Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from Contemporary International Relations

  • Daniel J. Levine and David M. McCourt
Abstract

Pluralism has become a buzzword in International Relations. It has emerged in a number of linked literatures and has drawn the support of an unusual coalition of scholars: advocates of greater methodological diversity; those who feel that IR has degenerated into a clash of paradigmatic “-isms”; those who favor a closer relationship between academics and policy-makers; and those who wish to see greater reflexivity within the field. Perhaps unsurprisingly, no single vision of pluralism unites these scholars; they appear to be using the term in divergent ways. Accordingly, our aim is threefold. First, we wish to highlight this odd state of affairs, by placing it in disciplinary and intellectual context. Second, we distinguish between plurality—the de facto recognition that IR has become a more diverse field—and pluralism—a normative position which values that diversity, given the public vocation of social science. Finally, we lay out a more consistent understanding and defense of pluralism in those latter terms. We argue that, properly understood, pluralism entails a position of epistemological skepticism: the straightforward claim that no single knowledge system, discipline, theory, or method can claim singular access to truth.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Acharya, Amitav. 2014. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58(4): 647–59.
Adcock, Robert, Bevir, Mark, and Stimson, Shannon. 2007. Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges since 1880. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Adorno, Theodor W. 1973. Negative Dialectics. New York: Continuum, 1973, tr. E. B. Ashton.
Adorno, Theodor W. and Horkheimer, Max. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Trans. Jephcott, Edmund. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Agathangelou, Anna and Ling, L. H. M.. 2004. “The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism.” International Studies Review 6(4): 2149.
Amoureux, Jack L. 2016. A Practice of Ethics for Global Politics: Ethical Reflexivity. London: Routledge.
Amoureux, Jack L. and Steele, Brent J.. 2016. Reflexivity and International Relations: Positionality, Critique, and Practice. London: Routledge.
Anievas, Alexander. 2014. Capital, the State and War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Anievas, Alexander, Manchanda, Nivi, and Shilliam, Robbie, eds. 2015. Race and Racism in International Relations. London: Routledge.
Arendt, Hannah. 1978. The Life of the Mind. New York: Harcourt.
Ashley, Richard K. and Walker, R. B. J.. 1990. “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 34(3): 259–68.
Ashworth, Lucian. 2002. “Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations.” International Relations 16(1): 3351.
Avey, Paul C. and Desch, Michael C.. 2014. “What Do Policymakers Want from Us? Results of a Survey of Current and Former Senior National Security Advisors.” International Studies Quarterly 58(2): 227–46.
Barder, Alexander. 2015. Empire Within: International Hierarchy and Its Imperial Laboratories of Governance. New York: Routledge.
Bastow, Simon, Dunleavy, Patrick, and Tinkler, Jane. 2014. The Impact of the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Benhabib, Seyla. 1994. “The Critique of Instrumental Reason.” In Mapping Ideologies, ed. Žižek, Slavoj. London: Verso.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Berlin, Isaiah. 1973. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bettelheim, Bruno. 1979. Surviving and Other Essays. New York: Knopf.
Bewes, Timothy. 2002. Reification. London: Verso.
Bilgin, Pinar. 2008. “Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR.” Third World Quarterly 29(1): 523.
Blyth, M. and Varghese, R.. 1999. “The State of the Discipline in American Political Science: Be Careful What You Wish For? British Journal of Politics & International Relations 1: 345–65.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, Chris. 2012. “The ‘Practice Turn’, Phronēsis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40(3): 439–56.
Buck-Morss, Susan. 1977. The Origin of Negative Dialectics: Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, and the Frankfurt Institute. New York: Free Press.
Buck-Morss, Susan. 2009. Hegel, History and Universal History. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank. 2007. “Reassembling and Dissecting: International Relations Practice from a Science Studies Perspective.” International Studies Perspectives 8(1): 90110.
Byman, Daniel and Kroenig, Matthew. 2016. “Reaching Beyond the Ivory Tower: A How To Manual.” Security Studies 25(2): 289319.
Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth, eds. 2012. Sage Handbook on International Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Carpenter, Charli. 2012. “‘You Talk of Terrible Things So Matter-of-Factly in This Language of Science’: Constructing Human Rights in the Academy.” Perspectives on Politics 10(2): 363–83.
Connolly, William E. 2004. “Problem, Method, Faith.” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corwin, Edward S. 1929. “The Democratic Dogma and the Future of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 23(3): 569–92.
Craig, Campbell. 2003. The Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dauphinee, Elizabeth. 2013. The Politics of Exile. Abingdon: Routledge.
Denemark, Robert, ed. 2010. The International Studies Encyclopedia. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Desch, Michael C. 2015. “Technique Trumps Relevance: The Professionalization of Political Science and the Marginalization of Security Studies.” Perspectives on Politics 13(2): 377–93.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1996. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dunne, Tim, Hansen, Lene, and Wight, Colin. 2013. “The End of International Theory?” European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 405–25.
Easton, David. 1969. “The New Revolution in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 63(4): 1051–61.
Ellis, Elizabeth 2004. “Provisionalism in the Study of Politics.” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erskine, Toni and Lebow, Richard Ned (eds.). 2012. Tragedy and International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Flyvbjerg, Brent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: How Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flyvbjerg, Brent. 2006. “A Perestroikan Straw Man Answers Back: David Laitin and Phronetic Political Science.” In Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method., ed. Schram, Sanford F. and Caterino, Brian. New York: New York University Press.
Friedrichs, Jörg. 2004. European Approaches to International Relations: A House with Many Mansions. London: Routledge.
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2017. “The Real Problem with Diversity in Political Science.” Duck of Minerva, April 27. Available at http://duckofminerva.com/2017/04/the-real-problem-with-diversity-in-political-science.html.
Gallucci, Robert L. 2012. “How Scholars can Improve International Relations.” Chronicle of Higher Education, November 26. Available at http://chronicle.com/article/How-Scholars-Can-Improve/135898/, accessed July 25, 2016.
Grovogui, Siba N. 1996. Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination in International Law. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Grovogui, Siba N. 2001. “Come to Africa: A Hermeneutics of Race in International Theory.” Alternatives 26(4): 425–48.
Guha, Ranajit. 2002. History at the Limit of World-History. New York: Columbia University Press.
Guilhot, Nicolas. 2011. The Invention of International Relations Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gunnell, John. 2015. “Pluralism and the Fate of Perestroika: A Historical Reflection.” Perspectives on Politics 13(2): 408–15.
Haas, Ernst B. and Haas, Peter. 2002. “Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions.” Millennium 31(3): 573601.
Haas, Ernst B., Williams, Mary Pat, and Babai, Don. 1977. Scientists and World Order: The Uses of Technical Knowledge in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hamati-Ataya, Inanna. 2011a. “Contemporary ‘Dissidence’ in American IR: The New Structure of Anti-Mainstream Scholarship?” International Studies Perspectives 12: 362–98.
Hamati-Ataya, Inanna. 2011b. “The ‘Problem of Values’ and International Relations Scholarship: From Applied Reflexivity to Reflexivism.” International Studies Review 13: 259–87.
Hendrix, Cullen. 2015. “Google Scholar Metrics and Scholarly Productivity in International Relations.” Duck of Minerva, August 6. Available at http://duckofminerva.com/2015/08/google-scholar-metrics-and-scholarly-productivity-in-international-relations.html#more-27500.
Hobson, John. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobson, John M. 2013. “Part 2—Reconstructing the Non-Eurocentric Foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric ‘Open Economy Politics’ to Inter-civilizational Political Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 20(5): 1055–81.
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1977. “An American Social Science: International Relations.” Daedalus 106(3): 4160.
Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Honneth, Axel. 2008. Reification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Howard, Michael. 2001. The Invention of Peace. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Inayatullah, Naeem, ed. 2011. Autobiographical International Relations: I, IR. Abingdon: Routledge.
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015a. “For a More Public Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 13(2): 269–83.
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015b. “Varieties of Empiricism in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 13(4): 929–34.
Ish-Shalom, Piki. 2013. Democratic Peace Theory: A Political History. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2002. Rethinking Weber: Towards a Non-individualist Sociology of World Politics. International Review of Sociology 12(3): 439–68.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2006. “A Statistician Strikes Out: In Defence of Genuine Methodological Diversity.” In Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method, ed. Schram, Sanford F. and Caterino, Brian. New York: NYU Press.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. New York: Routledge.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2015. “Must International Studies Be a Science?” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43(3): 942–65.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2009. “Paradigmatic Faults in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 53: 907–30.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2013. “International Theory in a Post-Paradigmatic Era: From Substantive Wagers to Scientific Ontologies.” European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 169–83.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2015. “Academia Isn’t Baseball.” Duck of Minerva, August 10. Available at http://duckofminerva.com/2015/08/academia-isnt-baseball.html#more-27509.
Jahn, Beate. 2017. “Theorizing the Political Relevance of International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly International Studies Quarterly 61(1): 6477.
Jentleson, Bruce W. 2002. “The Need for Praxis: Bringing Policy Relevance Back In.” International Security 26(4): 169–83.
Kant, Immanuel. 1987 [1790]. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Pluhar, Werner S.. Indiana: Hackett.
Katznelson, Ira. 2003. Desolation and Enlightenment. New York: Columbia University Press.
Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., eds. 2002. Political Science: The State of the Discipline. New York: Norton.
Katzenstein, Peter J. 2010. “‘Walls’ between ‘Those People’? Contrasting Perspectives on World Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 1125.
Keohane, Robert O. 2008. “Big Questions in the Study of World Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, ed. Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D..New York: Oxford University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 2009. “Political Science as a Vocation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42(2): 359–63.
King, Charles. 2015. “The Decline of Regional Studies.” Foreign Affairs, July/August. Available at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/decline-international-studies.
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kinnvall, Catarina. 2005. “Not Here, Not Now! The Absence of a European Perestroika Movement.” In Perestroika!, ed. Monroe, Kristen Renwick. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kinsella, Helen. 2011. The Image before the Weapon. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Krishna, Sankaran. 2001. “Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations.” Alternatives 26(4): 401–24.
Kristensen, Peter Marcus. 2012. “Dividing Discipline: Structures of Communication in International Relations.” International Studies Review 14: 3250.
Kristensen, Peter Marcus. 2016. “Discipline Admonished: On International Relations Fragmentation and the Disciplinary Politics of Stocktaking.” European Journal of International Relations 22: 243–67.
Kucklick, Bruce. 2006. Blind Oracles: Intellectuals and War from Kennan to Kissinger Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lake, David. 2011. “Why ‘Isms’ Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress.” International Studies Quarterly 55(1): 116.
Lake, David. 2016. “White Man’s IR: An Intellectual Confession.” Perspectives on Politics 14(4): 1112–22.
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2003. Tragic Vision of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Legro, Jeffrey and Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999. “Is Anyone Still a Realist?” International Security 24(2): 555.
Leira, Halvard. 2015. “International Relations Pluralism and History—Embracing Amateurism to Strengthen the Profession.” International Studies Perspectives 16: 2331.
Lepgold, Joseph. 1998. “Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance.” Political Science Quarterly 113(1): 4362.
Levine, Daniel J. 2012. Recovering International Relations: The Promise of Sustainable Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levine, Daniel J. and Barder, Alexander D.. 2014. “The Closing of the American Mind: ‘American School’ International Relations and the State of Grand Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 863–88.
Linklater, Andrew and Suganami, Hidemi. 2006. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lisle, Debbie: 2016. “Waiting for International Political Sociology: A Field Guide to Living In-Between.” International Political Sociology 10: 417–33.
Löwenheim, Oded. 2014. The Politics of the Trail. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lynch, Cecilia. 2013. Interpreting International Politics. New York: Routledge.
Maliniak, Daniel, Oakes, Amy, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2011. “International Relations in the US Academy.” International Studies Quarterly 55(2): 437–64.
Maliniak, Daniel, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2012. “Trip around the World: Teaching, Research, and Policy Views of International Relations Faculty in 20 Countries.” Available at https://www.wm.edu/offices/itpir/_documents/trip/trip_around_the_world_2011.pdf.
Mannheim, Karl. 1954. Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co.
Martin, Lisa L. 1999. “The Contributions of Rational Choice: A Defense of Pluralism.” International Security 24(2): 7483.
McCourt, David M. 2012. What’s at Stake in the Historical Turn? Theory, Practice, and Phronēsis in International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41(1): 2342.
McNamara, Kathleen R. 2009. “Of Intellectual Monocultures and the Study of IPE.” Review of International Political Economy 16(1): 7284.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2005. “E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On.” International Relations 19(2): 46–9.
Mearsheimer, John J. and Walt, Stephen M.. 2013. “Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 427–57.
Meckstroth, Christopher. 2012. “Socratic Method and Political Science.” American Political Science Review 106(3): 644–60.
Monroe, Kristen Renwick, ed. 2005. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1972. Science: Servant or Master? New York: Norton.
Naumes, Sarah. 2015. “Is All ‘I’, IR?” Millennium 43(3): 820–32.
NPR (National Public Radio). 2007. “NASA Administrator Michael Griffin Not Sure that Global Warming Is a Problem.” Morning Edition, May 31. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10571499l; accessed August 17.
Norton, Anne. 2004. 95 Theses on Politics, Culture, and Method. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Nye, Joseph S. 1986. Nuclear Ethics. New York: Free Press.
Nye, Joseph S. 1997. Understanding International Conflicts. New York: Longman.
Nye, Joseph S. 2008. “International Relations: The Relevance of Theory to Practice.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, ed. Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oren, Ido. 2003. Our Enemies and US: America’s Rivalries and the Making of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Oren, Ido. 2016. “A Sociological Analysis of the Decline of American IR Theory.” International Studies Review 18(4): 571–96.
Parmar, Inderjeet. 2012. Foundations of the American Century. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pitkin, Hannah Fenichel. 1987. “Rethinking Reification.” Theory and Society 16(2): 263–93.
Rengger, Nicholas. 2015. “Pluralism in International Relations Theory: Three Questions.” International Studies Review 16(1): 32–9.
Ricci, David M. 1984. The Tragedy of Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Robin, Ron. 2001. The Making of the Cold War Enemy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rohde, Joy. 2013. Armed with Expertise. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Rose, Gillian. 1978. The Melancholy Science. London: Verso.
Rosenberg, Justin. 1994. The Empire of Civil Society. London: Verso.
Rosenberg, Justin. 2016. “International Relations in the Prison of Political Science” International Relations 30(2): 127–53.
Russett, Bruce. 2005. “Bushwhacking the Democratic Peace.” International Studies Perspective, 6(4): 305408.
Sabaratnam, Meera. 2011. “IR in Dialogue … but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics.” Millennium 39(3): 781803.
Said, Edward. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage.
Schouten, Peer. 2008–2016. “Theory Talks.” http://www.theory-talks.org, accessed December 15, 2016.
Schram, Sanford F. and Caterino, Brian. 2006. Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method. New York: New York University Press.
Shapcott, Richard. 2001. Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shapiro, Ian. 2004. “Problems, Methods and Theories in the Study of Politics, or: What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to do about It?” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M. and Masoud, Tarek E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E., eds. 2004. Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shilliam, Robbie. 2017. Race and Revolution at Bwa Kayiman. Millennium. Online-before-print, DOI: 10.1177/0305829817693692.
Sil, Rudra. 2004. “Problems Chasing Methods, or Methods Chasing Problems? Research Communities, Constrained Pluralism, and the Role of Eclecticism.” In, Problems and in the Study of Politics, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sil, Rudra and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2008. “Eclectic Theorizing in the Study and Practice of International Relations.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, ed. Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sil, Rudra and Katzenstein, Peter J. 2010. “Analytical Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions.” Perspectives on Politics 8(2): 411–31.
Sil, Rudra and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2011. Beyond Paradigms: Analytical Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sjoberg, Laura. 2014. “Queering the “Territorial Peace”? Queer Theory Conversing With Mainstream International Relations.” International Studies Review 16(4): 608–12.
Sjoberg, Laura. 2015a. “Locating Relevance in Security Studies.” Perspectives on Politics 13(2): 396–8.
Sjoberg, Laura. 2015b. “Why I Don’t Give a Shit about my H-Index.” Relations International, August 17. Available at http://relationsinternational.com/why-i-dont-give-a-shit-about-my-h-index.
Sjoberg, Laura. 2017. “Caging Confessions: My Womanhood in David Lake’s White Man’s IR” Relations International, January 6. Available at http://relationsinternational.com/caging-confessions-womanhood-david-lakes-white-mans-ir/.
Sjoberg, Laura, Kadera, Kelley, and Thies, Cameron. 2016. “Reevaluating Gender and IR Scholarship.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, online-before-print. DOI: 10.1177/0022002716669207
Smith, Steve. 2004. “Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11.” International Studies Quarterly 48: 499515.
Snidal, Duncan and Reus-Smit, Christian eds. 2008. Oxford Handbook on International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Somit, Albert and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1967. The Development of Political Science from Burgess to Behavioralism. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2015. “All Hail to the Chief: Liberal IR Theory in the New World Order.” International Studies Perspectives 16: 4049.
Sylvester, Christine. 2007a. “Anatomy of a Footnote.” Security Dialogue 38(4): 547–58.
Sylvester, Christine. 2007b. “Whither the International at the End of IR.” Millennium 35(3): 551–73.
Tickner, Arlene B. and Waever, Ole, eds. International Relations Scholarship around the World. New York: Routledge.
Tjalve, Vibeke Schou and Michael C. Williams, M. C. 2015. “Reviving the Rhetoric of Realism: Politics and Responsibility in Grand Strategy.” Security Studies 24(1): 3760.
Tønder, Lars. 2014. “Comic Power: Another Road Not Taken?” Theory and Event 17(4).
Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1957. Community and Society. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Turton, Helen Louise. 2016. International Relations and American Dominance: A Diverse Discipline. New York: Routledge.
Van der Ree, Gerard. 2014. “Saving the Discipline: Plurality, Social Capital, and the Sociology of IR Theorizing.” International Political Sociology 8: 218–33.
Vitalis, Robert. 2015. White World Order, Black Power Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Vucetic, Srdjan. 2011. The Anglosphere. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Waever, Ole. 1998. “The Sociology of a Not-So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International Organization 52(4): 687727.
Waever, Ole. 2013. “Still a Discipline after All These Debates?” In International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, ed. Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walt, Stephen M. 1999. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies.” International Security 23(4): 548.
Walt, Stephen M. 2005. “The Relationship between Theory and Policy in International Relations.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 2348.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1986. “Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to my Critics.” In Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Keohane, Robert O.. New York: Columbia University Press.
Weber, Cynthia. 2015. “Why Is There No Queer International Theory?” European Journal of International Relations 21(1): 2751.
Weber, Max. 1949. “‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy.” In Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences, ed. Shils, Edward and Finch, Henry. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wight, Colin. 2006. Agents, Structures, and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Michael C. 2013.” In the Beginning: The International Relations Enlightenment and the Ends of IR Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 647–65.
Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, eds. 2006. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. London: Routledge.
Zerilli, Linda. 2016. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed