No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Diploid (2n = 28) to 22-ploid (2n = 308): Functional trait variation and the large-genome constraint in mulberry (Morus spp.)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 December 2025
Abstract
Mulberry (Morus spp.), a key moriculture crop, serves a dual role: its leaves are indispensable as exclusive fodder for silkworms, while its fruits, particularly in species such as Morus nigra, Morus laevigata and Morus macroura, are valued as functional foods enriched with antioxidants and vitamins. The genus exhibits remarkable natural chromosome-level variation ranging from 14 to 308, which offers a unique system to investigate the impact of genome expansion on plant function. Herein, the influence of different cytotypes on functional traits associated with cell division, cell size and biomass metrics was studied. Principal component analysis revealed that tetraploid (4x), followed by triploid (3x), exhibits the most favourable cytotype, suggesting a vigorous and balanced expression of polyploid advantage. However, downsizing of many key parameters with increasing ploidy levels was also evident, predominantly at 22-ploid (22x). Furthermore, the estimated plasticity index reveals that the lower limit of cell size and rate-limited attributes influenced the loss of growth superiority of the extreme ploidy level; in turn, data imply the large-genome constraint in mulberry, as the consequence of the functioning of a large genome is likely expensive. Therefore, the present study emphasizes that the benchmarking of ploidy levels for the selection of parental material is essential for improving cellular function and developmental efficiency, thereby optimizing leaf yield for the future sustainability of sericulture.
Information
- Type
- Short Communication
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany.
References
Bhadra, S, Šmarda, P, Bureš, P, and Horová, L (2023) From genome size to trait evolution during angiosperm radiation. Trends in Genetics 39(10), 728–735.10.1016/j.tig.2023.07.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, C, Chen, H, Zhang, Y, Thomas, HR, Frank, MH, He, Y and Xia, R (2020) TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Molecular Plant 13(8), 728–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Smet, R, Adams, KL, Vandepoele, K, Van Montagu, MC, Maere, S and Van de Peer, Y (2013) Convergent gene loss following gene and genome duplications creates single-copy families in flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(8), 2898–2903.10.1073/pnas.1300127110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, JJ and Coate, JE (2019) Polyploidy, the nucleotype, and novelty: the impact of genome doubling on the biology of the cell. International Journal of Plant Sciences 180(1), 1–52.10.1086/700636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnanesh, BN, Raju, M, Arunakumar, GS, Manojkumar, HB, Pradeep, S, Bhavya, MR, Sowbhagya, P, Burji, SM, Mogili, T and Sivaprasad, V (2023) Genome size, genetic diversity, and phenotypic variability imply the effect of genetic variation instead of ploidy on trait plasticity in the cross-pollinated tree species of mulberry. PLoS One 18(8), e0289766.10.1371/journal.pone.0289766CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, N, Zhang, C, Qi, X, Zhao, S, Tao, Y, Yang, G, Lee, T-H, Wang, X, Cai, Q, Li, D, Lu, M, Liao, S, Luo, G, He, R, Tan, X, Xu, Y, Li, T, Zhao, A, Jia, L, Fu, Q, Zeng, Q, Gao, C, Ma, B, Liang, J and Xiang, Z (2013) Draft genome sequence of the mulberry tree Morus notabilis. Nature. Communications 4, 2445.10.1038/ncomms3445CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kılınçer, İ, Khanyile, L, Gürcan, K, Şimşek, Ö, Uzun, A and Nikbakht-Dehkordi, A (2024) Decosaploid sour black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) in Western Asia: Features, domestication history, and unique population genetics. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 71(5), 2229–2246.10.1007/s10722-023-01771-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, CA, Molinari, NA and Petrov, DA (2005) The large genome constraint hypothesis: Evolution, ecology and phenotype. Annals of Botany 95, 177–190.10.1093/aob/mci011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruthika, HS, Rukmangada, MS and Naik, VG (2023) Genome size, chromosome number variation, and its correlation with stomatal characters for assessment of ploidy levels in a core subset of mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm. Gene 881, 147637.10.1016/j.gene.2023.147637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makino, A and Osmond, B (1991) Effects of nitrogen nutrition on nitrogen partitioning between chloroplasts and mitochondria in pea and wheat. Plant Physiology 96(2), 355–362.10.1104/pp.96.2.355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mondal, R, Dubey, H, Ramesha, A, Vijayan, K, Naik, VN and Moorthy, SM (2025) Phenome, repeatome, and transcriptome analysis to comprehend the structural and functional aspects of polyploid Morus serrata Roxb. Trees 39(5), 88.10.1007/s00468-025-02665-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondal, R, Antony, S, Gnanesh, BN, Thanavendan, G, Ravikumar, G, Sreenivasa, BT, Doss, GS and Vijayan, K (2023a) A protocol for mitotic metaphase chromosome count using shoot meristematic tissues of mulberry tree species. Bio-Protocol 13(17), e4643.10.21769/BioProtoc.4643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondal, R, Kumar, A and Gnanesh, BN (2023b) Crop germplasm: Current challenges, physiological-molecular perspective, and advance strategies towards development of climate-resilient crops. Heliyon 9(1), e12973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ræbild, A, Anamthawat-Jónsson, K, Egertsdotter, U, Immanen, J, Jensen, AM, Koutouleas, A, Martens, HJ, Nieminen, K, Olofsson, JK, Röper, AC and Salojärvi, J (2024) Polyploidy–A tool in adapting trees to future climate changes? A review of polyploidy in trees. Forest Ecology and Management 560, 121767.10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roddy, AB, Théroux-Rancourt, G, Abbo, T, Benedetti, JW, Brodersen, CR, Castro, M, Castro, S, Gilbride, AB, Jensen, B, Jiang, GF and Perkins, JA (2020) The scaling of genome size and cell size limits maximum rates of photosynthesis with implications for ecological strategies. International Journal of Plant Sciences 181(1), 75–87.10.1086/706186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šmarda, P, Klem, K, Knápek, O, Veselá, B, Veselá, K, Holub, P, Kuchař, V, Šilerová, A, Horová, L and Bureš, P (2023) Growth, physiology, and stomatal parameters of plant polyploids grown under ice age, present‐day, and future CO2 concentrations. New Phytologist 239(1), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šmarda, P, Veselý, P, Šmerda, J, Bureš, P, Knápek, O and Chytrá, M (2016) Polyploidy in a ‘living fossil’ Ginkgo biloba. New Phytologist 212(1), 11–4.10.1111/nph.14062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, D, Chen, M, Huang, X, Zhang, G, Zeng, L, Zhang, G, Wu, S and Wang, Y (2023) SRplot: A free online platform for data visualization and graphing. PloS One 18(11), e0294236.10.1371/journal.pone.0294236CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van’t Hof, J and Sparrow, AH (1963) A relationship between DNA content, nuclear volume, and minimum mitotic cycle time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 49(6), 897–902.Google ScholarPubMed
Ahmed et al. supplementary material 1
Ahmed et al. supplementary material
File
1 MB
Ahmed et al. supplementary material 2
Ahmed et al. supplementary material
File
19.6 KB
Ahmed et al. supplementary material 3
Ahmed et al. supplementary material
File
1 MB