taking Foreign Policy Personally: Personal Values and Foreign Policy Attitudes.” International Studies Quarterly 60(1): 124–37.
Reilly, Katie. 2018. “John McCain Calls Trump’s Press Conference with Putin ‘One of the Most Disgraceful Performances by an American President’.” CNN, July 16. http://time.com/5339932/john-mccain-statement-trump-putin-meeting/.
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenstone, Steven and Hansen, John. 1993. “Mobilization, Participation, and American Democracy.” New York: McMillan.
Rossiter, Clinton. 1982. Conservatism in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Saunders, Kyle L. and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 2004. “Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate.” American Politics Research 32(3): 285309.
Sides, John, Tesler, Michael and Vavrek, Lynn. 2018. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Smith, Anthony D. 1991. National Identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.
Stephens, Bret. 2017. “Trump’s Foreign Policy: The Conservatives’ Report Card.” New York Times, July 21. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/21/opinion/trumps-foreign-policy-the-conservatives-report-card.html.
Stone, Walter J. and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 1983. “Winning May Not Be Everything, But It’s More Than We Thought.” American Political Science Review 77(4): 945–56.
Verba, Sidney, Lehman Schlozman, Kay and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zaller, John. 1992. Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Blum and Parker Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Blum and Parker supplementary material
Blum and Parker supplementary material 1

 Unknown (1.6 MB)
1.6 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed