Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

What Happened to Post-Partisanship? Barack Obama and the New American Party System

  • Sidney M. Milkis (a1), Jesse H. Rhodes (a2) and Emily J. Charnock (a3)

Ascending to the presidency in the midst of a severe economic crisis and an ongoing war on terrorism, Barack Obama faced numerous political and policy challenges. We examine the responsibilities he faced in assuming the received tasks of modern presidential leadership amid a polarized political system. To a point, Obama has embraced partisan leadership, indeed, even further articulating developments in the relationship between the president and parties that Ronald Reagan had first initiated, and George W. Bush built upon. Thus Obama has advanced an executive-centered party system that relies on presidential candidates and presidents to pronounce party doctrine, raise campaign funds, mobilize grassroots support, and campaign on behalf of their partisan brethren. Just as Reagan and Bush used their powers in ways that bolstered their parties, so Obama's exertions have strengthened the Democratic Party's capacity to mobilize voters and to advance programmatic objectives. At the same time, presidential partisanship threatens to relegate collective responsibility to executive aggrandizement. Seeking to avoid the pitfalls that undermined the Bush presidency, Obama has been more ambivalent about uniting partisanship and executive power. Only time will tell whether this ambiguity proves to be effective statecraft—enshrining his charisma in an enduring record of achievement and a new Democratic majority—or whether it marks a new stage in the development of executive dominion that subordinates party building to the cult of personality.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Charles M. Cameron 2002. “Studying the Polarized Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32(4): 647–63.

Jeffrey E. Cohen 2011. “Presidents, Polarization, and Divided Government.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 41(3): 504–20.

Marty Cohen , David Karol , and Hans Noel . 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Robert Dahl . 1990. “The Myth of the Presidential Mandate.” Political Science Quarterly 105(3): 355–72.

David Eckles , and Brian Schaffner . 2010. “Loss Aversion and the Framing of the Health Care Reform Debate.” The Forum 8(1): Article 7.

Daniel J. Galvin 2008. “Changing Course: Reversing the Organizational Trajectory of the Democratic Party from Bill Clinton to Barack Obama.” The Forum 6(2): Article 3.

Laurel Harbridge , and Neil Malhotra . 2011. “Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 494510.

William G. Howell 2003. Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jeffrey C. Isaac 2010. “Editor's Introduction.” Perspectives on Politics 8(3): 733–36.

Gary C. Jacobson 2010. “George W. Bush, the Iraq War, and the Election of Barack Obama.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 40(2): 207–24.

Desmond King , and Rogers Smith . 2011. Still a House Divided: Race and Politics in Obama's America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

David E. Lewis 2008. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Terry M. Moe , and William G. Howell . 1999. “The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations 15(1): 132–79.

David W. Nickerson , Ryan D. Friedrichs , and David C. King . 2006. “Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan.” Political Research Quarterly 59(1): 8597.

Spencer Piston . 2010. “How Explicit Racial Prejudice Hurt Obama in the 2008 Election,” Political Behavior 32 (December): 431451.

Andrew Rudalevige . 2005. The New Imperial Presidency. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 85 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 465 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.