Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet

  • Kay Lehman Schlozman (a1), Sidney Verba (a2) and Henry E. Brady (a3)

What is the impact of the possibility of political participation on the Internet on long-standing patterns of participatory inequality in American politics? An August 2008 representative survey of Americans conducted by the Pew Internet and American Life Project provides little evidence that there has been any change in the extent to which political participation is stratified by socio-economic status, but it suggests that the web has ameliorated the well-known participatory deficit among those who have just joined the electorate. Even when only that subset of the population with Internet access is considered, participatory acts such as contributing to candidates, contacting officials, signing a political petition, or communicating with political groups are as stratified socio-economically when done on the web as when done offline. The story is different for stratification by age where historically younger people have been less engaged than older people in most forms of political participation. Young adults are much more likely than their elders to be comfortable with electronic technologies and to use the Internet, but among Internet users, the young are not especially politically active. How these trends play out in the future depends on what happens to the current Web-savvy younger generation and the cohorts that follow and on the rapidly developing political capacities of the Web. Stay logged on …

Hide All
Alvarez Michael, and Hall Thad E.. 2004. Point, Click, and Vote. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Alvarez Michael, and Nagler Jonathan. 2001. “The Likely Consequences of Internet Voting for Political Representation.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 34(3): 11151153.
Benjamin Stuart Minor. 2006. “Evaluating E-Rulemaking: Public Participation and Political Institutions.” Duke Law Journal 55: 934–35.
Benkler Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Benner Jeffrey. 2002. “Bush Plan ‘Digital Distortion.’Wired. ( (accessed February 16, 2008).
Bennett Linda, and Bennett Stephen Earl. 1986. “Political Participation: Meaning and Measurement.” In Annual Review of Political Science, ed. Long Samuel. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Berinsky Adam J. 2005. “The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States.” American Politics Research 33(4): 471–91.
Best Samuel, and Krueger Brian. 2005. “Analyzing the Representativeness of Internet Political Participation.” Political Behavior 27(2): 183216.
Bimber Bruce. 1998. “The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism.” Polity 31(1): 138–60.
Bimber Bruce. 1999. “The Internet and Citizen Communication with Government: Does the Medium Matter?Political Communication 16(4): 409–28.
Bimber Bruce. 2001. “Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level.” Political Research Quarterly 54(1): 5367.
Bimber Bruce. 2003. Information and American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bimber Bruce, and Davis Richard. 2003. Campaigning Online. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brady Henry E. 1999. “Political Participation.” In Measures of Political Attitudes, ed. Robinson John P., Shaver Philip R., and Wrightsman Lawrence. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Brady Henry E., Schlozman Kay Lehman, and Verba Sidney. 1999. “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists.” American Political Science Review 93(1): 153–68.
Chadwick Andrew. 2006. Internet Politics: States Citizens and New Communications Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Compaine Benjamin M. 2001. “Declare the War Won.” In The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth, ed. Compaine Benjamin M.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Conway Margaret M. 2000. Political Participation in the United States. 3d ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Dahl Robert A. 2006. On Political Equality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Davis Richard. 1999. The Web of Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Davis Richard. 2005. Politics Online: Blogs, Chatrooms, and Discussion Groups in American Democracy. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Davis Richard. 2009. Typing Politics: The Role of Blogs in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Davis Steve, Elin Larry, and Reeher Grant. 2002. Click on Democracy: The Internet's Power to Change Political Apathy into Civic Action. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
DiMaggio Paul, Hargittai Eszter, Celeste Coral, and Shafer Steven. 2004. “Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use.” In Social Inequality, ed. Neckerman Kathryn M.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Herrnson Paul, Niemi Richard G., Hanmer Michael J., Bederson Benjamin B., Conrad Frederick C., and Traugott Michael W.. 2008. Voting Technology. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Hindman Matthew. 2009. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Horrigan John B., and Smith Aaron. 2007. “Home Broadband Adoption 2007.” Pew Internet and Public Life Project. (, (accessed February 16, 2008).
Jennings M. Kent, and Zeitner Vicki. 2003. “Internet Use and Civic Engagement.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67(3): 311–34.
Johnson Stephen M. 1998. “The Internet Changes Everything: Revolutionizing Public Participation and Access to Government Information through the Internet.” Administrative Law Review 50: 277337.
Kelly John. 2009. Review of The Myth of Digital Democracy by Matthew Hindman; Digital Citizenship: The Internet Society and Participation by Karen Mossberger, Caroline J. Tolbert, and Ramona S. McNeal; and Networked Publics edited by Kazys Varnelis. Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 941–43.
Leighley Jan E. 1995. “Attitudes, Opportunities and Incentives: A Field Essay on Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly 48(1): 181209.
Lupia Arthur, and Sin Gisela. 2003. “Which Public Goods Are Endangered: How Evolving Communication Technologies Affect ‘The Logic of Collective Action.’Public Choice 117(4): 319–21.
Margolis Michael, and Resnick David. 2000. Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace ‘Revolution.’ Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Milbrath Lester W., and Goel M.L.. 1977. Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? 2d ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Mossberger Karen, Tolbert Caroline J., and McNeal Ramona S.. 2008. Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mossberger Karen, Tolbert Caroline J., and Stansbury Mary. 2003. Virtual Inequality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
National Telecommunications, and Information Administration. 2004. A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age. (, (accessed February 16, 2008).
Nie Norman H., Junn Jane, and Stehlik-Barry Kenneth. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Norris Pippa. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prior Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenstone Steven J., and Hansen John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Schlosberg Davis, Zavestoski Stephen, and Schulman Stuart W.. 2007. “Democracy and E-Rulemaking: Web-Based Technologies, Participation, and the Potential for Deliberation.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 4(1): 3755.
Schlozman Kay Lehman. 2002. “Citizen Participation in America: What Do We Know? Why Do We Care?” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Katznelson Ira and Milner Helen V.., New York: W.W. Norton.
Schlozman Kay Lehman, Verba Sidney, and Brady Henry E.. 1999. “Civic Participation and the Equality Problem.” In Civic Engagement in American Democracy, ed. Skocpol Theda and Fiorina Morris P.. Washington: Brookings.
Shah Dhavan, Kwak Nojin, and Holbert R. Lance. 2001. “‘Connecting’ and ‘Disconnecting’ with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital.” Political Communication 18(2): 141–62.
Thomas Clayton, and Streib Gregory. 2003. “The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(1): 83102.
Tolbert Caroline J., and McNeal Ramona S.. 2003. “Unraveling the Effects on the Internet on Political Participation?Political Research Quarterly 56(2): 175–85.
Verba Sidney, and Nie Norman H.. 1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper Row.
Verba Sidney, Schlozman Kay Lehman, and Brady Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilhelm Anthony G. 2000. Democracy in the Digital Age. New York: Routledge Taylor Francis.
Wilhelm Anthony G. 2002. “Civic Participation and Technological Inequality: The ‘Killer Application’ Is Education.” In The Civic Web, ed. Anderson David M. and Cornfield Michael. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Williams Andrew Paul, and Tedesco John, eds. 2006. The Internet Election: Perspectives on the Web in Campaign 2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Wolfinger Raymond E., and Rosenstone Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Xenos Michael, and Moy Patricia. 2007. “Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement.” Journal of Communications 57(4): 704–16.
Zukin Cliff, Keeter Scott, Andolina Molly, Jenkins Krista, and Carpini Michael X. Delli. 2006. A New Engagement?: Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Schlozman et al. supplementary material
SPSS Code for all Results

 Unknown (42 KB)
42 KB
Supplementary Materials

Schlozman et al. supplementary material
Expanatory file

 Word (27 KB)
27 KB
Supplementary Materials

Schlozman et al. supplementary material
Statistical Tests of Differences between Offline and Online Participation

 Word (51 KB)
51 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 49
Total number of PDF views: 334 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1360 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.